What did the Early Church Fathers write about the return of Christ during 70 AD?

Status
Not open for further replies.

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
You are missing the context by ignoring verses 5-7.
Just because I didn't quote a whole wall of text of the Bible passage doesn't mean I'm "ignoring" verses.
They would not be able to carry the Gospel to every city in Israel before He would be sacrificed as the Messiah.


Mat_18:11 For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.
I have to say that I have never come across the argument that "the Son of Man comes" is the same thing as the Messiah is crucified. Where else in Scripture informs us of this revelation? Since you seem to value the early church father's and their writing - do you have an early church father commentary that teaches this?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
.....and when was it that the followers of Christ fled Jerusalem and brought the Gospel to the Gentiles? It wasn't at His crucifixion (He'd even told them to wait IN JERUSALEM to wait for the baptism of the Holy Spirit after His crucifixion).

Acts 1:1-4 ~ After His suffering, He presented Himself to them with many convincing proofs that He was alive. He appeared to them over a span of forty days and spoke about the kingdom of God. And while they were gathered together, He commanded them: “Do not leave Jerusalem, but wait for the gift the Father promised, which you have heard Me discuss.



It was when Stephen was martyred that they fled Jerusalem. They needed to abide by the instructions to bring the Gospel to the Jews first (as you're emphasizing). This was all fulfillment of the prophecy of Daniel - the confirmation of His covenant with Daniel's people - the Israelites - and the 70 weeks determined and set aside for them:

Acts 8:1
Saul Persecutes the Church

On that day a great persecution broke out against the church in Jerusalem, and all except the apostles were scattered throughout Judea and Samaria.


8897-70-Week-Prophecy.jpg
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Do you deny that Matthew 10:23 is directly tied to the instructions given in Matthew 10:5-7?

.
Absolutely not - it all goes together. Why would you ask that?
 
Upvote 0

Erik Nelson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2017
5,118
1,649
46
Utah
✟347,648.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
According to (my understanding of) Don K. Preston's most recent YouTube video:

Revelation 18:4 = "out of doom" = Hosea 13:13
= Hosea 13:14 = 1 Corinthians 15:54 = resurrection

1 Corinthians 15:51 = "we" = 1st century generation = Matthew 24:34

Accordingly, Mr. Preston "telescopes" everything from tribulation to Judgement of Jerusalem to FJ & Resurrection into a single 70 AD event
 
Upvote 0

Erik Nelson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2017
5,118
1,649
46
Utah
✟347,648.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Where was Christ between the time below and 70 AD?

Act 1:9 And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.
Act 1:10 And while they looked stedfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel;
Act 1:11 Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.

.
In heaven, same place Jesus has been ever since ?
  • Ascension [to heaven] = 33 AD
  • Seated at God's Right Hand [in heaven] = 70 AD
  • 2C [back from heaven] @ FJ = Biblically soon
 
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Because Matthew 10:5-7 answers your question about Matthew 10:23.

.
No it doesn't, because my question had to do with *your* understanding.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Erik Nelson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2017
5,118
1,649
46
Utah
✟347,648.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Are you advocating an invisible coming of Christ
Luk 21:27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.
Luk 21:28 And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.


Act 28:28 Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it.



Rom 11:25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.

Did the blindness of Israel end during 70 AD?
Did the last Gentile come into the Church during 70 AD?



.
Stephen witness Jesus at God's Right Hand in about 34 AD

Others only "got the message in a language right down to earth that everyone here can easily understand" in 70 AD [=40th anniversary?], when Titus arrived at Passover, and started surrounding the city with Crucifixes, ultimately torching the temple ?
 
Upvote 0

Erik Nelson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2017
5,118
1,649
46
Utah
✟347,648.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Are we making too much of this issue?

"coming on the clouds" = Daniel 7:13-14

At his trial, Jesus was prophesying to the (spiritually) corrupt (ex-)Religious leaders that they would witness Jesus affirmed at Christ by Heaven through the worship of all nations of gentiles

By the Council of Nicaea in 326 AD, gentiles from Britain to India confessed Jesus as God's Chosen Messiah

QED?

case closed?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
.....and when was it that the followers of Christ fled Jerusalem and brought the Gospel to the Gentiles? It wasn't at His crucifixion (He'd even told them to wait IN JERUSALEM to wait for the baptism of the Holy Spirit after His crucifixion).

Based on your chart, and Matthew 10:5-7, and Romans 1:16, and Galatians 1:14-18, it was about 34 AD, instead of 70 AD.

The Gospel was taken "first" to the Jews for about 7 years, before Paul began his ministry to the Gentiles, which is in perfect agreement with your chart.


.
 
Upvote 0

Erik Nelson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2017
5,118
1,649
46
Utah
✟347,648.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
In rebuttle to Don K. Preston's video 143 about Isaiah 24-27 ("the little apocalypse"):

Isaiah 27 distinguishes "Jacob" from "Israel"
  • "Jacob" will be invaded (v6)
  • "Jacob" will be struck as they struck, slain as they slew (v7)
  • Temple & Jerusalem will be demolished (vv10-11)
accurately describes
  • the tragic Jewish-Roman war, when the Roman legions invaded Judea (v6)
  • the siege of Jerusalem during which thousands of inhabitants were crucified (v7)
  • and Titus torched the temple & bulldozed all buildings (vv10-11) in 70 AD

all that allows
  • "Israel" to "blossom and fill the world" (v6)
accurately describing
  • how the Church, as true spiritual Israel, flowered after the war, and came to fill the then-known world, from Britain to India & China, by the Council of Nicaea in 326 AD

It is possible to interpret the "resurrection" Mr. Preston highlights as a "spiritual resurrection of [true spiritual] Israel" = "gentiles grafted in to the rootstock of Abraham and trunk of the Jewish Apostles" = Church

Church = "body of Christ" on earth

Church triumphant after all "spiritual stones in spiritual temple" had been scattered by the Crucifixion = Spiritual Resurrection of True Spiritual Israel (John 2:21)

It is possible to distinguish that Spiritual Resurrection of True Spiritual Israel as the Church... from the physical bodily resurrection at Final Judgement after the Second Coming
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Isaiah 27 distinguishes "Jacob" from "Israel"
  • "Jacob" will be invaded (v6)
  • "Jacob" will be struck as they struck, slain as they slew (v7)
  • Temple & Jerusalem will be demolished (vv10-11)
accurately describes
  • the tragic Jewish-Roman war, when the Roman legions invaded Judea (v6)
  • the siege of Jerusalem during which thousands of inhabitants were crucified (v7)
  • and Titus torched the temple & bulldozed all buildings (vv10-11) in 70 AD

all that allows
  • "Israel" to "blossom and fill the world" (v6)
accurately describing
  • how the Church, as true spiritual Israel, flowered after the war, and came to fill the then-known world, from Britain to India & China, by the Council of Nicaea in 326 AD

It is possible to interpret the "resurrection" Mr. Preston highlights as a "spiritual resurrection of [true spiritual] Israel" = "gentiles grafted in to the rootstock of Abraham and trunk of the Jewish Apostles" = Church

Church = "body of Christ" on earth

Church triumphant after all "spiritual stones in spiritual temple" had been scattered by the Crucifixion = Spiritual Resurrection of True Spiritual Israel (John 2:21)

It is possible to distinguish that Spiritual Resurrection of True Spiritual Israel as the Church... from the physical bodily resurrection at Final Judgement after the Second Coming

Erik,

Instead of reporting this post to the administrators of this forum, I would like to ask you personally to remove the video of Full-Preterist Don K. Preston from this thread.

I am making the assumption you did not realize Preston is a leading proponent of Full-Preterism.

........................................


Preston's argument falls apart in Galatians 4:24-31, where Paul says the Sinai Covenant is the covenant of "bondage", and compels the Galatian believers to "cast out" the Sinai Covenant of "bondage".

The author of the Book of Hebrews says we are not come to the mountain that burns with fire (Sinai), in Hebrews 12:18-24.

But instead, we are come to the New Covenant of Christ.

..............................................

Preston is found in the passage below.

2Ti 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

2Ti 2:16 But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.
2Ti 2:17 And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus;
2Ti 2:18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.

.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Erik Nelson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2017
5,118
1,649
46
Utah
✟347,648.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
.....and when was it that the followers of Christ fled Jerusalem and brought the Gospel to the Gentiles? It wasn't at His crucifixion (He'd even told them to wait IN JERUSALEM to wait for the baptism of the Holy Spirit after His crucifixion).

Acts 1:1-4 ~ After His suffering, He presented Himself to them with many convincing proofs that He was alive. He appeared to them over a span of forty days and spoke about the kingdom of God. And while they were gathered together, He commanded them: “Do not leave Jerusalem, but wait for the gift the Father promised, which you have heard Me discuss.



It was when Stephen was martyred that they fled Jerusalem. They needed to abide by the instructions to bring the Gospel to the Jews first (as you're emphasizing). This was all fulfillment of the prophecy of Daniel - the confirmation of His covenant with Daniel's people - the Israelites - and the 70 weeks determined and set aside for them:

Acts 8:1
Saul Persecutes the Church

On that day a great persecution broke out against the church in Jerusalem, and all except the apostles were scattered throughout Judea and Samaria.


8897-70-Week-Prophecy.jpg
Sabbatical cycle ?

37/36
30/29
23/22 => 22/21BC Jubilee year [ Herod the Great starts renovating the Temple ? ]
16/15
9/8
2/1BC
6/7AD [ census of Quirinius ? ]
13/14
20/21
27/28 => 28/29AD Jubilee year
34/35
41/42
48/49
55/56
62/63
69/70
76/77 => 77/78AD Jubilee year

So, if John the Baptist began preaching in the Sabbath year of 27/28 AD, to prepare Judea for the coming Jubilee year of 28/29 AD...

and Jesus preached 3 Passovers in Jerusalem 31/32/33 AD...

then that would basically fully the "covenant with many for 1 seven" and aligns almost perfectly with your chart also
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Erik Nelson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2017
5,118
1,649
46
Utah
✟347,648.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Erik,

Instead of reporting this post to the administrators of this forum, I would like to ask you personally to remove the video of Full-Preterist Don K. Preston from this thread.

I am making the assumption you did not realize Preston is a leading proponent of Full-Preterism.


.
I'm not accepting his conclusions

I'm showing how he's actually supporting conventional partial preterism

His "Resurrection", as he himself defines from Isaiah 27, obviously refers to the spiritual "resurrection" of spiritual Israel as the Church
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,587
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,240.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
  • Statement of Purpose - Eschatology Forum Statement of Purpose
  • Partial Preterism: holds that most eschatological prophecies, such as the destruction of Jerusalem, the Antichrists, the Great Tribulation, and the advent of the Day of the Lord as a "judgment-coming" of Christ, were fulfilled either in AD 70 or during the persecution of Christians under the Emperor Nero.
  • The Second coming and the resurrection of the dead, however, have not yet occurred in the partial preterist system.
  • Amillennialism: "no millennium", rejects the theory that Jesus Christ will have a thousand-year-long, physical reign on the earth. The amillennial viewpoint holds that the thousand years mentioned in Revelation 20 is a symbolic number, not a literal description; that the millennium has already begun and is identical with the current church age.
It is possible to interpret the "resurrection" Mr. Preston highlights as a "spiritual resurrection of [true spiritual] Israel" = "gentiles grafted in to the rootstock of Abraham and trunk of the Jewish Apostles" = Church
Church = "body of Christ" on earth
Church triumphant after all "spiritual stones in spiritual temple" had been scattered by the Crucifixion = Spiritual Resurrection of True Spiritual Israel (John 2:21)

It is possible to distinguish that Spiritual Resurrection of True Spiritual Israel as the Church... from the physical bodily resurrection at Final Judgement after the Second Coming
BABerean2 said:
Erik, Instead of reporting this post to the administrators of this forum, I would like to ask you personally to remove the video of Full-Preterist Don K. Preston from this thread.
I'm not accepting his conclusions

I'm showing how he's actually supporting conventional partial preterism

His "Resurrection", as he himself defines from Isaiah 27, obviously refers to the spiritual "resurrection" of spiritual Israel as the Church
Hello Eric. Good response......
It is called "discernment", and something the pre-70AD Jewish Rulers lacked, as prophecied.

NKJV)
Pro 19:25
Strike a scoffer, and the simple will become wary;
Rebuke one who has understanding, and he will discern knowledge.

Isa 6:10
“Make the heart of this people dull, And their ears heavy, And shut their eyes;
Lest they see with their eyes, And hear with their ears, And understand with their heart, And return and be healed.”

Jhn 9:41

Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would have no sin; but now you say, ‘We see.' Therefore your sin remains.

Mat 16:3 “and in the morning, ‘It will be foul weather today, for the sky is red and threatening.' Hypocrites![fn] You know how to discern the face of the sky, but you cannot discern the signs of the times.
Luk 12:56
Hypocrites! You can discern the face of the sky and of the earth, but how is it you do not discern this time?
Job 15:34 For the congregation of hypocrites shall be desolate, and fire shall consume the tabernacles of bribery.
==============================
According to Josephus's writings, he was also Preterist/Amill..........

The Destruction of Jerusalem - George Peter Holford, 1805AD
Proof that Matthew 24 was fully fulfilled in 70 AD!
Also see:
Rapture refuted
By George Peter Holford
(Written in 1805)

"I consider the Prophecy relative to the destruction of the Jewish nation,
if there were nothing else to support Christianity, as absolutely irresistible."
(Mr. Erskine's Speech, at the Trial of Williams, for publishing Paine's Age of Reason)

PREFACE

History records few events more generally interesting than the destruction of Jerusalem, and the subversion of the Jewish state, by the arms of the Romans. -- Their intimate connexion with the dissolution of the Levitical economy, and the establishment of Christianity in the world ; the striking verification which they afford of so many of the prophecies, both of the Old and New Testament, and the powerful arguments of the divine authority of the Scriptures which are thence derived ; the solemn warnings and admonitions which they hold out to all nations, but especially such as are favoured with the light and blessings of REVELATION ; together with the impressive and terrific grandeur of the events themselves -- are circumstances which must always insure to the subject of the following pages more than ordinary degrees of interest and importance. Many eminent and learned men have employed their pens in the illustration of it ;.........................

Upon the execution of the tract, generally, the public will determine. Usefulness is the writer's main object ; and if a perusal of it shall contribute, under the DIVINE BLESSING, to confirm the wavering faith of only one Christian, or to shake the vain confidence of a single Unbeliever, his labour will be abundantly rewarded.
G.H.
Our Lord now retired to the Mount of Olives, to which place the disciples followed him, in order to make more particular inquiries relative to the time when the calamitous events, foretold by him, would come to pass. We have already intimated, that, the Mount of Olives commanded a full view of Jerusalem and the temple. No situation, therefore, could have been better adapted to give energy to a prediction which related chiefly to their total ruin and demolition.; and if we suppose (and the supposition is highly probable) that our LORD, While in the act of speaking, pointed to the majestic and stupendous edifices, whose destruction he foretold, every word which he then uttered must have been clothed with inexpressible sublimity, and derived from the circumstances of the surrounding scenery a force and effect, which it is not possible adequately to conceive
Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke's Temple/Jerusalem Discourses harmonized- Poll Thread
Matthew 24:3
Yet of Him sitting on the Mount of the Olives, the Disciples came toward to Him according to own saying "be telling to us! when shall these be being? and what the sign of Thy parousia<3952> and full-consummation<4930> of the Age?
Mark 13
:3 And of sitting of Him into the Mount of the Olives over against the Temple,
Peter and James and John and Andrew inquired<1905> of Him according to own 4 Tell us! when these shall be? and what the sign whenever may be being about<3195> all these to be fully-consummated<4931>.
Luke 21:7 They inquire yet of Him saying “Teacher! when then shall these be being?
And what the sign whenever may be being about<3195> these to becoming<1096>?
"Tell us, when shall these things be ? and what shall be the sign when all these things shall be fulfilled ?" Such were the questions of the disciples, in answer to which our LORD condescended to give them a particular account of the several important events that would precede, as well as of the prognostics which would announce, the approaching desolations ; including suitable directions for the regulation of their conduct under the various trials to which they were to be exposed. He commences with a caution : "Take heed," says be, "that no man deceive you ; for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ, and shall deceive many." The necessity for this friendly warning soon appeared ; for within one year after our Lord's ascension, rose Dositheus the Samaritan, who had the boldness to assert that he was the Messiah, of whom Moses prophesied ; while his disciple Simon Magus deluded multitudes into a belief that he, himself, was the " GREAT POWER OF GOD." About three years afterwards another Samaritan impostor appeared, and declared that he would shew the people the sacred utensils, said to have been deposited by Moses, in mount Gerizim. Induced by an idea that the Messiah, their great deliverer, was now come, an armed multitude assembled under him, but Pilate speedily defeated them, and slew their chief. While Cuspius Fadus was procurator in Judea, another deceiver arose, whose name was Theudas. [4] This man actually succeeded s O far as to persuade a very great multitude to take their effects and follow him to Jordan, assuring them, that the river would divide at his command. Fadus, however, pursued their with a troop of horse, and slew many of them, and among the rest the impostor himself, whose head was cut off and carried to Jerusalem. Under the government of Felix, deceivers rose up daily in Judea, and persuaded the people to follow them into the wilderness, assuring them that they should there behold conspicuous signs and wonders performed by the ALMIGHTY...................
If one believes Josephus to be a reliable witness concerning the 70AD destruction of Jerusalem, then how could one not view MUCH if not all of the OD as fulfilled?

JOSEPHUS, OLIVET DISCOURSE AND BOOK OF REVELATION
History of the Destruction of Jerusalem & Josephan Studies Archives


Flavius Josephus, a Jewish priest and Pharisee, was put in command of the national resistance in Galilee at the time of Israel's revolt against Rome. When he was captured at Jotapata; his life was spared upon his prediction to rival Vespasian, that the Roman general would soon become emperor. Upon the fulfillment of this prophecy shortly thereafter, he was commissioned to provide his captors with a history of the Jewish people, although he initially wrote a history of the Roman-Jewish war suited for both a Roman and a Jewish audience. His works, disputed though they may be regarding accuracy, are an indispensable source on the history of Roman Judea..........
======================================
Was Josephus a reliable witness to Jerusalem 70ad?

15 total yes votes.
  1. *
    Yes, it appears he was
    15 vote(s)
    93.8%
  2. I don't think he was
    1 vote(s)
    6.3%
  3. I have not read anything by him
    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Who was Josephus?
    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. I don't know
    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Other
    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. *
    Josephus was correct concerning the fulfillment of the Olivet Discourse
    2 vote(s)
    12.5%
  8. Josephus viewed Revelation as mostly fulfilled
    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
==============================
"Ye will hear of battles and rumors of battles" 1st century concluding in Judea/Jerusalem 70ad

Matthew 24:6
“Yet ye shall be being about to be hearing battles and tidings of battles, be seeing! be not be being troubled<2360>, for is binding to becoming,
but not as yet the End<5056>
========================
Visual Timeline of the Roman-Jewish War ARTchive

CAST OF CHARACTERS: Roman: Emperor Nero | General Vespasian | General Titus | The Roman Army || Jewish: General / Historian Josephus | Factional Leaders in Jerusalem || Administrators of Roman Judea Targets: Jerusalem | Herod's Temple // Maps of the Roman Invasion // Theological Timeline

CHRONOLOGY IMMEDIATELY SURROUNDING THE WAR

Stage 1: Murder of James the Just, "Opposition High Priest" ; Irrevocable Split: 62
Stage 2: General Revolt in Jerusalem ; Zealot Occupation of Masada: August-September 66
Stage 3: The Campaign of Cestius Gallus and the Defeat of the Twelfth Legion: October-November 66
Stage 4: End of Collaborative Government, Priesthood ; General Flight: November 66 - March 67
Part 6: Vespasian Subdues Northern and Western Palestine: December 66 - December 68
Part 7: Three-way Power Struggle within Jerusalem After Roman Retreat: January 68 - May 70
Part 8: Romans Breach City Walls and Leave Jerusalem Desolate: May 10 - September 10, 70
===================
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Erik Nelson
Upvote 0

Erik Nelson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2017
5,118
1,649
46
Utah
✟347,648.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I myself am not advocating Full-Preterism, and am trying to "use his words against him" on this point

why can't we even point out the errors of FP? Aren't their words the best way to argue against them?

The truth doesn't have to hide from falsehood, who might come away convinced by Mr. Preston in the video above? I haven't sufficiently refuted his interpretation of Isaiah 27?

We seriously want FP to be totally taboo, mum's the word? I don't see how that strengthens PP?

I only posted it for you all discussing this topic, are you sure you speak for the entire community? Did you watch the video? Would you? Did I successfully refute his interpretation of "resurrection" in Isaiah 27? Is there some other forum where FP can be critiqued? That's what I would like to find out
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,587
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,240.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
I myself am not advocating Full-Preterism, and am trying to "use his words against him" on this point
Is there some other forum where FP can be critiqued? That's what I would like to find out
Hello Erik.
Yes there is, on the CCT board.
Just do a search for titles "full preterism".

There is even a "safe house" for that view............

Controversial Christian Theology

search results titles "full preterism"

About 1,500 results

Full Preterist Safe House

I am interested in studying Full Preterism
which is not allowed in GT/End Times
no partials - no Mormons - no Muslims - no other eschatology


Partial Preterism, Full Preterism vs Hyper Preterism
September 18, 2019 • 11 posts • 496 views
Controversial Christian Theology
#1 - LittleLambofJesus
Christ, Israel, and the fall of Jerusalem Discussion on Consistent Preterism and the Impact of AD70 as the Terminal Date (2015) I think we need to distinguish between full preterism and hyper-preterism. Full preterism is an ...
11 results in this thread

Full Preterism Pantelism: How dangerous?

March 05, 2018 • 13 posts • 1000 views
Controversial Christian Theology
#1 - ClementofA
How dangerous are Full Preterism & Pantelism? Pantelism - Wikipedia Preterism - Wikipedia ...
24 results in this thread

Eutheos, the Achilles heel of partial preterism (Full Preterism)

September 25, 2016 • 10 posts • 690 views
Controversial Christian Theology
#1 - random person
In Matthew 24:29, Jesus said, "Immediately after the tribulation of those days" the Son of Man would come in power and great glory, and, "he will send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they will gather His elect from the four ...
10 results in this thread

What is "Everlasting Righteousness"? (Full Preterism)

September 26, 2016 • 1 post • 218 views
Controversial Christian Theology
#1 - random person
Why was Israel promised everlasting righteous? In order to properly understand Daniel's prophecy of the arrival of the world of everlasting righteousness, we must understand Daniel, and thus Israel's standing under Torah, the Mosaic ...

What Is The First Resurrection? (Full Preterism)

October 25, 2016 • 1 post • 1000 views
Controversial Christian Theology
#1 - random person
David Chilton when he wrote this was an amillennial partial preterist but had since converted to full preterism before his death.] Jesus Christ is reigning now (Acts of the Apostles 2:29-36; Revelation 1:5). David Chilton, Days of ...

Every Eye Shall See Him (Full Preterism)

October 01, 2016 • 4 posts • 751 views
Controversial Christian Theology
#1 - random person
Will the second coming of Christ entail a 5'5"-7" Jewish man (common male height of the time) appearing in the skies above Jerusalem that every man, woman, and child will witness across the whole globe? Or did Jesus mean something else ...
4 results in this thread

Full Preterism On The Last Trumpet

September 15, 2015 • 89 posts • 2783 views
Controversial Christian Theology
#1 - random person
89 results in this thread

List Of God's Promises To Stand Upon (Full Preterism)

September 16, 2016 • 3 posts • 614 views
Controversial Christian Theology
#1 - random person
Here is a collection of promises found in the Scripture for covenantal eschatologists to stand upon: And when the Lord smelled the pleasing aroma, the Lord said in his heart, “I will never again curse the ground because of man, for the ...
3 results in this thread
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Erik Nelson
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

tampasteve

Pray for peace in Israel
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Angels Team
CF Senior Ambassador
Site Supporter
May 15, 2017
25,350
7,327
Tampa
✟775,296.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
MOD HAT ON

A few OT and Disruptive posts have been deleted. If you are going to make a report, just make a report. discussing it, or threatening one is Disruptive Behavior.

Also, Full Preterism is not allowed, partial is. Discussion of it is Off Topic and a SOP vio for this forum.
MOD HAT OFF​
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.