So what? They added the words "his" and "their" too. And YOU added capitals to those words.
Amen. I always try to capitalize His, Their, Trinity, God, Jesus, Holy Spirit, Lord and any other term referring to God AND I'm proud of it.
Upvote
0
So what? They added the words "his" and "their" too. And YOU added capitals to those words.
Just the fact you cherry-pick things you think agree with you and ignore everything else is a refutation in and of itself.
Citation required.
People have been saying that they are in the last days of planet Earth for centuries. They've all been wrong, what makes you think you're right?
Amen. I always try to capitalize His, Their, Trinity, God, Jesus, Holy Spirit, Lord and any other term referring to God AND I'm proud of it.
The big problem you now have is that you have painted yourself into a corner by claiming the translators added to the bible in such away as to alter its meaning (something which is specifically called out as being a sin). Do you want to stick to your claim that the translators sinned and that they have altered the bible? If you do, then you also need to accept that your exegesis is founded on a faulty translation and is, therefore, worthless and wrong. Or do you want to withdraw that claim and accept that the commas do not alter the meaning of the bible in any way? In that case your exegesis is refuted as I have demonstrated. Either way, you lose.
Aman777 will respond with more dishonest dancing, backtracking and handwaving in 3-2-1........
At the time when the King James bible was produced it was normal to separate each item in a list by a comma including before the 'and'. So the commas were not wrong. It is since then that it became good style to omit the comma before the 'and.'
Not to mention people in past centuries have faced far worse conditions than we face today and thus have had far more reason to think they lived in the last days.
Comparatively speaking, the current generation is quite well off.
I think I missed those, been away for a while. Links?
Sure...so does the Young's Literal Translation version of the Bible. Yet they DIDN'T capitalize those words in those verses....because they don't refer to god. They refer to the nouns already mentioned in the sentence.
With your reverential capitalization, you are adding meaning to the text that isn't there.
False accusation which cannot be supported.
Yes, as you mentioned them specifically.You seem to be thinking about Science and Genetics.
The problem I have with today's scientific consensus is the flawed ToE, which CANNOT explain How or When mindless Nature inserted the Supreme Intelligence of Creation Genesis 3:22 into Apes.
No idea what that is supposed to mean.Evolutionists claim that Human intelligence can be changed APART from the sexual process, but cannot seem to find ANY evidence of this unsupported assertion.
Ah, so when you mentioned 'genetics' it was just this naive folk genetics, that is, 'genetics' that has not bearing to actual genetics.Genetically, today's Humans (Nephiyl or the descendants of Adam AND prehistoric people (sons of God) Genesis 6:4 have the intelligence of God AND the DNA of prehistoric people and chromosome 2 fusion confirms this. Genesis 6:4 Amen?
False accusation which cannot be supported.
The current generation is the last generation before Jesus returns
Weak reply. Why not just throw up your hands and admit that you CANNOT refute God's Holy Word?
Ah, so when you mentioned 'genetics' it was just this naive folk genetics, that is, 'genetics' that has not bearing to actual genetics.
I already have supported it. Translators, who, unlike you, understand ancient Hebrew, did not capitalize the words. I'll take that, and a trivially basic understanding of how to read English, over your manufactured, pet theory interpretation any day of the week.
It is you who cannot support your claim that those words should be capitalized. Literally nothing in the Hebrew text suggests that they should be.
Indeed, not a single, solitary Bible version unambiguously agrees with you. In fact, you rely on the KJV precisely because it adds the ambiguity that you need, using "his" instead of "its."
I could not even find another version which renders the word "his" instead of "its."
And this, despite the fact that you admit that the translators of the KJV were not living in the time of "increased knowledge."
Your ridiculous interpretation relies on a centuries old ENGLISH grammar mechanism that has fallen out of favor.
Many previous generations claimed the same thing. They were all wrong. There is no reason to assume that your claim is any different than theirs.
I'm not talking about "god's holy word". I'm speaking specifically about your claims that everything you believe with respect to the Bible lines with science, history, genetics, etc.
This is obviously false given that you flat out disregard everything in those areas of human knowledge that contradicts your claims about your Biblical beliefs.
The least you can do is be honest about that. But I suppose that is asking too much.