- May 19, 2018
- 10,992
- 11,741
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Single
Revelation is so so so so misunderstood. Thousands of end times experts believe only they know the truth.
Upvote
0
Hi swan,
You responded:
I'm not sure that's the correct understanding of the first seal. There is no part of the description of the rider on the white horse as being the Antichrist unless one 'assumes' that. The rider is described as being released to conquer and is described similarly to other descriptions found within the Scriptures that are absolutely about Jesus.
That he rides out on a white horse. In Revelation 19 we read: I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and wages war. In this passage it is obviously Jesus who is sitting upon that white horse. Could it be the same white horse?
Then we read that he is given a crown and that he held a bow and was bent on conquest. Jesus also came bent on conquest. He came to us with a message from his Father that was intended to conquer the hearts of wicked mankind. He also wears a crown. In Revelation 14 we read: I looked, and there before me was a white cloud, and seated on the cloud was one like a son of man with a crown of gold on his head and a sharp sickle in his hand. Here, the one wearing the crown is described just as Jesus was often described in other visions, 'one looking like the son of man'.
So, it is possible, if one throws out any preconceptions of the passage, that this is referring to Jesus when he visited us and gave his life for our salvation and then released the gospel unto his servants, the apostles, to go out and conquer the hearts of men. For that is exactly what the gospel does when it is heard by a seeking heart. It conquers sin and death in that person's life and makes them subservient to our God.
That this passage refers to the Antichrist, cannot actually be proven by any words within the passage itself, if one understands that the gospel was also sent out to conquer. To give victory over sin and death among those who are already dead in their sin and trespasses. To give victory through Jesus and his testimony.
Just a point to be considered.
God bless,
In Christ, ted
The Anti-Christ HAS TO Conquer Israel to BECOME the Beast before the Mark of the Beast can be handed out, he is only the BEAST for 42 Months. It's pretty basic stuff, but people get way out over their skis on these things. People just need to SLOW DOWN and think rationally.
Every BEAST was over The whole or most of the Mediterranean Sea Region and ALWAYS Israel, without Israel there can be nothing to BEAST OVER in juxtaposition to God's plans !!
When Jerusalem is Conquered {see Daniel 12:5-7} we then have 1260 days left until the end of all these wonders {Second Coming}, thus the Beast rules for 42 Months.
I know what you're saying and I used to think that too, but you're only assuming that I am not being led by the Holy Spirit in this - which is what I stated in my post. If you think that I am not being led by the Holy Spirit, you need to test the spirit. Like you said as well, "I think this is not correct..." You don't know for sure.
I have asked God this very thing because I do not want to be led astray along with the many that will be according to the Bible. Yet, there will be many that will be killed for His name. My point is not to take a small line someone says and say "I think" rather than allowing God to tell you what the truth is. God will not hide the truth from someone seeking Him, but reveal in given season.
I both agree and disagree with points in your reply.
Trust God even over oneself.
That is what THAT VERSE MEANS, but 2 Thessalonians meas the departure of the Church, you do understand the difference between the two sentences in English right ?Hebrews6
You are missing the WHOLE POINT of the letter to the Thessalonians {the 2 Thess. 2 portion}. They must have wrote their own letter, we can surmise that, to Paul speaking about the Day of the Lord God's Wrath being UPON THEM !! Thus Paul writes, and says HEY BROTHERS, as per the Second Coming of Jesus, where we will b gathered unto him, please do not FEAR or have any ANGST, no matter what kind of messages you have been told {as if it was by us..Meaning it was not of them but was a false doctrinal letter from a FAKER}alleging/stating that the DAY OF THE LORD HAS COME [UPON THE WORLD].You are making a case for a mandatory pre-70th week rapture to happen before the Day of the Lord takes place.
But the Day of the Lord does not take place until sometime in the middle of the 70th week when the person goes into the temple sits and claims to be God.
So why is it mandatory that the rapture take place before the confirming of the covenant for 7 years?
The rapture may happen today, but is not mandatory to take place except to be before the Day of the Lord begins.
It is what it is, if you don't know when the Rapture is that is on you brother.For you to make a case of a mandatory pre-70th week rapture - you have to find something in the bible, that the rapture takes place before the confirming of the covenant for 7 years.
There are only two places I know of in the bible that refers to the confirming of the covenant for 7 years; 7 years actually being in the text.
(1) Daniel 9:27 (2) Deuteronomy 31:9-13
I agree.
Where we may disagree is that I believe in both a Pre-Trib Rapture, and Mid Trib Gathering up by Angels. I used to recently believe that the day of wrath as beginning at the 6th seal (because the inhabitants of the Earth have said that the great day of His wrath has come), but I noticed that God does not really pour out any major judgment until the 1st trumpet judgment. In fact, one angel had to tell four other angels not to harm the Earth yet at the breaking of the 6th seal so that the 144,000 (Messianic Jews) could be sealed and protected during this time. So I see the start of God's Wrath officially beginning with the 1st trumpet Judgment.
I say this because believers who were not martyred by the Antichrist with his enforcement of the mark (4th seal, i.e. death) are told to look up for their redemption draws near. This fits with the Olivet Discourse in Mark 13 that says that Christ is coming. Yet, this coming would be for the rest of His faithful elect ones and not for the wicked because there are still many other trumpet and bowl judgments that need to happen after the midpoint of the Tribulation. For the Olivet Discourse sounds more like a Mid Tribulation event.
How can it be on me when you are the one claiming the rapture must take place before the confirmation of the covenant for 7 years?It is what it is, if you don't know when the Rapture is that is on you brother.
What reveals him as the man of sin in the text is that he goes into the temple, sits, and claims to be God.And then the Man of Sin must also come before the DOTL comes upon the world. {Church Departs........then the Anti-Christ Conquers Jerusalem, which is when he DOTL starts, at the 1260 mark.}
Yes, Jesus repeats "in swiftness" twice in Revelation.You are on the right track, but think about it, where does the Trumpet Judgments come from ? The 7th Seal............So in staccato like speed, they are opened Boom, boom, boom, BOOM, BOOM, BOOM........
So the first 6 Seals I see as being opened all at the SAME TIME basically !! Boom, boom boom.
Think about the Seals Boom, boom, boom, boom, BOOM, BOOM............Boom.
It is described here in Revelation. Yet, this following text has not happened!
“And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.” (Revelation 13:15-18).
When John wrote Revelation, do you know what symbols he penned on the scroll that we interpreted as "666"?
if time statements mean what they say, then "soon" meant "soon" to the original 1st century AD readers...Chapter 20, the "thousand" years. Symbolic number representing a long time.
Very symbolic book. No need to assume a halt to such in ch. 20.
Same kind of symbolic language found in Old Testament for past fulfilled prophecies.
Revelation begins by saying they are things that must take place "soon". In other words, the main thrust of the book regards things in the near future for those in the 7 churches it is addressed to.
The theme has much to do with Jesus' coming judgment on unbelieving Israel primarily (and Rome), which He warned much about earlier in the gospels, along with what believers have to look forward to in heaven, giving hope for those who were enduring persecution, and all who thereafter do as well.
Well, "soon" I think is a little different than saying an exact number.if time statements mean what they say, then "soon" meant "soon" to the original 1st century AD readers...
and "thousand years" meant more or less "1000.000 years" beginning at some time in the future of the 1st century AD readers, upon the spiritual defeat of the Beast = pagan Roman empire (= Constantine, 4th century AD)
if time statements mean what they say, then "soon" meant "soon" to the original 1st century AD readers...
and "thousand years" meant more or less "1000.000 years" beginning at some time in the future of the 1st century AD readers, upon the spiritual defeat of the Beast = pagan Roman empire (= Constantine, 4th century AD)
Good points to think on.Rome was not spiritually defeated in the first century. According to John a King/Kingdom was yet to com,e and that one would be the one found in Rev 13:1 so that beast wasn't Rome plus John said it would only last a short time which further removes Rome from any possibility.
Rome persecuted the Jews in the first century. In Rev, the beast persecutes Christians not Jews.
Good points to think on.
As for Roman persecution, they persecuted both Jews and Christians.
But in Revelation I think the focus is on the Church's experience in light of being persecuted by Rome and the harlot that rides it, apostate Israel, which the beast turned against and burned.
Rome's eventual fall I think is in view too. In God's sovereign plan it fell apart and Christianity grew.
Eventually but Christians were too small in the earlier years but the Romans had rebellions from the Jews to deal with.
There is nothing about Rome or Roman's in Rev at all. Christians are persecuted in the book but by a kingdom and leadership that has yet to rise to power.
The beasts in Rev are destroyed by Christ at the second coming so Rome is not what is being described.
I may not ascribe to everything this writer views on eschatology, but what he says about this topic is useful. Also, consider the 4th kingdom of Daniel 2 being ancient Rome. I think it all fits very well.
The article gives an explanation for this. Beasts can refer to kingdoms or their rulers.Again, the last beast-kingdom is destroyed at the second coming. The second coming did not happen yet and so it certainly did not cause Rome to fall.
It says "in the days of those kingdoms". None of them exist anymore. The risen Christ now reigns from heaven and has been building his Church since.
Rev 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
"and one is" is a reference to Rome at the time John wrote this. The last kingdom is said not to have come yet so it's obviously impossible for the last kingdom to be Rome. Plus, when the last one comes, it doesn't even last long.