JohnAshton
Well-Known Member
- Aug 13, 2019
- 2,197
- 1,580
- 88
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
That apparently is going to be for the courts to decide.
IMO, yes.
IMO, yes.
Upvote
0
Just plain ridiculous.
Who makes this stuff up?
And who would really believe it?
TRUMP BIG SUPPORTER
OF OUR ARMED SERVICES.
Everybody knows that.
Hope this plays right up till 2020.
M-Bob
I thought similarly.When I first saw the headline I couldn't help but wonder if this was Trump trying to retroactively deprive John McCain of citizenship.
Sounds like another case of racism. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.
Of course, if your child is born on a military installation as my firstborn was (as children of military members usually are), in Germany, none of this applies. It seems unlikely that an executive order (apart from martial law) will be able to up-end the Constitution, itself, ultimately.
It is so petty, but then pettiness defines the tough on immigration crowd.Here's an article written after the "clarification." The change does, in fact, affect some children born to US citizens, indeed exactly the ones my previous posting suggested. If you become a US citizen and join the military immediately, you are at risk. In addition to being a citizen, parents have to have resided in the US for some period of time. The Trump administration's new citizenship policy will only affect 25 military children a year, officials say
You need to read the clarification carefully. The new policy does not affect children of parents who were *born* as US citizens. It targets only naturalized citizens. Traditionally I always thought of naturalized citizens as full citizens with the same rights as others. That turns out not to be the case. It will be interesting to see whether the Supreme Court considers it constitutional to make that kind of distinction.
Here's an article written after the "clarification." The change does, in fact, affect some children born to US citizens, indeed exactly the ones my previous posting suggested. If you become a US citizen and join the military immediately, you are at risk. In addition to being a citizen, parents have to have resided in the US for some period of time. The Trump administration's new citizenship policy will only affect 25 military children a year, officials say
You need to read the clarification carefully. The new policy does not affect children of parents who were *born* as US citizens. It targets only naturalized citizens. Traditionally I always thought of naturalized citizens as full citizens with the same rights as others. That turns out not to be the case. It will be interesting to see whether the Supreme Court considers it constitutional to make that kind of distinction.
Inasmuch as both of my children were born while I was assigned overseas with my wife, this comes as a shock to me.
All citizens are equal, but some are more equal than others…
So why do it at all? I'd've thought serving the US by putting one's life on the line would be worth something.Immigration officials say new policy will only affect about two dozen military families per year
Military Times article on the matter, and this one has a graphic noting who is and isn't affected.
Nutshell: this only affects children born overseas to parents who were not themselves US citizens at the time of birth or specific naturalized citizens who had not yet met certain residency requirements.
They're estimating that perhaps 25 families will be affected.
Honestly, why? What might have led you to expect a well thought out and nuanced response to a complex problem from the current White House leadership?
So why do it at all? I'd've thought serving the US by putting one's life on the line would be worth something.