He gave you the intelligence that is required to formulate these questions... and..... the tools to answer them.Too bad He didn’t teach us Hebrew to understand it.
Upvote
0
He gave you the intelligence that is required to formulate these questions... and..... the tools to answer them.Too bad He didn’t teach us Hebrew to understand it.
What is it that about this account that leads you to believe that it's an allegory?1. It’s
2. An
3. Allegory
Sorry but Scripture does support a global flood! Reread Genesis 7:17-to end of chapter.Scripture doesn't support a global flood either. That is merely an interpretation of various passages. Many cultures have an unbroken history which was unaffected by the flood. There is also zero evidence in nature of a global flood.
It was a big flood and it killed a lot of people but it was not global.
Sorry but Scripture does support a global flood! Reread Genesis 7:17-to end of chapter.Scripture doesn't support a global flood either. That is merely an interpretation of various passages. Many cultures have an unbroken history which was unaffected by the flood. There is also zero evidence in nature of a global flood.
It was a big flood and it killed a lot of people but it was not global.
Thats nice biblically and mythologicaly. But homo sapiens sapiens came from Africa 100,000 years ago and other hominides like Neandhertals were in Europe 450,000 years ago.
So there is an obvious problem when we take the ancient Hebrew worldview and make it a scientific one...
By examining their data and conclusions.How can we be sure that science has that right?
Or that we do not live in Matrix, in some alien computer game etc. Well, we are limited by the data we got, we have nothing more to work with.How can we be sure that time is linear or that the creation was spoken into being with inherent time in a creative instant - like the wine at Canna - a vintage in an instant. Science is a good pursuit but in some areas theories become arrogant.
By examining their data and conclusions.
Science is not a tool. Science is knowledge. Science uses various tools to get the knowledge - observation, experiments, measurements etc.That is a circular argument. Using a tool to validate the tool you are using...
Mmmm.
The "science" of evolution uses assumption and skips over things that it cannot explain, prove or reproduce....Science is not a tool. Science is knowledge. Science uses various tools to get the knowledge - observation, experiments, measurements etc.
Where did he build it, where did it land, and when did it happen?
Science is wrong.Thats nice biblically and mythologicaly. But homo sapiens sapiens came from Africa 100,000 years ago and other hominides like Neandhertals were in Europe 450,000 years ago.
So there is an obvious problem when we take the ancient Hebrew worldview and make it a scientific one...
No.Same with the gospel... as it is in the same canonical book, called the word of God.... right?
That is incorrect.I 100% believe that people only believe in the numerous miracles and supernatural events that encompass the life of Christ... for one reason and one reason only... The salvation of their soul depends on it.
Thats nice biblically and mythologicaly. But homo sapiens sapiens came from Africa 100,000 years ago and other hominides like Neandhertals were in Europe 450,000 years ago.
So there is an obvious problem when we take the ancient Hebrew worldview and make it a scientific one...
Perhaps you've confused faith in Jesus Christ with faith in bible passages?If this was not the case.. they would conclude that Christ never walked on water, that He fed the 5000 with another method, or it was a myth, didn't turn water into wine... didn't heal the little girl from miles away, didn't raise Lazarus from the dead, and that He died but they just didn't find the body...
Really?It's all apostate sacrilege.
I built this timeline in the long ago.... Estimated dates....
4300 BC - Creation of Adam
2640 BC - The Great Flood
2060 AD - Christ’s coming
3100 AD - End of millennial and destruction of planet earth
I have man on this planet 7,400 years, and would put the accuracy of these dates within 400 years....
Noah's dad Lamech complained of a cursed ground... " And he called his name Noah, saying, This same shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the Lord hath cursed." - Genesis 5:29
Taking the timeline of the church in parallel with the generations of Adam there was a severe famine during the time Noah was born. I would imagine a time of famine during the time of the Black Horseman, which days I believe we now live in....
As far as Isaac Newton’s 2060AD quote he said....
“It may end later, but I see no reason for its ending sooner. This I mention not to assert when the time of the end shall be, but to put a stop to the rash conjectures of fancifull men who are frequently predicting the time of the end, & by doing so bring the sacred prophesies into discredit as often as their predictions fail. Christ comes as a thief in the night, & it is not for us to know the times & seasons which God hath put into his own breast." - Isaac Newton
So please use the 2060AD quote as a close estimation and not an exact date.
If you think the Biblical record of the Flood is just another Middle Eastern myth, then you have to believe that the whole of the book of Genesis is a myth as well and not really God's inspired record of events.We know nothing of the sort. That is a one flood myth - not even the original one - all of which are without any evidence whatsoever.
Well, you are saying on one hand that God inspired Moses to write Genesis, and on the other hand you are saying that parts of it are just folk tales. That does not compute to me at all.Why do I have to say that?