- Jan 27, 2009
- 5,896
- 8,325
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
In today’s post-truth world’, mistakes, and more precisely, doctrinal mistakes move about freely with their author's feet never really being ‘held to the fire’. Critical reviews on those lesser infractions barely leave a mark while the more blatantly erroneous “Strange-Fire” and the rogue over-critical authors of the “Name it Claim it” movement pump out more and more lucrative teaching videos on YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. More than enough capital to further impose spiritual carnage, namely, the removal of our estate in the liberty and strength in Him.
What name might we place on these authors’ liberty to foster such un-checked teachings? I wouldn’t be so concerned with that nearly as much as I would the strange unity they all share.
The two above yet well-known examples I gave for instance may not fully agree with each other, but both wish to refuse portions assigned to the Christian we have clear liberty to enjoy.
The over-correction therefore is held in place by spiritual and doctrinal bias and continues to thrive and be nurtured in my view, by the absence of soundness’ concerted voice – you the Church.
All full-gospel thoughts welcome, thanks!
What name might we place on these authors’ liberty to foster such un-checked teachings? I wouldn’t be so concerned with that nearly as much as I would the strange unity they all share.
The two above yet well-known examples I gave for instance may not fully agree with each other, but both wish to refuse portions assigned to the Christian we have clear liberty to enjoy.
The over-correction therefore is held in place by spiritual and doctrinal bias and continues to thrive and be nurtured in my view, by the absence of soundness’ concerted voice – you the Church.
All full-gospel thoughts welcome, thanks!