- Sep 26, 2016
- 8,602
- 2,107
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
If you ignore all of the passages, like Matthew 25:31-46, and John 5:27-30, and 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10, and 2 Timothy 4:1, and Revelation 11:18, which prove the Premill doctrine is wrong, then maybe you can make the above work.
You have certainly made a good effort to accomplish that goal.
.
Let me try and simplify things. Let me try asking it like this then. Which verses in Revelation 12:2-17 are taking place while satan is bound a thousand years? And which verses in Revelation 12:2-17 are taking place while satan is having his little season following the thousand years? That's not an unreasonable request is it?
Obviously some of the verses in Revelation 12:2-17 have to be taking place during the thousand years, and some during satan's little season, if satan's thousand year binding and loosing occur in this age prior to the 2nd coming. If Revelation 12:2-17 covers none of that, even though those verses obviously cover at least 2000 years, why are Amils even claiming satan is bound a thousand years in this age, followed by him being loosed a little season, if they can't show which verses in Revelation 12:2-17 occur during the thousand years, and which ones occur during satan's little season?
And another request just came to mind. There are 19 chapters before we get to Revelation 20. Can Amils produce any passages where the events that are taking place, that they are taking place during the thousand years while satan is bound?
Last edited:
Upvote
0