No criminal activity by Comey.

I just love silly ploys

Albion said:

It's fascinating to read how the DOJ declining to prosecute Comey is turned by him into "no wrongdoing." That's despite the laundry list given in the USAToday article of "wrongdoings" committed by him.

Click to expand...

This President is probably researching the "family trees" of these DOJ officials to determine if any of them came from ******** countries or have Mexican/Muslim sounding surnames that would make their judgement suspect!

Their boss, Attorney Genera Barr, will also incur "The Donald's" wrath for violating Trump's "what have you done for ME lately" principle - not only did the Epstein fiasco happen on his watch, but allowing these DOJ officials to take a loyalty oath to the Constitution, instead of this President!

jgarden said:

This President is probably researching the "family trees" of these DOJ officials to determine if any of them came from ******** countries or have Mexican/Muslim sounding surnames that would make their judgement suspect!

Their boss, Attorney Genera Barr, will also incur "The Donald's" wrath for violating Trump's "what have you done for ME lately" principle - not only did the Epstein fiasco happen on his watch, but allowing these DOJ officials to take a loyalty oath to the Constitution, instead of this President!

Click to expand...

I find it amazing how the Left is always ready to theorize about what the Right MIGHT HAVE DONE, while refusing to even examine all the HARD PROOF of outright criminal activity by the Left.

Biblewriter said:

I find it amazing how the Left is always ready to theorize about what the Right MIGHT HAVE DONE, while refusing to even examine all the HARD PROOF of outright criminal activity by the Left.

Click to expand...

"Hard proof" in Trump's world is an "alien concept!"

Biblewriter said:

I find it amazing how the Left is always ready to theorize about what the Right MIGHT HAVE DONE, while refusing to even examine all the HARD PROOF of outright criminal activity by the Left.

Click to expand...

I am always amazed how the Right theorizes away what IT HAS DONE while assigning all it does in fact to the left. Clinton walked. Comey walked So many Trump righties were accused, tried, convicted, and punished. And the Trump criminals will be caught and prosecuted.

Biblewriter said:

I find it amazing how the Left is always ready to theorize about what the Right MIGHT HAVE DONE, while refusing to even examine all the HARD PROOF of outright criminal activity by the Left.

Click to expand...

What hard proof of outright criminal activity?

JohnAshton said:

I am always amazed how the Right theorizes away what IT HAS DONE while assigning all it does in fact to the left. Clinton walked. Comey walked So many Trump righties were accused, tried, convicted, and punished. And the Trump criminals will be caught and prosecuted.

Click to expand...

Yet not even one Trump associate was convicted of anything even related to the election, the campaign, or anything done during the Trump Administration.

Arcangl86 said:

What hard proof of outright criminal activity?

Click to expand...

Perjury, leaking, and fraud.

Yarddog said:

Actually, no. At least not yet. We have to let the IG reveal what that investigation revealed.

Click to expand...

We know they did it. We are awaiting formal recognition of what we already know.

Albion said:

It's fascinating to read how the DOJ declining to prosecute Comey is turned by him into "no wrongdoing." That's despite the laundry list given in the USAToday article of "wrongdoings" committed by him.

Click to expand...

That is exactly what happened with Trump with the Mueller report. It was a litany of wrong doing. Yet, Trump still repeats that there was "no collusion" despite Mueller stating “We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term[...]"

Snoder said:

That is exactly what happened with Trump with the Mueller report. It was a litany of wrong doing. Yet, Trump still repeats that there was "no collusion" despite Mueller stating “We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term[...]"

Click to expand...

Did you personally read it? Or is that just what the Media told you? The only thing that the Muller report contained (connected with either the Trump campaign or activities of the Trump Administration) that could even be interpreted as wrongdoing was possible obstruction. And Obstruction, to be criminal, must be an attempt to cover up a crime. Yet zero evidence was found that an underlying crime had been committed.

The Mueller Investigation was illegal from the start. For there was zero evidence that a crime had even been committed before they began looking for one. And the Special Council law only provides for a Special Council ONLY when there is evidence that a crime has been committed. And the Mueller Report violated all the Prosecutory rules by "not exonerating" the subject of the investigation. Prosecutors do not have the authority to exonerate. They file criminal charges, and prosecute them, or they do not file criminal charges. And that is ALL they have authority to do. To not file charges, yet publish a report implying guilt, is a violation of the ethics rules for prosecutors.

And in the hearings about the report, Muller exposed his own failure to properly investigate the allegations by stating that he "did not know about" Fusion GPS. So, after a two year investigation, he did not even know about the source of the allegations he was investigating? WHAT KIND OF AN INVESTIGATION IS THIS?

Biblewriter said:

Did you personally read it?

Click to expand...

Yes. Did you?

Or is that just what the Media told you? The only thing that the Muller report contained (connected with either the Trump campaign or activities of the Trump Administration) that could even be interpreted as wrongdoing was possible obstruction. And Obstruction, to be criminal, must be an attempt to cover up a crime. Yet zero evidence was found that an underlying crime had been committed.

Click to expand...

It discussed evidence of numerous crimes.

The Mueller Investigation was illegal from the start. For there was zero evidence that a crime had even been committed before they began looking for one. And the Special Council law only provides for a Special Council ONLY when there is evidence that a crime has been committed. And the Mueller Report violated all the Prosecutory rules by "not exonerating" the subject of the investigation. Prosecutors do not have the authority to exonerate. They file criminal charges, and prosecute them, or they do not file criminal charges. And that is ALL they have authority to do. To not file charges, yet publish a report implying guilt, is a violation of the ethics rules for prosecutors.

And in the hearings about the report, Muller exposed his own failure to properly investigate the allegations by stating that he "did not know about" Fusion GPS. So, after a two year investigation, he did not even know about the source of the allegations he was investigating? WHAT KIND OF AN INVESTIGATION IS THIS?

Click to expand...

Stating that the Mueller Investigation was illegal from the start is interesting.
I appreciate your use of CAPS and red text.

I enjoyed trying to make sense out of this: "And the Mueller Report violated all the Prosecutory rules by "not exonerating" the subject of the investigation. Prosecutors do not have the authority to exonerate."

Snoder said:

That is exactly what happened with Trump with the Mueller report. It was a litany of wrong doing. "

Click to expand...

Maybe you didn't hear, but after two years and over thirty million wasted dollars, all those Democrat lawyers found NO wrongdoing on the part of the President.

Snoder said:

Yes. Did you?



It discussed evidence of numerous crimes.

Click to expand...

yes, I read it. And the only crimes it even implied in connection with either the Trump Campaign or the Trump Administration were were allegations of possible obstruction. And for obstruction to be criminal, there has to be an underlying crime. And the report admitted that the investigators had found zero evidence of an underlying crime.

Biblewriter said:

yes, I read it. And the only crimes it even implied in connection with either the Trump Campaign or the Trump Administration were were allegations of possible obstruction. And for obstruction to be criminal, there has to be an underlying crime. And the report admitted that the investigators had found zero evidence of an underlying crime.

Click to expand...

Obstruction does not require an underlying crime in order to be illegal itself.

Arcangl86 said:

Obstruction does not require an underlying crime in order to be illegal itself.

Click to expand...

That is incorrect.

Biblewriter said:

That is incorrect.

Click to expand...

Show me the relevant law then.