Losing my religion, where is the evidence for God

seeker0

Member
Jul 29, 2019
10
0
Nebraska
✟16,715.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Ahh but does it?

Adam, (according to the Biblical account in Genesis 2:4-7), was made the same day that God made the heavens and the earth. Genesis 1:5, (if you care to read it that way), before plants or herbs, and before it ever rained on earth. No man existed to plough or till the ground and only mist was available to provide moisture for the garden God had yet to plant, to the east of Eden, wherever that might have been.

God then put Adam in the garden to till it and keep it. God then made animals for Adam to name and to find a mate, of which none were found suitable, because God decided Adam needed a companion.

So all the animals and birds etc. get made before Eve, but Adam is made long before any animal or bird and even before vegetation or rain. Adam in fact names the animals and birds as they get made.

I don't know about you but I have spotted a number of contradictions already with Genesis 1:1-31. And ALL this happens in The Day that God made the heavens and the earth.

Given that the Hebrew word name 'Adam' is not a Christian name, but rather the generic name of a species, meaning 'The Human Race', it is highly likely that what we are studying here is a STORY, with a legendary meaning, rather than 'literal history', like you might read about The American Civil War or Voyages of John Cabot. Or even, for that matter like The Books of Kings or Chronicles, found in the same 'biblical library' as Genesis Chapters 1, Chapters 2-4, or The Book of Nehemiah.

It then becomes our task to try to understand what might have been meant by 'The tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil', 'The tree of life', (Obviously far more than just 'trees', since they have names and particular 'spiritual' fruit). Also what might be meant by 'Death' and "In the day that you eat of it, you shall 'die'. Adam did not physically die the day he ate it. He died many years after eating it. Adam did not have 'Eternal life' before he ate of that tree either. God expelled them both from the Garden expressly to prevent Adam and 'Eve' from obtaining 'Eternal life' while in their mortal state. Genesis 3:22-24. So it is unlikely that 'physical, mortal death' is what is being considered here. It is "Spiritual Death" that was visited upon them the day the couple in the story tasted the forbidden 'fruit'. Being 'Dead to God' is a condition of everyone who is not 'born again' from the mythic "Adam" to the present time.

Being born of water is not enough to 'give us life'. WE must be 'born of The Spirit'. WE must be born anew. Physical death is just a natural consequence of being physically alive. Jesus had to exit this life by the self same way that we all do. John 14:4. We have a natural 'life span'. Spiritual 'death' is a consequence of being alienated from God by the sin of disobedience, of which we are all as guilty as Adam and Eve, (i.e. The Human Race), "As in Adam all die, so in Christ shall all be made alive". Christ was the only one to ever have 'Life'. because He always obeyed the Father and did the Father's will. None of the human race ever does that consistently. That is why 'in Adam' all die. Yet 'in Christ' shall all be made alive. It is only though His Spirit that we can live to God. Galatians 2:19-20.



The Bible does not claim to be "The Word of God" or even the "word of God". A book in the bible, (2 Timothy), claimed scripture to be "inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness to equip us for good works." When that was written the Bible did not exist anywhere on earth as a Book. The Bible is a collection of ancient writings which first came together around 365 AD and was not fully complete until after 400 AD, so even Two Timothy 3:16-17 does not refer to "The Bible" as such but actually only to some of those 'scriptures' which eventually became accepted by The Church, as 'inspired' by God.



By inspiration of The Holy Spirit, who will lead you into all truth. John 16:8-15.

Believe all parts to be speaking to you via The Holy Spirit. Just don't take everthing, especially the parables of Jesus, literally. They are obviously not intended to be literally, historically, 'true'. They are spiritually 'true' though, and those who take them 'literally' never understand them. They look but do not 'see' and listen but do not 'hear'. Such are those who are 'dead to God'.
.


Interesting interpretations of Genesis. So if Adam (or mankind) had not chosen the "fruit" and had rather chosen to continually obey God, would man still die physically? I mean I agree and recognize that there was a spiritual death upon disobedience. Or perhaps your interpretation is that we each individually disobey God and "fall" and thereby earn ourselves death both spiritual and physical? This theology is new to me is why I'm asking. (Is there a particular name for your interpretation, so that I might google it at some point? I have told myself that if I find "macro" evolution to be true, then I would next look into how people reconcile evolution and the Bible; but I am still on the first part.) ...I guess I'd be more curious to ask, who do you believe were the very first homosapiens (or ancestors) to be spiritual or have a soul or an eternal destination? And what was the generation like just before them? (Alluding to my prior question about "Adam's parents", though in the context of your interpretation of "Adam", which I was aware meant "man".)

...Oh interesting, you don't even believe that the Bible is the words of God. You and I have lived in very different circles :) .

Yes I am aware that parables are not to be taken literally :)

I'm curious what you think of my "bigger" question from before:

if we came about through natural processes from the first single-cell eukaryote or something simpler, all the way to us, then why is there any need to believe that there are any supernatural interventions at work in our lives at all? Why is there a need to believe in a God? Why not deism or atheism? My "problem" is not that I don't want to serve God, but rather that I just want to know if there really is a God to serve. I want to follow truth and nothing less, even if that means being an atheist or agnostic.
 
Upvote 0

seeker0

Member
Jul 29, 2019
10
0
Nebraska
✟16,715.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
what does proof of God look like to you?

If you don't know how will you know if you found it?

What if God, is not the sort of being you think him to be would your definition of proof be expansive enough for God to provide you with something you are not expecting?

let's say upon meeting God you have always been tld he will greet you with a pink donut with 15 sprinkles on it. is your proof this donut with 15 sprinkles? or could he do something for you personally that you would know that only you and God shared that?

For me, if we can evolve from mere molecular processes, then it just doesn't seem reasonable or necessary to believe in God or a god of any sort. And if evolution did not happen, then I see no other explanation for this amazingly functional world beyond an all-knowing, personal God. In other words for me determining whether biological "macro" evolution happened would essentially prove or disprove God. Understand that proof, for creatures of limitation as ourselves, is about probability rather than a miraculous event, much like "proof" in the courtroom. Yes there is a chance I could be wrong, but I'd rather accept the most likely belief.

Granted, strong historical evidence of something like the resurrection of Christ, would also be something. But considering the large question marks over the biblical manuscripts, as well as the manuscripts that barely didn't make it into the cannon, that would be quite difficult. I've read a few books on those subjects, but it would take much deeper study to find personal assurance either way.
 
Upvote 0

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Site Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,475
USA
✟677,608.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
So if Adam (or mankind) had not chosen the "fruit" and had rather chosen to continually obey God, would man still die physically?

In Eden, they would have had access to the tree of life that would have granted them eternal life.
 
Upvote 0

ruthiesea

Well-Known Member
Oct 5, 2007
714
504
✟71,668.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
From a non-Christian:
My religion starts with the given that the one true G-d exists.

Genesis 1:1
בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶץ׃
When God began to create heaven and earth—

There is no explanation about His beginning, nature, etc. There is no empirical evidence or information given that can be studied scientifically for confirming or denying His existence. Science involves evidence; religion involves belief. Either you believe or you do not.

“For Judaism, the search for religious certainty through science or metaphysics is not merely fallacious but ultimately pagan. To suppose that G-d is scientifically provable is to identify G-d with what is observable, and this for Judaism is idolatry.” ~ Lord Jonathan Sacks

Or, to put it another way:
“The hand of God may well be all around us, but it is not, nor can it be, the task of science to dust for fingerprints.” ~ Robert L. Dorit

If you are looking for evidence for G-d, then you have already lost your belief in Him.
 
Upvote 0

ExTiff

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2018
481
99
78
Southampton
✟41,282.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Interesting interpretations of Genesis. So if Adam (or mankind) had not chosen the "fruit" and had rather chosen to continually obey God, would man still die physically? I mean I agree and recognize that there was a spiritual death upon disobedience. Or perhaps your interpretation is that we each individually disobey God and "fall" and thereby earn ourselves death both spiritual and physical? This theology is new to me is why I'm asking. (Is there a particular name for your interpretation, so that I might google it at some point? I have told myself that if I find "macro" evolution to be true, then I would next look into how people reconcile evolution and the Bible; but I am still on the first part.) ...I guess I'd be more curious to ask, who do you believe were the very first homosapiens (or ancestors) to be spiritual or have a soul or an eternal destination? And what was the generation like just before them? (Alluding to my prior question about "Adam's parents", though in the context of your interpretation of "Adam", which I was aware meant "man".)

...Oh interesting, you don't even believe that the Bible is the words of God. You and I have lived in very different circles :) .

Yes I am aware that parables are not to be taken literally :)

I'm curious what you think of my "bigger" question from before:

So if Adam (or mankind) had not chosen the "fruit" and had rather chosen to continually obey God, would man still die physically? I mean I agree and recognize that there was a spiritual death upon disobedience. Or perhaps your interpretation is that we each individually disobey God and "fall" and thereby earn ourselves death both spiritual and physical?

Q1. So if Adam (or mankind) had not chosen the "fruit".

First off, the question is not the kind of question one should ask of Genesis Ch2-5. It is the same as asking "If little Red Riding Hood had refused to take the picnic basket to Granny, would the wolf not have eaten her"? The question implies that we can change the story to make it mean what we want to believe rather than simply what it says. It is a STORY and we are not permitted to mess with what it actually says. To do that implies that we think it is 'historical' rather than 'mythic'. We can speculate on possible alternative 'historical' outcomes, but 'mythic' narrative is immutable and fixed, otherwise it becomes a completely different 'myth' with a completely different 'meaning'. God intends the 'mythic' story of how evil entered the world and turned us against God, introduced fear and guilt, blame and blame shifting, into the human psyche, destroying our relationship with our creator and our relationships with each other, to remain just exactly as it is. Don't even try to change what it says. It says exactly what God intended it to say. It is 'Inspired' scripture.

So, God asked a question, Adam blamed Eve, Eve blamed the snake, and the snake didn't have a leg to stand on, a blame shifting tendency all too prevalent in the world today, in every human personality type. THAT is the message we are intended to get from the story.

Q2. we each individually disobey God and "fall" and thereby earn ourselves death both spiritual and physical?

We are of course each entirely responsible for our own sins against God. Psalms 51:4-6. The important fact that we need to keep in sight is that we have ALL sinned, not that a mythic or historical someone, a long time ago, started doing it, (whether that happened in a garden with a talking snake rather misses the point), it is a fact about US, which WE cannot and should not deny, and it has far reaching detrimental consequences to our well being, both temporal and eternal. It is probably, (as creatures intended to be spiritually 'Eternal'), responsible for our fear of physical 'death'. Death in the physical sense is merely a necessary process inevitably linked to 'change, growth and development'. It may be traumatic but no more so than birth is also traumatic as an experience for both mother and baby. Physical death is, according to scripture, merely entering into another, more enhanced, form of existence. An existence similar to the one Christ now has.

Q3. who do you believe were the very first homosapiens (or ancestors) to be spiritual or have a soul or an eternal destination? And what was the generation like just before them? (Alluding to my prior question about "Adam's parents", though in the context of your interpretation of "Adam", which I was aware meant "man".)
Someone somewhere in the distant past obtained sufficient cognisance to realise that they were going to die, and it would not be a good experience. Someone at sometime used this 'knowledge' to try to extend their own life at the expense of others, thus setting in motion the 'dog eat dog' attitude of modern man, having replaced the 'Trust in God or 'fate' attitude" of his predecessors.

...Oh interesting, you don't even believe that the Bible is the words of God. You and I have lived in very different circles.

I believe that God's Word cannot be locked up in any 'Book' even the Bible. What happens when a person reads The Bible, in a search for truth, is that the Holy Spirit communicates meaning to the person reading the words. It is not the words which are coming from God, it is the understanding of the meaning of the words which comes from God. There are quite a few 'words' in The Bible which are most definitely not God's words. Job 1:7, Job 1:9, Job 2:2, Job 2:4, etc. + all the temptations of Christ are Satans words, not God's. Discernment! We need to be discerning.


Q4. if we came about through natural processes from the first single-cell eukaryote or something simpler, all the way to us, then why is there any need to believe that there are any supernatural interventions at work in our lives at all? Why is there a need to believe in a God?

Because we need to be born again, in order to 'live' to fulfil our truly God given potential as human beings. We need first to believe that God exists and then to believe that God rewards those who seek Him. Hebrews 11:6.

Why not deism or atheism? My "problem" is not that I don't want to serve God, but rather that I just want to know if there really is a God to serve. I want to follow truth and nothing less, even if that means being an atheist or agnostic.

As far as God is concerned, He does not much care whether we are religious or not. He cares whether we are fulfilling our purpose, and His purpose in us. That purpose will be similar to the purposes of His only beloved Son Jesus Christ, so a short cut to discovering our Divinely ordained 'purpose' is to get to know Jesus Christ. He is The Word, The Way, The Truth and The Life. John 14:6.

Anyone therefore who follows the teaching of The Word, seeks to find and follow God's Way, respects and upholds The Truth, and lives The Life that Christ himself has enabled us to Live 'through' Him by His atonement for ALL, is "Doing what God expects of them".

While on earth Jesus Christ, "Went about doing good". While on earth God expects nothing less of each of us. Acts of the Apostles 10:38.

That is the bottom line of 'Faith'. God has done everything necessary for our salvation. We hopefully still have time then, to use the time God has given us, to do as Jesus did.
.
 
Upvote 0

seeker0

Member
Jul 29, 2019
10
0
Nebraska
✟16,715.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
From a non-Christian:
My religion starts with the given that the one true G-d exists.

Genesis 1:1
בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶץ׃
When God began to create heaven and earth—

There is no explanation about His beginning, nature, etc. There is no empirical evidence or information given that can be studied scientifically for confirming or denying His existence. Science involves evidence; religion involves belief. Either you believe or you do not.

“For Judaism, the search for religious certainty through science or metaphysics is not merely fallacious but ultimately pagan. To suppose that G-d is scientifically provable is to identify G-d with what is observable, and this for Judaism is idolatry.” ~ Lord Jonathan Sacks

Or, to put it another way:
“The hand of God may well be all around us, but it is not, nor can it be, the task of science to dust for fingerprints.” ~ Robert L. Dorit

If you are looking for evidence for G-d, then you have already lost your belief in Him.

Briefly, that all seems like a gross misinterpretation of my position. I never claimed G-d could be scientifically provable or disprovable. If religion is belief without evidence then I simply have no reason to believe it, regardless of whether people call me an idolater or pagan or anything else. (No offense intended.) The fact that there is anything at all though does serve as evidence to me that there is a metaphysical cause to the physical universe, which may be G-d.
 
Upvote 0

seeker0

Member
Jul 29, 2019
10
0
Nebraska
✟16,715.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
First off, the question is not the kind of question one should ask of Genesis Ch2-5. It is the same as asking "If little Red Riding Hood had refused to take the picnic basket to Granny, would the wolf not have eaten her"? The question implies that we can change the story to make it mean what we want to believe rather than simply what it says. It is a STORY and we are not permitted to mess with what it actually says. To do that implies that we think it is 'historical' rather than 'mythic'. We can speculate on possible alternative 'historical' outcomes, but 'mythic' narrative is immutable and fixed, otherwise it becomes a completely different 'myth' with a completely different 'meaning'. God intends the 'mythic' story of how evil entered the world and turned us against God, introduced fear and guilt, blame and blame shifting, into the human psyche, destroying our relationship with our creator and our relationships with each other, to remain just exactly as it is. Don't even try to change what it says. It says exactly what God intended it to say. It is 'Inspired' scripture.

So, God asked a question, Adam blamed Eve, Eve blamed the snake, and the snake didn't have a leg to stand on, a blame shifting tendency all too prevalent in the world today, in every human personality type. THAT is the message we are intended to get from the story.



We are of course each entirely responsible for our own sins against God. Psalms 51:4-6. The important fact that we need to keep in sight is that we have ALL sinned, not that a mythic or historical someone, a long time ago, started doing it, (whether that happened in a garden with a talking snake rather misses the point), it is a fact about US, which WE cannot and should not deny, and it has far reaching detrimental consequences to our well being, both temporal and eternal. It is probably, (as creatures intended to be spiritually 'Eternal'), responsible for our fear of physical 'death'. Death in the physical sense is merely a necessary process inevitably linked to 'change, growth and development'. It may be traumatic but no more so than birth is also traumatic as an experience for both mother and baby. Physical death is, according to scripture, merely entering into another, more enhanced, form of existence. An existence similar to the one Christ now has.


Someone somewhere in the distant past obtained sufficient cognisance to realise that they were going to die, and it would not be a good experience. Someone at sometime used this 'knowledge' to try to extend their own life at the expense of others, thus setting in motion the 'dog eat dog' attitude of modern man, having replaced the 'Trust in God or 'fate' attitude" of his predecessors.



I believe that God's Word cannot be locked up in any 'Book' even the Bible. What happens when a person reads The Bible, in a search for truth, is that the Holy Spirit communicates meaning to the person reading the words. It is not the words which are coming from God, it is the understanding of the meaning of the words which comes from God. There are quite a few 'words' in The Bible which are most definitely not God's words. Job 1:7, Job 1:9, Job 2:2, Job 2:4, etc. + all the temptations of Christ are Satans words, not God's. Discernment! We need to be discerning.




Because we need to be born again, in order to 'live' to fulfil our truly God given potential as human beings. We need first to believe that God exists and then to believe that God rewards those who seek Him. Hebrews 11:6.



As far as God is concerned, He does not much care whether we are religious or not. He cares whether we are fulfilling our purpose, and His purpose in us. That purpose will be similar to the purposes of His only beloved Son Jesus Christ, so a short cut to discovering our Divinely ordained 'purpose' is to get to know Jesus Christ. He is The Word, The Way, The Truth and The Life. John 14:6.

Anyone therefore who follows the teaching of The Word, seeks to find and follow God's Way, respects and upholds The Truth, and lives The Life that Christ himself has enabled us to Live 'through' Him by His atonement for ALL, is "Doing what God expects of them".

While on earth Jesus Christ, "Went about doing good". While on earth God expects nothing less of each of us. Acts of the Apostles 10:38.

That is the bottom line of 'Faith'. God has done everything necessary for our salvation. We hopefully still have time then, to use the time God has given us, to do as Jesus did.
.

Huh that is a curious position, that Gen 2-5 is an inspired myth, merely to teach not to blameshift. I could have learned that merely from my experiences at work, without the Bible.

and the snake didn't have a leg to stand on

lol :)

Physical death is, according to scripture, merely entering into another, more enhanced, form of existence.

I still hope so. (Though I can't simply choose to believe it just because I want it to be true.)

Someone somewhere in the distant past obtained sufficient cognisance to realise that they were going to die, and it would not be a good experience. Someone at sometime used this 'knowledge' to try to extend their own life at the expense of others, thus setting in motion the 'dog eat dog' attitude of modern man, having replaced the 'Trust in God or 'fate' attitude" of his predecessors.

Don't even simple animals have the "dog eat dog" mentality, the mentality of competition, preferring the individual's own survival over that of others? And how could such mentality "replace" trust in God if it is a simpler concept than recognizing some abstract or intangible entity that controls fate?

Here's what makes more sense to me right now: before modern science, when we did not have the capability to understand that evolution happened, it only made sense to attribute the apparent design to a Designer, and thus mankind imagined and worshiped all sorts of gods, some monotheistic though most polytheistic. Now we see that natural selection can selectively choose from random chance to obtain the order we see today, and there is thus no need for a design explanation at least since the Big Bang. Yet theistic belief is still widely held, at least for now, because of the strong sociological and cultural influences on, and cognitive bias of, individuals. I see no good reason from what you have given, to believe that the Bible is inspired by God. I think many of its teachings are very insightful and true according to how the human psyche works and the interpersonal consequences of our actions, both positive and negative.

It's amazing the wide variety of discordant beliefs held by many intelligent people. Strong evidence that we are our own worst enemies in deception.
 
Upvote 0

ExTiff

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2018
481
99
78
Southampton
✟41,282.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
It's amazing the wide variety of discordant beliefs held by many intelligent people. Strong evidence that we are our own worst enemies in deception.

What you say seems eminently testable. Why not go with it?

Huh that is a curious position, that Gen 2-5 is an inspired myth, merely to teach not to blameshift. I could have learned that merely from my experiences at work, without the Bible.

The Genesis narrative of Ch.2-5 says a whole lot more about human psychology than you have imagined. However it was never probably intended to provide humankind with a historical account of actual physical events. It is more likely a mythic and mystic account explaining psychiatric archetypes common to the human spiritual condition before the essential 'spiritual regeneration' has taken place. John 3:1-21.
.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0