Dispensationalism - Open Discussion

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
9,810
5,656
Utah
✟721,719.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Dispensation Theology Discussion

This thread is not for those who are "faint of heart" (so to speak).

Firstly, I am not a proponent of dispensational teaching, but do seek others learning and understanding about it. That is ... people believe differently for reasons ... what are those reasons and what biblical support and historical support is there for those reasons.

The Schofield bible is referenced herein, the reason for this is because classic dispensationalism began with John Nelson Darby. Darby was succeeded by the theologian C. I. Scofield. and then of course there was the wide distribution of the fictional Left Behind series of books based on dispensational teachings. Some of the "roots" of dispensational teachings.

Many are not aware of the magnitude of the error of modern dispensationalism.
Nor do many realize how widespread is the influence (stemming from)the Scofield Reference Bible and it's proponents.

Many teachers of truth are not alert to the trend of the times in the religious world. New issues (and or forgotten ones) must be faced. Errors must be exposed.

It is important to visit and/or re-visit history as well. People have forgotten and/or are not aware of the "roots" of certain theologies/teachings (especially "protestants") ... that is ... where did the different teachings come from? How did they "evolve". Being ill informed/not informed/confused ... stemming from their own laziness or ignorance (or both) to do research on their own. Not all ... but many.

Dispensationalism - Wikipedia

The teaching of Schofield and Darby (either in part or in whole) has/is being taught in various denominations to varying degrees, whether the actual Schofield bible is used within these denominations or not.

It is understood there are various view points on the topic(s). The goal here is to provide information regarding the topic(s). That is information. Please leave personal comments, remarks out of the discussion(s). Everyone is free to believe what they believe. This thread is after the why.

*** In an effort to try and hopefully provide a more "organized" method of discussion and the ability to more easily follow them ... please quote the numbered referenced paragraph (along with it's title) at the beginning of all your response(s) and whether you agree or disagree. One topic point per post please ... Then adding additional information/narrative regarding that topic point, while providing biblical scripture references to support your biblical viewpoint. If providing historical information, include those links as well. ***

The following is certainly not an exhaustive study but rather bringing forth seven points for discussion as a starting point.

I am prayerful all will at least visit or revisit any actual scripture posted by anyone and think deeply upon them ... His Word is truth and is always the means by which we are to discern His truth.

With all that being said, I put for the following points for discussion, individual research, study and consideration:


1. Meaning of Dispensationalism

In the Bible the word "dispensation" never refers to a period of time. Invariably its meaning is "a stewardship," "the act of dispensing," "an administration." Read the four New Testament texts in which the word "dispensation" is found: 1 Corinthians 9:17 - Ephesians 1:10 - Ephesians 3:2 and Colossians 1:25 . Weymouth's translation of
1 Corinthians 9:17 reads: "A stewardship has nevertheless been entrusted to me."

The plan of the ages is a gospel plan. God's dealings with man have been ever the same. Faithful Abel and Enoch, Abraham and Moses, were all "saved by grace." Their lives were marked by obedience to God's commandments. By "faith," they obeyed (out of love) ... and also true of today (and in the future) God's remnant church is a church (all believers) who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.

Revelation 14:12

New Living Translation
This means that God’s holy people must endure persecution patiently, obeying his commands (out of love for Him and for no other reasons) and maintaining their faith in Jesus.

John 14:15
New Living Translation
“If you love me, obey my commandments. (doing so out of love of Him)

2. Antinomian

Antinomian (definition) 1 : one who holds that under the gospel dispensation of grace (1a) the moral law is of no use or obligation because faith alone is necessary to salvation.

— Says the Scofield Bible - "The law is a ministry of condemnation, death, and the divine curse." ( Scofield Bible - PDF commentary provided herein for reference if wanted) But your Bible and mine says that the "law is holy, and the commandments holy, and just, and good." Three times Paul, exclaims "God forbid," as he guards against the error of antinomianism Romans 3:31 Galatians 3:21 Romans 7:7 - When the Holy Spirit declares that "the law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul," it seems unthinkable for anyone to call it a "ministry of condemnation".

3. The Antichrist

The dispensationalist has reversed the historic Protestant position in regard to the antichrist, and it's teaching stems from the counter reformation with two of it's major proponents and teachings being from Francisco Rebira and Manuel Lacunza

Francisco Ribera - Wikipedia

and Manuel Lacunza

Manuel Lacunza - Wikipedia

Rebira and Lacunza declared that the antichrist was a man yet to come who would rule for three and one-half years at a future period of "tribulation." Dispensationalists are being proponents of these teachings or at least some of them.

4. "Secret Rapture"

The teaching regarding "secret rapture," or the silent taking away of the church before the time of trouble. Note well the sequence of events in Matthew 24:30 and Matthew 24:31 The gathering of the elect (verse 31) follows the coming of Christ in glory and power (verse 30). There is a misleading of the use of the words "parousia" and "apokalupsis." The very word translated "coming" in Matthew 24:27 and 1 Thessalonians 4:15 is the Greek word "parousia." "Lightning," "voice," "shout" are words which describe the "parousia."

5. Return of Jews

The teaching of the hope of the restoration of the Jewish nation at Jerusalem. The promises to the Jewish nation were all conditional on obedience. God did all that He could ever do for the Jews in sending them His prophets and finally His Son. He did not cast away His people. The very first Christian churches in apostolic times were made up almost entirely of Jews. The Israel of God, to whom the promises are made, is spiritual Israel. To Abraham and his seed belong the promises. "If ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise." It is not based on the blood inherited through Abraham ... but through the blood of Christ ... those are His Israel ... His people.

Read Romans 4:13; Romans 9:6-8; Galatians 3:29; Romans 4:8-12, 17; Galatians 3:7-9. Then read Hosea 13:9, 10, 14, and other Old Testament prophecies, to see that the hope of the ages for Israel (His people) was through the resurrection from the dead.

6. Postponement of the Kingdom

More than one hundred times did the Lord Jesus refer to the kingdom; only twice to the church. His message was a kingdom message. "Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand" Matthew 3:2 was the message of John the Baptist. It was also the burden of Jesus, of the twelve, and of the seventy who were sent forth as the ministers of Jesus Matthew 4:17; Matthew 10:7; Luke 10:9 - The door of entrance into the kingdom is not through racial inheritance, but through the new birth John 3:3, 5 - Citizenship in the kingdom of grace belongs to Gentiles as well as to Jews. Ephesians 2:19 - Even now we are translated into the kingdom of grace Colossians 1:13 . We have been brought out of darkness into His light.

At the second coming, the saints enter the kingdom of glory Daniel 7:27. The Scofield teachings, postpones the "kingdom" to an age to come and makes it a possession of natural Jews rather than that of all who are in Christ.

7. "Second Chance"

The teaching of a more favorable opportunity for salvation during the millennium is in error. "Behold, now is the accepted time." The world is now having its "second chance." Beyond the grave there is no hope of salvation Isaiah 38:18 . Before the second coming of Christ, probation's hour will have closed for eternity Matthew 13: 38-43 - Matthew 25:31-46 Revelation 22:11, 12

Edited: Moderators, if this post is not in the correct place, please move it.
 
Last edited:

drstevej

"The crowd always chooses Barabbas."
In Memory Of
Mar 18, 2003
47,493
27,114
74
Lousianna
✟1,001,611.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I am not up for a debate but I have a ThM degree from a dispensational seminary (Dallas Seminary) and a PhD from a covenant theology (Westminster Seminary, Philly). I am a dispensationalist because I think it best summarizes the nature of fulfillment of the promises to ethnic Israel.

The History of Dispensational Theology - SLJ Institute
 
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,381
Sydney, Australia.
✟244,844.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I am not up for a debate but I have a ThM degree from a dispensational seminary (Dallas Seminary) and a PhD from a covenant theology (Westminster Seminary, Philly). I am a dispensationalist because I think it best summarizes the nature of fulfillment of the promises to ethnic Israel.

The History of Dispensational Theology - SLJ Institute
Are you a Calvinist, Reformed, Presbyterian?

Not sure that you can combine this reformed interpretation of the scripture with the more literal dispensation interpretation?
 
Upvote 0

drstevej

"The crowd always chooses Barabbas."
In Memory Of
Mar 18, 2003
47,493
27,114
74
Lousianna
✟1,001,611.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are you a Calvinist, Reformed, Presbyterian?

Not sure that you can combine this reformed interpretation of the scripture with the more literal dispensation interpretation?

I am a solid 4 point Calvinist, non-denominational pastor (retired) affirm believer's baptism. I have done a wedding or two at Scofield Memorial Church but did not attend there.
BTW Westminster didn't require students to be Reformed in their theology. They did require a thorough knowledge of it. While there I did not debate the issue with fellow students.
 
Upvote 0

Francis Drake

Returning adventurer.
Apr 14, 2013
4,000
2,508
✟184,952.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Independence-Party
I was given a Scofield bible by a friend many years ago, and I really love it and enjoy all the notes etc.
My current one must be my fourth or fifth copies as I invariably break the spine and they eventually fall apart.
My bibles are always filled with my red ink notes and my own cross references that Scofield had missed, and each time I replace the bible, I go through and transfer all these personal workings so as not to lose them.

However, A good part of my red ink is scribbling out Scofield's Dispensational stuff, as over the years, I began to realise it mostly wasn't right.
 
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,381
Sydney, Australia.
✟244,844.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I am a solid 4 point Calvinist, non-denominational pastor (retired) affirm believer's baptism. I have done a wedding or two at Scofield Memorial Church but did not attend there.
BTW Westminster didn't require students to be Reformed in their theology. They did require a thorough knowledge of it. While there I did not debate the issue with fellow students.
A four point Calvinist?

Poor John Calvin would turn in his grave after hearing that.

Still there appears to be a fundamental conflict in these two interpretations of the scripture.

Calvinism is an interpretation of the scripture based on the premise of God's sovereignty. A Calvinist reads the Bible through the glasses of God's sovereignty alone. Hence, the scripture is ultimately an interpretation of that sovereign will of God. I thought Calvinism also held to covenant theology?

Dispensationalism claims to hold to a literal interpretation of the scripture, minus the emphasis on God's sovereignty. Thus a Dispensational interpretation will be different to the interpretation applied by Calvinism. Because Dispensationalism is not a Covenant theology.

Protestant denominations that embrace covenant theology as a whole tend to reject dispensationalism. For example, the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.) (which subsequently merged with the United Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. (PCUSA), in which dispensationalism existed) termed it "evil and subversive" and regarded it as a heresy. (wikipedia)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A four point Calvinist?

Poor John Calvin would turn in his grave after hearing that.

Still there appears to be a fundamental conflict in these two interpretations of the scripture.

Calvinism is an interpretation of the scripture based on the premise of God's sovereignty. A Calvinist reads the Bible through the glasses of God's sovereignty alone. Hence, the scripture is ultimately an interpretation of that sovereign will of God. I thought Calvinism also held to covenant theology?

Dispensationalism claims to hold to a literal interpretation of the scripture, minus the emphasis on God's sovereignty. Thus a Dispensational interpretation will be different to the interpretation applied by Calvinism. Because Dispensationalism is not a Covenant theology.

Protestant denominations that embrace covenant theology as a whole tend to reject dispensationalism. For example, the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.) (which subsequently merged with the United Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. (PCUSA), in which dispensationalism existed) termed it "evil and subversive" and regarded it as a heresy. (wikipedia)
I don’t see a contradiction of being a 5 pointer and holding to a literal interpretation of Holy Scriptures. The Reformers did in vast majority hold to either a historic futurist view or A-millennial view.

The OP does touch on a point where some ultra Dispensationalists have allowed their doctrine to redefine when the church actually began. Traditional Dispensationalists hold to the traditional Acts 2 and Pentecost. The more modern ultra Dispensationalists hold to either a Mid Acts or post Acts 28 beginning of the church. This creates what they call the division of the Gospel of Grace from the Gospel of the Kingdom. Which is easily refuted quoting Paul from throughout Acts.

So I’m Reformed and a futurist who believes in a literal millennial kingdom as described in Revelation 20 and throughout the OT prophets.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Dispensation Theology Discussion

This thread is not for those who are "faint of heart" (so to speak).

Firstly, I am not a proponent of dispensational teaching, but do seek others learning and understanding about it. That is ... people believe differently for reasons ... what are those reasons and what biblical support and historical support is there for those reasons.

The Schofield bible is referenced herein, the reason for this is because classic dispensationalism began with John Nelson Darby. Darby was succeeded by the theologian C. I. Scofield. and then of course there was the wide distribution of the fictional Left Behind series of books based on dispensational teachings. Some of the "roots" of dispensational teachings.

Many are not aware of the magnitude of the error of modern dispensationalism.
Nor do many realize how widespread is the influence (stemming from)the Scofield Reference Bible and it's proponents.

Many teachers of truth are not alert to the trend of the times in the religious world. New issues (and or forgotten ones) must be faced. Errors must be exposed.

It is important to visit and/or re-visit history as well. People have forgotten and/or are not aware of the "roots" of certain theologies/teachings (especially "protestants") ... that is ... where did the different teachings come from? How did they "evolve". Being ill informed/not informed/confused ... stemming from their own laziness or ignorance (or both) to do research on their own. Not all ... but many.

Dispensationalism - Wikipedia

The teaching of Schofield and Darby (either in part or in whole) has/is being taught in various denominations to varying degrees, whether the actual Schofield bible is used within these denominations or not.

It is understood there are various view points on the topic(s). The goal here is to provide information regarding the topic(s). That is information. Please leave personal comments, remarks out of the discussion(s). Everyone is free to believe what they believe. This thread is after the why.

*** In an effort to try and hopefully provide a more "organized" method of discussion and the ability to more easily follow them ... please quote the numbered referenced paragraph (along with it's title) at the beginning of all your response(s) and whether you agree or disagree. One topic point per post please ... Then adding additional information/narrative regarding that topic point, while providing biblical scripture references to support your biblical viewpoint. If providing historical information, include those links as well. ***

The following is certainly not an exhaustive study but rather bringing forth seven points for discussion as a starting point.

I am prayerful all will at least visit or revisit any actual scripture posted by anyone and think deeply upon them ... His Word is truth and is always the means by which we are to discern His truth.

With all that being said, I put for the following points for discussion, individual research, study and consideration:


1. Meaning of Dispensationalism

In the Bible the word "dispensation" never refers to a period of time. Invariably its meaning is "a stewardship," "the act of dispensing," "an administration." Read the four New Testament texts in which the word "dispensation" is found: 1 Corinthians 9:17 - Ephesians 1:10 - Ephesians 3:2 and Colossians 1:25 . Weymouth's translation of
1 Corinthians 9:17 reads: "A stewardship has nevertheless been entrusted to me."

The plan of the ages is a gospel plan. God's dealings with man have been ever the same. Faithful Abel and Enoch, Abraham and Moses, were all "saved by grace." Their lives were marked by obedience to God's commandments. By "faith," they obeyed (out of love) ... and also true of today (and in the future) God's remnant church is a church (all believers) who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.

Revelation 14:12

New Living Translation
This means that God’s holy people must endure persecution patiently, obeying his commands (out of love for Him and for no other reasons) and maintaining their faith in Jesus.

John 14:15
New Living Translation
“If you love me, obey my commandments. (doing so out of love of Him)

2. Antinomian

Antinomian (definition) 1 : one who holds that under the gospel dispensation of grace (1a) the moral law is of no use or obligation because faith alone is necessary to salvation.

— Says the Scofield Bible - "The law is a ministry of condemnation, death, and the divine curse." ( Scofield Bible - PDF commentary provided herein for reference if wanted) But your Bible and mine says that the "law is holy, and the commandments holy, and just, and good." Three times Paul, exclaims "God forbid," as he guards against the error of antinomianism Romans 3:31 Galatians 3:21 Romans 7:7 - When the Holy Spirit declares that "the law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul," it seems unthinkable for anyone to call it a "ministry of condemnation".

3. The Antichrist

The dispensationalist has reversed the historic Protestant position in regard to the antichrist, and it's teaching stems from the counter reformation with two of it's major proponents and teachings being from Francisco Rebira and Manuel Lacunza

Francisco Ribera - Wikipedia

and Manuel Lacunza

Manuel Lacunza - Wikipedia

Rebira and Lacunza declared that the antichrist was a man yet to come who would rule for three and one-half years at a future period of "tribulation." Dispensationalists are being proponents of these teachings or at least some of them.

4. "Secret Rapture"

The teaching regarding "secret rapture," or the silent taking away of the church before the time of trouble. Note well the sequence of events in Matthew 24:30 and Matthew 24:31 The gathering of the elect (verse 31) follows the coming of Christ in glory and power (verse 30). There is a misleading of the use of the words "parousia" and "apokalupsis." The very word translated "coming" in Matthew 24:27 and 1 Thessalonians 4:15 is the Greek word "parousia." "Lightning," "voice," "shout" are words which describe the "parousia."

5. Return of Jews

The teaching of the hope of the restoration of the Jewish nation at Jerusalem. The promises to the Jewish nation were all conditional on obedience. God did all that He could ever do for the Jews in sending them His prophets and finally His Son. He did not cast away His people. The very first Christian churches in apostolic times were made up almost entirely of Jews. The Israel of God, to whom the promises are made, is spiritual Israel. To Abraham and his seed belong the promises. "If ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise." It is not based on the blood inherited through Abraham ... but through the blood of Christ ... those are His Israel ... His people.

Read Romans 4:13; Romans 9:6-8; Galatians 3:29; Romans 4:8-12, 17; Galatians 3:7-9. Then read Hosea 13:9, 10, 14, and other Old Testament prophecies, to see that the hope of the ages for Israel (His people) was through the resurrection from the dead.

6. Postponement of the Kingdom

More than one hundred times did the Lord Jesus refer to the kingdom; only twice to the church. His message was a kingdom message. "Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand" Matthew 3:2 was the message of John the Baptist. It was also the burden of Jesus, of the twelve, and of the seventy who were sent forth as the ministers of Jesus Matthew 4:17; Matthew 10:7; Luke 10:9 - The door of entrance into the kingdom is not through racial inheritance, but through the new birth John 3:3, 5 - Citizenship in the kingdom of grace belongs to Gentiles as well as to Jews. Ephesians 2:19 - Even now we are translated into the kingdom of grace Colossians 1:13 . We have been brought out of darkness into His light.

At the second coming, the saints enter the kingdom of glory Daniel 7:27. The Scofield teachings, postpones the "kingdom" to an age to come and makes it a possession of natural Jews rather than that of all who are in Christ.

7. "Second Chance"

The teaching of a more favorable opportunity for salvation during the millennium is in error. "Behold, now is the accepted time." The world is now having its "second chance." Beyond the grave there is no hope of salvation Isaiah 38:18 . Before the second coming of Christ, probation's hour will have closed for eternity Matthew 13: 38-43 - Matthew 25:31-46 Revelation 22:11, 12
A decent rundown but there’s a whole lot more to Darby-Schofield then left behind.

Try looking at the works of John Walvoord
 
Upvote 0

food4thought

Loving truth
Site Supporter
Jul 9, 2002
2,929
725
50
Watervliet, MI
✟383,729.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
His eleos1954! I hope both sides can tone down the rhetoric enough to have a civil discussion.
4. "Secret Rapture"

The teaching regarding "secret rapture," or the silent taking away of the church before the time of trouble. Note well the sequence of events in Matthew 24:30 and Matthew 24:31 The gathering of the elect (verse 31) follows the coming of Christ in glory and power (verse 30).

Matthew 24:30-31 is obviously speaking of the 2nd coming. The rapture is mentioned later in the chapter:

Matthew 24:36-42 NIV "But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. (37) As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. (38) For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; (39) and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. (40) Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. (41) Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left. (42) "Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come.
I am not stressing the one taken, another left, BTW... I know the common retort on that (but think the context demands it speaking of the rapture). What I want to stress here is that everything appears to happening as normal right up to the event described. A cursory reading of Revelation 6-19 tells us that this is impossible! The whole world will be in turmoil due to the judgments of God and the wars precipitated by the Antichrist. Also, note that verse 42 says we won't know the day the Lord will come, yet Daniel 12:11 indicates that we will know the day once the abomination of desolation is set up. To me, these facts just solidify the teaching of a pre-trib rapture.

There is a misleading of the use of the words "parousia" and "apokalupsis." The very word translated "coming" in Matthew 24:27 and 1 Thessalonians 4:15 is the Greek word "parousia." "Lightning," "voice," "shout" are words which describe the "parousia."

The rapture is a coming of the Lord, and so is His visible coming to earth. This is the most reasonable explanation for these Scriptures, as well as some others. Take this one, for example:

1 Thessalonians 5:9 NIV For God did not appoint us to suffer wrath but to receive salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ.​

Is there any question that the tribulation is a time when God's wrath is poured out on the earth? How can the church go through the tribulation when God is pouring out His wrath? Because of this, it seems to me that the rapture event must happen at some point before the outbreak of God's wrath. This eliminates the post-trib rapture from consideration in my mind.

Looking forward to your thoughtful reply;
Michael

 
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,381
Sydney, Australia.
✟244,844.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I don’t see a contradiction of being a 5 pointer and holding to a literal interpretation of Holy Scriptures.
A literal interpretation of the scripture and Calvinism?

This cannot true.

Calvinism is an interpretation of the scripture.

You certainly do not read the scripture at face value because your Calvinist premise logically determines, how you will interpret any text in the scripture. Here is an example of the application of an interpretation to a text.

Romans 9:11
For though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose according to His choice would stand...

A Calvinist interpretation will see God's sovereign choice for the purpose of election in that verse above.

A literal interpretation will merely see God's choice in accordance with His purpose in Christ.

Can you see the different interpretations of that verse?
The Reformers did in vast majority hold to either a historic futurist view or A-millennial view.
That was their interpretation of the scripture not necessarily what was written in the scripture.
So I’m Reformed and a futurist who believes in a literal millennial kingdom as described in Revelation 20 and throughout the OT prophets.
You have an interpretation of the scripture which is a Reformed interpretation.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,381
Sydney, Australia.
✟244,844.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
His eleos1954! I hope both sides can tone down the rhetoric enough to have a civil discussion.


Matthew 24:30-31 is obviously speaking of the 2nd coming. The rapture is mentioned later in the chapter:

Matthew 24:36-42 NIV "But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. (37) As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. (38) For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; (39) and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. (40) Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. (41) Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left. (42) "Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come.
I am not stressing the one taken, another left, BTW... I know the common retort on that (but think the context demands it speaking of the rapture). What I want to stress here is that everything appears to happening as normal right up to the event described. A cursory reading of Revelation 6-19 tells us that this is impossible! The whole world will be in turmoil due to the judgments of God and the wars precipitated by the Antichrist. Also, note that verse 42 says we won't know the day the Lord will come, yet Daniel 12:11 indicates that we will know the day once the abomination of desolation is set up. To me, these facts just solidify the teaching of a pre-trib rapture.



The rapture is a coming of the Lord, and so is His visible coming to earth. This is the most reasonable explanation for these Scriptures, as well as some others. Take this one, for example:

1 Thessalonians 5:9 NIV For God did not appoint us to suffer wrath but to receive salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ.​

Is there any question that the tribulation is a time when God's wrath is poured out on the earth? How can the church go through the tribulation when God is pouring out His wrath? Because of this, it seems to me that the rapture event must happen at some point before the outbreak of God's wrath. This eliminates the post-trib rapture from consideration in my mind.

Looking forward to your thoughtful reply;
Michael

May I suggest you also quote from the text (Luke 21) As your quotation (Matthew 24:36-48) compresses two separate events into one event. Matthew combines the destruction of the temple with the return of the Christ. Whereas Luke has two defined ages, the termination of the nation of Israel and then the age of the Gentiles, before Christ returns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: food4thought
Upvote 0

food4thought

Loving truth
Site Supporter
Jul 9, 2002
2,929
725
50
Watervliet, MI
✟383,729.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
May I suggest you also quote from the text (Luke 21) As your quotation (Matthew 24:36-48) compresses two separate events into one event. Matthew combines the destruction of the temple with the return of the Christ. Whereas Luke has two defined ages, the termination of the nation of Israel and then the age of the Gentiles, before Christ returns.

Thank you, klutedavid. Here is the verse that stands out to me from Luke 21:

Luke 21:36 NIV Be always on the watch, and pray that you may be able to escape all that is about to happen, and that you may be able to stand before the Son of Man."​

Why pray to "escape all that is about to happen" if the church is going to go through it? It seems to me that this is another indication that the rapture will happen pre-trib.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You certainly do not read the scripture at face value because your Calvinist premise logically determines, how you will interpret any text in the scripture. Here is an example of the application of an interpretation to a text.
I believe you are incorrect here. The truth is drawn out of Scriptures by exegesis. Not reading into the text an idea as do Arminianism with its eisegesis
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Romans 9:11
For though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose according to His choice would stand...

A Calvinist interpretation will see God's sovereign choice for the purpose of election in that verse above.

A literal interpretation will merely see God's choice in accordance with His purpose in Christ.
Perhaps if Reformed relied on proof texts instead of considering the entire thought, passage and theme of what Paul was speaking of here.
If you take Romans 9-11 then it becomes clear what he was teaching. That God is sovereign in all His choosing.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,381
Sydney, Australia.
✟244,844.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Thank you, klutedavid. Here is the verse that stands out to me from Luke 21:

Luke 21:36 NIV Be always on the watch, and pray that you may be able to escape all that is about to happen, and that you may be able to stand before the Son of Man."​

Why pray to "escape all that is about to happen" if the church is going to go through it? It seems to me that this is another indication that the rapture will happen pre-trib.
I thought the church does go through the tribulation as the two verses before your verse suggests.

Luke 21:34-35
...and that day will not come on you suddenly like a trap; for it will come upon all those who dwell on the face of all the earth.
 
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,381
Sydney, Australia.
✟244,844.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I believe you are incorrect here. The truth is drawn out of Scriptures by exegesis. Not reading into the text an idea as do Arminianism with its eisegesis
Someone has their wires crossed here.

Exegesis is critical explanation or interpretation of a text, especially of scripture. Exegesis itself is an interpretation of the scripture. This is the point that I am making; that all church movements apply an interpretation or exegesis to the scripture.

A premise is a previous statement or proposition from which another is inferred or follows as a conclusion.

An interpretation that is based on the idea of God's sovereignty as the primary premise is an exegesis of the scripture and is called Calvinism.

You cant sit there and tell me that Calvinism is not an exegesis of the scripture?
 
Upvote 0

food4thought

Loving truth
Site Supporter
Jul 9, 2002
2,929
725
50
Watervliet, MI
✟383,729.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I thought the church does go through the tribulation as the two verses before your verse suggests.

Luke 21:34-35
...and that day will not come on you suddenly like a trap; for it will come upon all those who dwell on the face of all the earth.

I can see how you could look at it that way, but verse 36 clearly indicates that some will "escape all that is about to happen". The way I understand it, "those who dwell on the earth" is speaking of worldly people, in contrast with the disciples who have their citizenship in heaven (Phillipians 3:20).

Edit----------------------------------

Do a word search for "earth" and "dwell" in the book of Revelation for some insight on the earth dwellers.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,381
Sydney, Australia.
✟244,844.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Perhaps if Reformed relied on proof texts instead of considering the entire thought, passage and theme of what Paul was speaking of here.
If you take Romans 9-11 then it becomes clear what he was teaching. That God is sovereign in all His choosing.
God may very well be sovereign over all His creation and His will is absolute. But that does not automatically remove love and forgiveness from the exegesis. After all is said and done, and above all, God is love.

Be very careful with any premise that you hold onto while you read the text. Many a fool has entered an inquisition with a flawed interpretation of the scripture, and unfortunately never returned.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,381
Sydney, Australia.
✟244,844.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I can see how you could look at it that way, but verse 36 clearly indicates that some will "escape all that is about to happen". The way I understand it, "those who dwell on the earth" is speaking of worldly people, in contrast with the disciples who have their citizenship in heaven (Phillipians 3:20).
That is an interpretation that your presenting and is incorrect. The opposite reading of these verses is true of course.

These three verses quoted are talking about not wasting yourself in loose living before that day arrives. These verses are directed at the disciples not at Herod and Caesar or the world.

Jesus is simply saying don't waste your life in worldly pursuits, otherwise that day when it occurs will catch you out.
 
Upvote 0