What does the Bible teach about physical abuse?

Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟95,047.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I don't think it's so much about what God should or shouldn't be like, but more about the fact that a large percentage of people have those types of experiences (Jung called them synchronicities). A Buddhist or Hindu might explain those in terms of karmic affinity, mystic law, or somesuch, but a Christian happens to explain them in terms of interaction with an anthropomorphic being.
Yes, I agree. But coincidence do happen, don't they?
Also, it does seem out of character for God. He's perfectly capable of communicating with humans. He's shown so many times. But instead...well, I like the way this essay puts it:
One More Burning Bush - Daylight Atheism
"this simple and reasonable strategy has not been carried out. Instead, the theists say, God has adopted a strategy for getting human beings’ attention that can only reasonably be described as bizarre – always remaining hidden, never clearly showing himself despite it being well within his power, but dropping coy hints from time to time. Imagine if you loved a person with all your heart, and wanted them to love you in return; but instead of approaching them, introducing yourself and explaining your feelings, you chose to remain hidden, never letting them see or hear you, but occasionally trying to get their attention through indirect means: leaving money where they might find it, or creeping into their bedroom while they were asleep and tucking the blankets around them, or sending a steady stream of representatives to knock on the person’s door and tell them that you loved them and wanted to spend your life with them – but ordering those representatives to turn down any of the person’s requests to actually see you as indicative of a hurtful lack of faith on their part. Is this how a rational person behaves? In such a situation, in fact, would you blame the other person for beginning to doubt whether you really existed at all? And yet, if we accept the claims of many theists, this method is how God chooses to relate to humanity. What could possibly be the point of this behavior?"
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
30,637
18,535
Orlando, Florida
✟1,260,418.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Politics
US-Democrat
Yes, I agree. But coincidence do happen, don't they?
Also, it does seem out of character for God. He's perfectly capable of communicating with humans. He's shown so many times. But instead...well, I like the way this essay puts it:
One More Burning Bush - Daylight Atheism
"this simple and reasonable strategy has not been carried out. Instead, the theists say, God has adopted a strategy for getting human beings’ attention that can only reasonably be described as bizarre – always remaining hidden, never clearly showing himself despite it being well within his power, but dropping coy hints from time to time. Imagine if you loved a person with all your heart, and wanted them to love you in return; but instead of approaching them, introducing yourself and explaining your feelings, you chose to remain hidden, never letting them see or hear you, but occasionally trying to get their attention through indirect means: leaving money where they might find it, or creeping into their bedroom while they were asleep and tucking the blankets around them, or sending a steady stream of representatives to knock on the person’s door and tell them that you loved them and wanted to spend your life with them – but ordering those representatives to turn down any of the person’s requests to actually see you as indicative of a hurtful lack of faith on their part. Is this how a rational person behaves? In such a situation, in fact, would you blame the other person for beginning to doubt whether you really existed at all? And yet, if we accept the claims of many theists, this method is how God chooses to relate to humanity. What could possibly be the point of this behavior?"

You do realize some people display affection or care through use of indirect means?

I just don't see this as a particularly good argument against Christianity. Likewise, I just don't see "God told me so" as particularly persuasive, either.
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,230
5,625
Erewhon
Visit site
✟932,027.00
Faith
Atheist
You do realize some people display affection or care through use of indirect means?

I just don't see this as a particularly good argument against Christianity. Likewise, I just don't see "God told me so" as particularly persuasive, either.
If you don't mind me interjecting: While actual people might display affection by indirect means, they don't show their existence by indirect means. A god who wants a relationship should act like it; at a bare minimum, act like it exists.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
30,637
18,535
Orlando, Florida
✟1,260,418.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Politics
US-Democrat
If you don't mind me interjecting: While actual people might display affection by indirect means, they don't show their existence by indirect means. A god who wants a relationship should act like it; at a bare minimum, act like it exists.

Well, here's the thing... philosophers have been contemplating existence for some time, what it means to exist, and I don't think you are going to find the kind of definitive conclusions that you assume are just obvious.
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,230
5,625
Erewhon
Visit site
✟932,027.00
Faith
Atheist
Well, here's the thing... philosophers have been contemplating existence for some time, what it means to exist, and I don't think you are going to find the kind of definitive conclusions that you assume are just obvious.
I'm not sure what you are getting at. Care to elaborate?

In the meantime: Christian theology is that God wants a personal relationship with us. Anything I have a personal relationship with I can point to and demonstrate the existence of. I might choose not to if, say, it proved too expensive; but, I could. Certainly, I would do X if my doing X had life-or-death implications. Yet, this god of theirs wants a personal relationship, but can't be bothered to give me a Damascus road experience; it can't be bothered to show me the holes in his hands; it can't be bothered to send down fire from heaven; it can't be bothered to grow limbs; yanno that thing where Christians will do greater things than these? Yeah, nope. Etc. This is the Canadian boyfriend problem amplified.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
30,637
18,535
Orlando, Florida
✟1,260,418.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Politics
US-Democrat
I'm not sure what you are getting at. Care to elaborate?

Simply that what it means to exist is something that philosophers haven't nailed down.

In the meantime: Christian theology is that God wants a personal relationship with us.

That's more Evangelicalism than Christianity per se.
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,230
5,625
Erewhon
Visit site
✟932,027.00
Faith
Atheist
Simply that what it means to exist is something that philosophers haven't nailed down.
Sure. I've contemplated that myself a bit, however unqualified I might be. However, I doubt whatever "nailing down" they do will change my point. Things that can be said to exist have evidence of that existence. We don't know what dark matter/energy is, but there is an effect that nothing else accounts for -- that is, dark matter exists even if we don't know what it is; even if "dark matter" is a placeholder, there is something there. Gods? Not so much.

That's more Evangelicalism than Christianity per se.
Fair enough. I should be more precise, though, I think a lot of these discussions are with E-Types (Jaguar?) -- but, yeah, that's an excuse.

Nevertheless, a being that wants my devotion, my fealty, my tithe :/, should provide better than 3rd party claims of his/its requirements and expectations.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
30,637
18,535
Orlando, Florida
✟1,260,418.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Politics
US-Democrat
Sure. I've contemplated that myself a bit, however unqualified I might be. However, I doubt whatever "nailing down" they do will change my point. Things that can be said to exist have evidence of that existence. We don't know what dark matter/energy is, but there is an effect that nothing else accounts for -- that is, dark matter exists even if we don't know what it is; even if "dark matter" is a placeholder, there is something there. Gods? Not so much.

Fair enough. I should be more precise, though, I think a lot of these discussions are with E-Types (Jaguar?) -- but, yeah, that's an excuse.

Nevertheless, a being that wants my devotion, my fealty, my tithe :/, should provide better than 3rd party claims of his/its requirements and expectations.

I just don't think of religious questions in those terms, being influenced more by Carl Jung and Mahayana Buddhism and "transcending" a traditional Christian perspective. God's existence is less interesting to me than how religious communities and traditions impact peoples lives. My basic assumption is that ultimate reality is unknowable and I treat dogmatic claims with a great deal of skepticism now days.
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,230
5,625
Erewhon
Visit site
✟932,027.00
Faith
Atheist
My basic assumption is that ultimate reality is unknowable
My basic assumption is that ultimate reality is a fantasy. (Sorry, I don't mean to be offensive. I thought of other words such as delusion, illusion, wrong. But all of them could be seen as offensive.)

and I treat dogmatic claims with a great deal of skepticism now days.
As do I.
 
Upvote 0

Sanoy

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2017
3,169
1,421
America
✟118,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm sorry if you're having trouble following, Sanoy.


Certainly.
I never said that it was a global miracle. It appears that you misread or misunderstood me. I said that it was a miracle whose meaning could be understood by any Christian all over the world (as indeed it is - all Christians worldwide know the story of Elijah, at least if they know their Bibles). It is you who needs substantiate your curious claim that the miracle should be ignored by anyone except the people who were its audience at the time. Please feel free to do so by saying:
"The miracle that Elijah performed was only relevant to the immediate audience because __________".


No, I didn't make that claim. This is not the first time you've said that I did, so please read this carefully - it only undermines your credibility when you strawman.
I did not say that Christians only pray for things they know are going to happen anyway. That would be not make sense at all. I said - as is clearly the case - that Christians only pray for things which could happen naturally.
Since I've made this point a number of times now, I'm baffled as to how you can keep missing it.
Oh, and by the way: if you keep saying that the Prayer Wall of "Christian Forums" does not represent Christian thought, perhaps you'd like to pop over there and tell them to stop praying?


Sounds reasonable to me. All you have to do to disprove me is find some examples of Christians praying for genuine miracles.


I stand by that statement. Of course, I haven't heard or read every prayer a Christian has ever made. Perhaps you can find some examples to show me I'm wrong?


Sanoy, do you realise that the first, second and third quotes you just made are all me saying the same thing in different ways? It's not three points, it's one. And in each case, my answer is clearly the same.
Not that I mind these errors of yours. I'm in a patient mood, and it's to my advantage if my sparring partner in a debate makes mistakes.


Did I say it was not a local miracle? It certainly was, as it was seen by only the people in the immediate area. But it has been read about by billions of people all over the world, and is now a part of the Jewish and Christian religions.
That clearly being the case, I find your insistence that modern-day Christians should pay no attention to it to be puzzling in the extreme. Are you able to explain yourself?


Perhaps we should have a vote on that, with atheists only allowed to vote? You could ask them about this.
In point of fact, pointing out the flaws in Christian logic is a very atheistic thing to do, and the reason most of us nonbelievers are on these forums.


If you don't understand the arguments I've made, then I'm sorry. I'll continue to make them in the clearest, simplest terms I have. But your insistence that I'm not making arguments when I clearly am is only making you look like you don't know what you're talking about.


Sure. I've done so. Again, and again, and again. I'm just interested to see if and when you will respond to them. So far, all you seem to want to do is ignore them. You carry on that way if you like, of course. While I prefer an opponent who can understand what I'm saying and respond to my arguments, it's not necessarily a disadvantage to have someone who acts irrationally.

Now, in the clearest possible language I can manage, so that there is no chance of a miscommunication:

All example of Christian prayer that I have seen are of Christians asking for things which could happen naturally. I have not seen examples of Christians asking for miracles. As evidence of this, I offer the Prayer Wall of this forum.

Please either show me examples of how Christians there are asking for miracles from God, or else explain exactly why their prayers are not representative of Christians.


Please explain why you think God would, should or could not perform a miracle on the same scale as the one He performed for Elijah.

The ball's in your court, Sanoy. I'll be interested to see how you answer, if you can.
I never said the miracle Elijah prayed for should be ignored by every modern day Christian. I said that it was for Israel. You claimed that was a rationalization, and never backed that up. This was a unique case because, as I said before, Israel was God's portion. The other nations were allotted to other Elohim in punishment (Deut 32:8 LLX). I'm not saying it won't be done again, but it is a unique condition cosmic geographical warfare.

I was paraphrasing your statement here - "You can go to the Prayer Wall and see the kinds of things Christians post. It seems reasonable to assume that this is fairly typical Christian prayer. All for things which could happen anyway." So I'll take what you really meant - "that Christians only pray for things which could happen naturally." What is your evidence for that claim? And don't tell me the prayer wall. Not only must you establish that this is all every Christian ever prays for, you must also show those things can happen naturally. I'm glad you corrected my misunderstanding, but it doesn't change your burden.

I asked you to evidence your claims but you did not do so. What sounds reasonable to you isn't a reason why your claim is true. It's no surprise that you believe your claims are true.

You want to have a forum vote to see if you speak for all atheists here? Do you not see how ridiculous such a request is? The ones I speak to give evidence for their claims. If I'm wrong I'm wrong but you appear to be more of an exception in not handling your burden.

Your prayer claim is broken on multiple layers. You are in no position to remark on what Christians pray for, or how they pray. Nor are you in a position to claim what things can happen naturally on the personal level, or in some cases even the global level. There is not a single position in such a claim in which you are qualified to remark on, or are capable of backing up. So when you are ready to meet the spirit of the SOP for this forums let me know.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

A_Thinker

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 23, 2004
11,911
9,064
Midwest
✟953,784.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm not sure what you are getting at. Care to elaborate?

In the meantime: Christian theology is that God wants a personal relationship with us. Anything I have a personal relationship with I can point to and demonstrate the existence of. I might choose not to if, say, it proved too expensive; but, I could. Certainly, I would do X if my doing X had life-or-death implications. Yet, this god of theirs wants a personal relationship, but can't be bothered to give me a Damascus road experience; it can't be bothered to show me the holes in his hands; it can't be bothered to send down fire from heaven; it can't be bothered to grow limbs; yanno that thing where Christians will do greater things than these? Yeah, nope. Etc. This is the Canadian boyfriend problem amplified.
Yet 2 billion persons claim to have this relationship with Him.

What are they seeing that you aren't ?
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
30,637
18,535
Orlando, Florida
✟1,260,418.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Politics
US-Democrat
Yet 2 billion persons claim to have this relationship with Him.

What are they seeing that you aren't ?

Hold on... that's not how Christianity works in general . For about a billion of those people, at least, their relationship to God is mediated through a hierarchy of authority and its sacramental system. Even in some Protestant churches, this is more or less how it works.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Tinker Grey
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
30,637
18,535
Orlando, Florida
✟1,260,418.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Politics
US-Democrat

Tanya Luhrman's When God Talks Balk discusses this kind of Evangelical Charismatic religion. Luhrman is an anthropologist that studies religion. It has a scientific explanation other than necessarily requiring the objective existence of YHWH. The main thing people are experiencing is what psychologists call absorbtion. In this sense it isn't completely unlike what meditators experience. In fact, Luhrman cites a study that was done comparing instruction on having a relationship with "God" vs. those that meditate, and the results were similar, though the "personal relationship" was easier to practice for most people.

I view meditation as giving me alot of benefits of religion without the dangerous nonsense. Sam Harris has a similar attitude as well.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟95,047.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
If you don't mind me interjecting: While actual people might display affection by indirect means, they don't show their existence by indirect means. A god who wants a relationship should act like it; at a bare minimum, act like it exists.

Thank you, Tinker. I think you've answered the questions perfectly here.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟95,047.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I never said the miracle Elijah prayed for should be ignored by every modern day Christian. I said that it was for Israel. You claimed that was a rationalization, and never backed that up. This was a unique case because, as I said before, Israel was God's portion. The other nations were allotted to other Elohim in punishment (Deut 32:8 LLX). I'm not saying it won't be done again, but it is a unique condition cosmic geographical warfare.
Good. So basically, you concede my position. There's no reason why such a thing shouldn't happen again, and plenty of reasons why it should; and therefore the fact that it has not happened is very puzzling if you believe that God actually exists as Christians describe Him. But if you think that God is a fictional character, then it makes perfect sense that He only actually interacts with people in stories.

I was paraphrasing your statement here - "You can go to the Prayer Wall and see the kinds of things Christians post. It seems reasonable to assume that this is fairly typical Christian prayer. All for things which could happen anyway." So I'll take what you really meant - "that Christians only pray for things which could happen naturally." What is your evidence for that claim? And don't tell me the prayer wall. Not only must you establish that this is all every Christian ever prays for, you must also show those things can happen naturally. I'm glad you corrected my misunderstanding, but it doesn't change your burden.
My evidence for the claim is that we can all see how Christians act. It's not like they do so in secret. I chose the Prayer Wall because it's a public display of prayers, there for all to see. Apparently you can't take me up on the challenge, and I don't blame you. Because what we can see there, as well as everywhere else, is that Christians frequently ask God to do things - but never things that could only happen if God existed.
All you have to do to prove me wrong is show examples of Christians asking God for actual bona fide miracles. But you can't. Okay. Fine by me. Thanks for your time.

You want to have a forum vote to see if you speak for all atheists here? Do you not see how ridiculous such a request is? The ones I speak to give evidence for their claims. If I'm wrong I'm wrong but you appear to be more of an exception in not handling your burden.
You are wrong. ;)
And from the discussions I can see, there are plenty of non-Christians on this forum that I agree with and who agree with me. It would be impolite to drag them in to our little discussion, so I won't, but as far as I can tell, calling out Christian mistakes and explaining why they are mistakes is the reason we're all here; and having Christians stare the facts in the face and deny them is par for the course.
Take a look at this:
25 Reasons We Don’t Live in a World with a God (Part 7)
An article by an atheist, a well-known member of the Patheos website.
"Because not even Christians take their religion seriously"
If you skim through the article, you'll see this atheist blogger is in complete agreement with me, as is the American Humanist article it quotes. I can also inform you that Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchen agree with me. I fact, I'd be surprised to find any person who identifies as an atheist who did not agree with a statement like:
"If God proved His existence in the Old and New Testaments, and if Christians claim that God works miracles all the time, it seems strange that we never have evidence of these miracles."

So, Sanoy, if you want to say that I am a discredit to atheists everywhere, I suspect that most atheists will not be impressed by your claims.

Your prayer claim is broken on multiple layers. You are in no position to remark on what Christians pray for, or how they pray. Nor are you in a position to claim what things can happen naturally on the personal level, or in some cases even the global level. There is not a single position in such a claim in which you are qualified to remark on, or are capable of backing up. So when you are ready to meet the spirit of the SOP for this forums let me know.
Of course I am. I can remark on all of these things, because they're obvious. We can all see what Christians do and say. We can all see that Christians habitually fail to treat god like He's actually going to work a miracle. Your job, Sanoy, is now to prove what you say. You've spent quite a but of time dodging the challenge, and I don't blame you.

Here, have a look at this:
Christianity makes bold claims: that prayers are answered. That God protects his own. That Jesus heals disease. It’s one thing to blithely support these claims, as some Christians feel obliged to do, but it gets messy when those claims crash into real-world facts.
Take, for example, the claim that Jesus miraculously heals disease. A New Zealand church put up a billboard in 2012 that said, “Jesus Heals Cancer,” but if you’re advertising an important claim, belief is not enough. You need the evidence to back it up, and the government authority in charge of advertising unsurprisingly concluded that the evidence wasn’t there. One observer objected, “As the mother of a three-year-old boy who has spent the past 18 months fighting against leukemia, I find the above billboard offensive and upsetting.”
Most Christians expect a cultivated person to have the decorum to avoid actually testing Christianity’s claims (even if they’re begging to be tested). The problem arises when someone doesn’t have the good taste to resist that temptation.
In another example, a Pennsylvania couple let their two-year-old child die of bacterial pneumonia in 2009 when they chose prayer instead of medicine. Knowing first hand that prayer doesn’t heal, they did it again with another child in 2013.
Contrasting a similar series of preventable childhood deaths in Oregon with the national motto “In God We Trust,” an American Humanist article made an incisive observation. In response to Oregon’s removing laws protecting parents who reject medical care for their children in favor of prayer, it said,
[These changes to the law are] tantamount to the state saying, “Sure, it looks great on a coin, but come on you idiot, it’s not as though this god stuff actually works.”


It's perfectly correct. Christianity does make bold claims. But not only is there no proof that prayers are ever answered, there's plenty of evidence that Christians don't even ask for miracles. They are being very sensible. On the rare occasions (such as those outlined above) that they do act as if God exists (Jesus will heal my child, I don't need medicine) God does not help, sometimes with tragic consequences.

It really is interesting, that Prayer Wall, as it completely explodes what you're saying. I find it fascinating. Do they not realise that God is all-powerful, works miracles, and has promised to help them? Well, they say they realise it, and I'm sure that they believe it. But, quite simply, they also know that God doesn't actually answer impossible prayers.

And the simplest explanation for that is, He can't. Story characters can do amazing, incredible things - but only in stories.
 
Upvote 0

Sanoy

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2017
3,169
1,421
America
✟118,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Good. So basically, you concede my position. There's no reason why such a thing shouldn't happen again, and plenty of reasons why it should; and therefore the fact that it has not happened is very puzzling if you believe that God actually exists as Christians describe Him. But if you think that God is a fictional character, then it makes perfect sense that He only actually interacts with people in stories.


My evidence for the claim is that we can all see how Christians act. It's not like they do so in secret. I chose the Prayer Wall because it's a public display of prayers, there for all to see. Apparently you can't take me up on the challenge, and I don't blame you. Because what we can see there, as well as everywhere else, is that Christians frequently ask God to do things - but never things that could only happen if God existed.
All you have to do to prove me wrong is show examples of Christians asking God for actual bona fide miracles. But you can't. Okay. Fine by me. Thanks for your time.


You are wrong. ;)
And from the discussions I can see, there are plenty of non-Christians on this forum that I agree with and who agree with me. It would be impolite to drag them in to our little discussion, so I won't, but as far as I can tell, calling out Christian mistakes and explaining why they are mistakes is the reason we're all here; and having Christians stare the facts in the face and deny them is par for the course.
Take a look at this:
25 Reasons We Don’t Live in a World with a God (Part 7)
An article by an atheist, a well-known member of the Patheos website.
"Because not even Christians take their religion seriously"
If you skim through the article, you'll see this atheist blogger is in complete agreement with me, as is the American Humanist article it quotes. I can also inform you that Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchen agree with me. I fact, I'd be surprised to find any person who identifies as an atheist who did not agree with a statement like:
"If God proved His existence in the Old and New Testaments, and if Christians claim that God works miracles all the time, it seems strange that we never have evidence of these miracles."

So, Sanoy, if you want to say that I am a discredit to atheists everywhere, I suspect that most atheists will not be impressed by your claims.


Of course I am. I can remark on all of these things, because they're obvious. We can all see what Christians do and say. We can all see that Christians habitually fail to treat god like He's actually going to work a miracle. Your job, Sanoy, is now to prove what you say. You've spent quite a but of time dodging the challenge, and I don't blame you.

Here, have a look at this:
Christianity makes bold claims: that prayers are answered. That God protects his own. That Jesus heals disease. It’s one thing to blithely support these claims, as some Christians feel obliged to do, but it gets messy when those claims crash into real-world facts.
Take, for example, the claim that Jesus miraculously heals disease. A New Zealand church put up a billboard in 2012 that said, “Jesus Heals Cancer,” but if you’re advertising an important claim, belief is not enough. You need the evidence to back it up, and the government authority in charge of advertising unsurprisingly concluded that the evidence wasn’t there. One observer objected, “As the mother of a three-year-old boy who has spent the past 18 months fighting against leukemia, I find the above billboard offensive and upsetting.”
Most Christians expect a cultivated person to have the decorum to avoid actually testing Christianity’s claims (even if they’re begging to be tested). The problem arises when someone doesn’t have the good taste to resist that temptation.
In another example, a Pennsylvania couple let their two-year-old child die of bacterial pneumonia in 2009 when they chose prayer instead of medicine. Knowing first hand that prayer doesn’t heal, they did it again with another child in 2013.
Contrasting a similar series of preventable childhood deaths in Oregon with the national motto “In God We Trust,” an American Humanist article made an incisive observation. In response to Oregon’s removing laws protecting parents who reject medical care for their children in favor of prayer, it said,
[These changes to the law are] tantamount to the state saying, “Sure, it looks great on a coin, but come on you idiot, it’s not as though this god stuff actually works.”


It's perfectly correct. Christianity does make bold claims. But not only is there no proof that prayers are ever answered, there's plenty of evidence that Christians don't even ask for miracles. They are being very sensible. On the rare occasions (such as those outlined above) that they do act as if God exists (Jesus will heal my child, I don't need medicine) God does not help, sometimes with tragic consequences.

It really is interesting, that Prayer Wall, as it completely explodes what you're saying. I find it fascinating. Do they not realise that God is all-powerful, works miracles, and has promised to help them? Well, they say they realise it, and I'm sure that they believe it. But, quite simply, they also know that God doesn't actually answer impossible prayers.

And the simplest explanation for that is, He can't. Story characters can do amazing, incredible things - but only in stories.
I haven't conceded you position, I stated a long time ago that it could happen again. I never said there is no reason it wouldn't, in fact I stated the exact opposite and gave 2 reasons why among several that I could have chosen. As in the last thread you have not shown why those reasons are overcome.

The majority of Christian prayer is done in secret and certainly not done on the prayer wall. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, have no viable data for it, and I have made it perfectly clear that the prayer wall is not representative. Neither would a vote by atheists on the apologetics section represent atheists. It is ridiculous to think so. You need to accept that this will never be considered representative instead of repeating yourself over and over again. Even if you could make it representative you have no way to verify what can happen naturally in personal cases.

I don't think you are representative of atheists, because of your behavior, and your unwillingness to back up your claims, and I'm not the only one that thinks so if you will recall. If you think you can change my mind by words you are mistaken.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟95,047.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I haven't conceded you position, I stated a long time ago that it could happen again. I never said there is no reason it wouldn't, in fact I stated the exact opposite and gave 2 reasons why among several that I could have chosen. As in the last thread you have not shown why those reasons are overcome.

The majority of Christian prayer is done in secret and certainly not done on the prayer wall. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, have no viable data for it, and I have made it perfectly clear that the prayer wall is not representative. Neither would a vote by atheists on the apologetics section represent atheists. It is ridiculous to think so. You need to accept that this will never be considered representative instead of repeating yourself over and over again. Even if you could make it representative you have no way to verify what can happen naturally in personal cases.

I don't think you are representative of atheists, because of your behavior, and your unwillingness to back up your claims, and I'm not the only one that thinks so if you will recall. If you think you can change my mind by words you are mistaken.
Okay. I can see you're finding this aggravating, so we'd better stop here for the moment. I've no desire to get into another fight so soon, and your comments are starting to get personal, which is a good warning sign.
Anyway, we're starting to go round in circles here, with you just repeating points that have already been addressed.
See you another time!
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,944
11,098
okie
✟214,996.00
Faith
Anabaptist
p.s. God does not exist as Christians describe Him - He is not limited that way. That is a very common mis-conception.

His Existence is entirely His Own, and is and remains a mystery to practically everyone including Christians.

As to the TITLE, the Bible teaches almost nothing, maybe nothing, about "physical abuse"(as a societal/ political term used today that it is) .
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums