Are you only going to be convinced of the fulfillment of this passage when islands grow legs and run away and mountains disappear?Then every island fled away, and the mountains were not found.
Upvote
0
Are you only going to be convinced of the fulfillment of this passage when islands grow legs and run away and mountains disappear?Then every island fled away, and the mountains were not found.
Parousia70 said:The Thessalonicans were being persecuted by the Jews who were stirring up violence against them in their city (see Acts 17:1-14).
What Parousia70 is doing is allowing Scripture to interpret Scripture and it's a wise thing to do.klutedavid said:That is beyond the scope of the OP.
The passage you quoted (Acts 17:1-14) does not necessarily imply that the suffering the Thessalonians endured, was directed by the Jews. You must quote from the context of the letter (2 Thessalonians) more precisely, otherwise you will be applying an interpretation to the text.
Yes, intense heat as if when a person is burned to death.....JLB777 said: ↑
And this shall be the plague with which the Lord will strike all the people who fought against Jerusalem:
Their flesh shall dissolve while they stand on their feet, Their eyes shall dissolve in their sockets, And their tongues shall dissolve in their mouths.
Zechariah 14:12
Their flesh shall dissolve while they stand on their feet,
This described intense heat. JLB
- Their eyes shall dissolve in their sockets,
Keras, Revelation is not worldwide. Quit spreading that futuristic sci-fi nonsenseThis is an event BEFORE the Return. It refers to the Sixth Seal worldwide disaster by fire from the sun.
Could be acid?
But why argue? Revelation 19:17-21, is perfectly clear; Jesus will use the Sword of His Word and the corpses will be edible by the wild birds.
Isaiah 66:15-17 cannot be related to the Return. It is the Lord's Day of fiery wrath against the nations, the Sixth Seal worldwide devastation that commences all the prophesied end time events.
Followed by our gathering into all of the holy Land. Isaiah 66:18b-21 Why is it so hard for people to see these truths?
The Jews were searching for Paul and Silas in Acts 17. Jason and the others merely accepted them into their home, so the guilt of these Gentiles (Jason) was guilt by association with Paul and Silas (Jews).What Parousia70 is doing is allowing Scripture to interpret Scripture and it's a wise thing to do.
Acts 17 *is* from the context of the letters to the Thessalonians:
In Thessalonica
1 When Paul and his companions had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a Jewish synagogue.
2 As was his custom, Paul went into the synagogue, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures,
3 explaining and proving that the Messiah had to suffer and rise from the dead. “This Jesus I am proclaiming to you is the Messiah,” he said.
4 Some of the Jews were persuaded and joined Paul and Silas, as did a large number of God-fearing Greeks and quite a few prominent women.
5 But other Jews were jealous; so they rounded up some bad characters from the marketplace, formed a mob and started a riot in the city. They rushed to Jason’s house in search of Paul and Silas in order to bring them out to the crowd.
6 But when they did not find them, they dragged Jason and some other believers before the city officials, shouting: “These men who have caused trouble all over the world have now come here,
7 and Jason has welcomed them into his house. They are all defying Caesar’s decrees, saying that there is another king, one called Jesus.”
8 When they heard this, the crowd and the city officials were thrown into turmoil.
9 Then they made Jason and the others post bond and let them go.
Why does it matter to you whether or not it was the Jews that were stirring up the persecution? This was a confusing time period of transition (all within the rule of the oppressive Roman empire). The letters to the Thessalonians didn't place limits on who would be punished for persecuting them and Paul, Timothy, and Silvanus ( ALL their persecutors would be punished - ISTM):The Jews were searching for Paul and Silas in Acts 17. Jason and the others merely accepted them into their home, so the guilt of these Gentiles (Jason) was guilt by association with Paul and Silas (Jews).
The Jews were never pursuing Jason as Jason was merely an ignorant Gentile.
The Thessalonian letters never mentions the law and every other Pauline epistle mentions the law. Paul never guards the Thessalonians from the threat of the Jewish legalism.
The persecution is involving Roman rule (and that goes back to the crucifixion as well - when it was said "we have no king but Caesar" - John 19:15).Paul never guards the Thessalonians from the threat of the Jewish legalism.
Indeed mkgal.Why does it matter to you whether or not it was the Jews that were stirring up the persecution? This was a confusing time period of transition (all within the rule of the oppressive Roman empire). The letters to the Thessalonians didn't place limits on who would be punished for persecuting them and Paul, Timothy, and Silvanus ( ALL their persecutors would be punished - ISTM):
2 Thessalonians 1:6-7 ~ it is only right for God to repay with affliction those who afflict you, and to grant relief to you who are oppressed and to us as well, when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven
Hello mkgal. Preterist Archives also has great info on the Jewish Wars.More backstory and how enmeshed the ancient religious system became with the Roman government:
The Sadducees apparently practiced a form of cooperation since it was Rome who kept them securely in their position over the Temple and therefore over the people (John 11:49-50).
The Jewish Revolts
Visual Timeline of the Roman-Jewish War ARTchiveThis will be a thread dedicated to the events wars/battles occurring during the last days leading up the "consummation" of the OC Jewish Age as prophecied in Daniel and the Olivet Discourse.
Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke's Temple/Jerusalem Discourses harmonized- Poll Thread
Matthew 24:
3 Yet of Him sitting on the Mount of the Olives, the Disciples came toward to Him according to own saying "be telling to us!
when shall these be being?
and what the sign of Thy parousia<3952> and full-end/consummation<4930> of the Age?
6 “Yet ye shall be being about to be hearing of battles and tidings of battles, be seeing! be not be being troubled<2360>, for is binding to becoming,
but not as yet the End<5056>..........
I will go check it out Thanks.Hello mkgal. Were you and others aware that I have 2 threads on the Jewish Wars/Rebellion in connection with the Olivet Discourse and Armageddon in Revelation?
I really need more members, especially preterists/amills to vote and respond on these. Thanks
Are you only going to be convinced of the fulfillment of this passage when islands grow legs and run away and mountains disappear?
I'm not joking about the text - I was pointing out the personification language there.Ask me that same question when both of us have been resurrected from the dead, and you witness the greatest earthquake in the history of the planet.
Words have meaning. You can make a joke about the text if you want to. That is your decision.
Here's a map I found that shows the ancient Roman empire (and there ARE islands there):
Islands fleeing is figurative language.Find the tracks produced when the islands moved and we will know you are correct.
.
Why not those you have listed, then everyone since then up until Christ returns? Which would include ppl 2000+ years later, but would also include ppl 100+ years later, 500+ years later, 1000+ years later, so on and so on.
mkgal1 said: ↑
And there WAS lots of fire at the destruction of Jerusalem in the 1st century:
BABerean2 said: ↑
Then every island fled away, and the mountains were not found.
mkgal1 said: ↑
Are you only going to be convinced of the fulfillment of this passage when islands grow legs and run away and mountains disappear?
Ok..........start a thread on Earthquakes in the Bible.......Ask me that same question when both of us have been resurrected from the dead, and you witness the greatest earthquake in the history of the planet.
The supernatural event described in the Book of Revelation will make the Yellowstone eruption look like a minor event.
mkgal1 said: ↑Here's a map I found that shows the ancient Roman empire (and there ARE islands there):
BABerean2 said: ↑
Find the tracks produced when the islands moved and we will know you are correct.
Islands fleeing is figurative language.
David Chilton: 20 In this final judgment, every false refuge disappears; the mountains and rocks no longer can hide the wicked “from the face of Him who sits on the Throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb” (6:16): Every island fled away, and the mountains were not found. ~ David Chilton, The Days of Vengeance: An Exposition of the Book of Revelation (1987).
How one cannot see 1st century 70ad Jerusalem in Revelation 18 is beyond me..........
Yeah. And you take that as literal?Revelation 18:21 And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.
If this is meaning Jerusalem in 70 AD, why is it that Jerusalem can still be found, even in our day and time? Obviously when the text indicates...and shall be found no more at all....it literally means for forever once this verse is fulfilled.
There were unbelieving Jews occupying Jerusalem at the time of it's destruction in 70 AD. Today in our day and time there are also unbelieving Jews occupying this same Jerusalem. But how though if it shall be found no more for forever, that assuming the events concerning 70 AD can be found in Revelation 18, thus already fulfilled?
I believe you misunderstood my quote:The three plain descriptions about the Return of Jesus; Zechariah 14:3, Matthew 24:30 and Revelation 19:11-21 do not mention fire at all, He destroys the attacking armies by the Sword of His Word and the bodies are not burned; the birds feast on them.
You have inaccurately interpreted scripture and confuse the Lord's Day of fiery wrath, the Sixth Seal event, with the Return. Two different Days, years apart.
The three plain descriptions about the Return of Jesus; Zechariah 14:3, Matthew 24:30 and Revelation 19:11-21 do not mention fire at all, He destroys the attacking armies by the Sword of His Word and the bodies are not burned; the birds feast on them.
You have inaccurately interpreted scripture and confuse the Lord's Day of fiery wrath, the Sixth Seal event, with the Return. Two different Days, years apart.
The three plain descriptions about the Return of Jesus; Zechariah 14:3, Matthew 24:30 and Revelation 19:11-21 do not mention fire at all, He destroys the attacking armies by the Sword of His Word and the bodies are not burned; the birds feast on them.
You have inaccurately interpreted scripture and confuse the Lord's Day of fiery wrath, the Sixth Seal event, with the Return. Two different Days, years apart.