Why are animal sacrifices done in the Millennial Temple

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
It says "the Levites" are in on this. And the Levitical priesthood has ended. Jesus is our High Priest. So, clearly this can not be a New Testament thing . . . I would say.
However > it does say there will be a time when Jesus Christ's people will rule the nations with a rod of iron. So, this would mean there will be people under us; we ourselves will not be ruled by the rod of iron.
So . . . may be . . . for all I know . . . we will have Levitical people under our rod of iron. But we would not be making the sacrifices, in such a case.
Indeed.......Excellent
Have you and/or others gandered at my thread on the Covnenantle parable of the Rich Man[Judah/OC High Priest and Lazarus[NC Gentiles/Lost sheep of Israel]
It is a very lenghthy study so those that are interested in it should subscribe and/or post on it.
Thanks

Luke 16 "Rich Man/Poor Man" parable.....The most misunderstood/misinterpreted Parable in the NT?

Next we look at where "purple" is used in the Bible:
Luke 16:
19 Yet a certain Man<444> was rich and was clothed in purple and fine-linen, making-merry down to a-day shiningly.

Now we will look into the color "purple" as used in the OT and NT

Lazarus and the Rich Man - Here a little, there a little - Commentary

We begin by scrutinizing the description Yeshua gives us of the rich man. First, he tells us that this man was clothed in purple and fine linen. This type of clothing would not have been out of the ordinary for one of considerable wealth during this time period. However, this attire also has symbolic meaning.
The Eerdmans Bible Dictionary says: "The wearing of purple was associated particularly with royalty . . ." (p. 863, "Purple"). In addition, the New Bible Dictionary tells us: "The use of linen in OT times was prescribed for priests (Ex. 28:39). The coat, turban and girdle must be of fine linen." (p. 702, "Linen").

So we see that the garments worn by this rich man were symbolic of royalty and the priesthood. With that in mind, let's see what God told Moses just before giving the Israelites the Law on Mount Sinai:
EXODUS 19:6 And ye shall be to me a royal priesthood and a holy nation: these words shalt thou speak to the children of Israel. (Brenton's LXX)
=================================
Genesis 1:1 (NKJV)

NKJV)
Exo 39:1
Of the blue, purple, and scarlet thread they made garments of ministry,[fn] for ministering in the holy place, and made the holy garments for Aaron, as the LORD had commanded Moses.

Used only in only 8 verses of the Prophets of Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Daniel

Jer 10:9
Silver is beaten into plates; It is brought from Tarshish,
And gold from Uphaz, The work of the craftsman And of the hands of the metalsmith;
Blue and purple are their clothing; They are all the work of skillful men.

Eze 23:6
Who were clothed in purple, Captains and rulers,
All of them desirable young men, Horsemen riding on horses.
Eze 27:7
Fine embroidered linen from Egypt was what you spread for your sail;
Blue and purple from the coasts of Elishah was what covered you.
Eze 27:16
“Syria was your merchant because of the abundance of goods you made.
They gave you for your wares emeralds, purple, embroidery, fine linen, corals, and rubies.
Eze 27:24
“These were your merchants in choice items—in purple clothes, in embroidered garments, in chests of multicolored apparel, in sturdy woven cords, which were in your marketplace.

Dan 5:7
The king cried aloud to bring in the astrologers, the Chaldeans, and the soothsayers. The king spoke, saying to the wise men of Babylon, “Whoever reads this writing, and tells me its interpretation, shall be clothed with purple and have a chain of gold around his neck; and he shall be the third ruler in the kingdom.”
Dan 5:29
Then Belshazzar gave the command, and they clothed Daniel with purple and put a chain of gold around his neck, and made a proclamation concerning him that he should be the third ruler in the kingdom.
=========================================
NT

Used in 8 verses, 4 of those concerning the Lord Jesus at His Crucifixion.
This is beginning to look like the Rich Man is a type of false "Christ/OC Priest/King/Joshua"

Mar 15:17
And they clothed Him with purple; and they twisted a crown of thorns, put it on His head,
Mar 15:20
And when they had mocked Him, they took the purple off Him, put His own clothes on Him, and led Him out to crucify Him.
Luk 16:19
“There was a certain rich man who was clothed in purple and fine linen and fared sumptuously every day.
Jhn 19:2
And the soldiers twisted a crown of thorns and put it on His head, and they put on Him a purple robe.
Jhn 19:5
Then Jesus came out, wearing the crown of thorns and the purple robe. And Pilate said to them, “Behold the Man!”

Jesus was a High Priest according after the order of Melchizedek and was condemned by the corrupt Jewish High Priests and religious rulers.

A good study on Him:

http://www.kingdombiblestudies.org/priest/RP24.htm

One of the most intriguing descriptions of the unique character of the High Priesthood of Jesus is found in Heb. 7:17 wherein it is stated, "Thou art a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek." This one grand statement shows that Jesus is not like any of the other priests who the people of Israel knew so much about. The entire seventh chapter of Hebrews is about THE MELCHIZEDEK CONNECTION,
===============
1 verse in Acts

Acts 16:14

Now a certain woman named Lydia heard us. She was a seller of purple from the city of Thyatira, who worshiped God. The Lord opened her heart to heed the things spoken by Paul.

The Destruction of Jerusalem - George Peter Holford, 1805AD

History records few events more generally interesting than the destruction of Jerusalem, and the subversion of the Jewish state, by the arms of the Romans. --
Their intimate connexion with the dissolution of the Levitical economy, and the establishment of Christianity in the world ; the striking verification which they afford of so many of the prophecies, both of the Old and New Testament, and the powerful arguments of the divine authority of the Scriptures which are thence derived
 
Upvote 0

Shrewd Manager

Through him, in all things, more than conquerors.
Site Supporter
Aug 16, 2019
4,167
4,081
Melbourne
✟364,409.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Why did Paul do that?

Good question. I think the best interpretation is that Paul headed back to Jerusalem with a head of steam to try to convert his beloved Jewish brethren, and despite God warning him in all manner of ways not to go (eg Agabus' warning), his zeal to convert the Jews got the better of him (see Romans 9:3).

So when he gets there, the Jews kick up a stink saying to the effect 'This is the guy who teaches lawlessness to gentiles', and so James and the brothers broker a deal whereby Paul gets to show that he respects the law and temple traditions etc by partaking in this Nazirite vow.

Now I suspect that the end of the vow would be a case of overkill in the Pharisee tradition, so they'd offer up more than a couple of sparrows. In any case, can you imagine the result if he had gone through with ANY sacrifice? So God intervenes and has him arrested before the 7 day ceremony can finish. Whew!

Still, the error of zeal cost Paul his travelling ministry, and bought him a one-way ticket to the big smoke. Where God still used him mightily, but he would have reflected on his actions there.

Answer your question?
 
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
9,641
7,851
63
Martinez
✟903,264.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Scripture tells us that the Millennial Temple will once again have animal sacrifices. Your thoughts
Actually scripture does not tell us this. A man made doctrine does. You can choose to question why, why or you can do more research and learn about the other view. Amillennialism. But in short, the rebuilding of the temple, including millions of dollars being fed to the cause by followers, is fueled by Dispensational teachings. The VERY SAD part about this teaching is during the "so called" millennial era, the temple must be erected so that the anti Christ can come in, claim that he is god, deceive a portion of the Jewish people into believing in him so that they get the mark of the beast and perish with him along with the rest who have not been raptured in secret. Animal sacrifice is a moot point. Pretty bad theology by John Nelson Darby, the creator of this theological system.
Anyway, my apologies to all who follow this train of thought, but all the truth must come out.
Blessings
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It says "the Levites" are in on this. And the Levitical priesthood has ended.
Are you sure on that? Writing of the very end times, Isaiah quotes God as saying this about gentiles:

Isa 66:21 I will also take some of them for priests and for Levites,” says the Lord.

the very next verse is talking about the New Heaven and the New Earth.

If the Levites are no longer functioning, why does God institute more of them?
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Now I suspect that the end of the vow would be a case of overkill in the Pharisee tradition, so they'd offer up more than a couple of sparrows. In any case, can you imagine the result if he had gone through with ANY sacrifice? So God intervenes and has him arrested before the 7 day ceremony can finish. Whew!
Actually he was arrested after the sacrifices were complete.

And Paul already had a vow that needed to be finished with sacrifices from way before he went to Jerusalem.

Your analysis does not work.
 
Upvote 0

Shrewd Manager

Through him, in all things, more than conquerors.
Site Supporter
Aug 16, 2019
4,167
4,081
Melbourne
✟364,409.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Actually he was arrested after the sacrifices were complete.

And Paul already had a vow that needed to be finished with sacrifices from way before he went to Jerusalem.

Your analysis does not work.
When the seven days were nearly over, some Jews from the province of Asia saw Paul at the temple. They stirred up the whole crowd and seized him (Acts 21:27)

Think again, my man.
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
When the seven days were nearly over, some Jews from the province of Asia saw Paul at the temple. They stirred up the whole crowd and seized him (Acts 21:27)

Think again, my man.
Num 6:13 ‘Now this is the law of the Nazirite when the days of his separation are fulfilled, he shall bring the offering to the doorway of the tent of meeting. 14 He shall present his offering to the Lord: one male lamb a year old without defect for a burnt offering and one ewe-lamb a year old without defect for a sin offering and one ram without defect for a peace offering, 15 and a basket of unleavened cakes of fine flour mixed with oil and unleavened wafers spread with oil, along with their grain offering and their drink offering. 16 Then the priest shall present them before the Lord and shall offer his sin offering and his burnt offering. 17 He shall also offer the ram for a sacrifice of peace offerings to the Lord, together with the basket of unleavened cakes; the priest shall likewise offer its grain offering and its drink offering. 18 The Nazirite shall then shave his dedicated head of hair at the doorway of the tent of meeting, and take the dedicated hair of his head and put it on the fire which is under the sacrifice of peace offerings. 19 The priest shall take the ram’s shoulder when it has been boiled, and one unleavened cake out of the basket and one unleavened wafer, and shall put them on the hands of the Nazirite after he has shaved his dedicated hair. 20 Then the priest shall wave them for a wave offering before the Lord. It is holy for the priest, together with the breast offered by waving and the thigh offered by lifting up; and afterward the Nazirite may drink wine.’

The sacrifices happen at the BEGINNING of the 7 days.
 
Upvote 0

~Zao~

Wisdom’s child
Site Supporter
Jun 27, 2007
3,060
957
✟100,595.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Good question. I think the best interpretation is that Paul headed back to Jerusalem with a head of steam to try to convert his beloved Jewish brethren, and despite God warning him in all manner of ways not to go (eg Agabus' warning), his zeal to convert the Jews got the better of him (see Romans 9:3).

So when he gets there, the Jews kick up a stink saying to the effect 'This is the guy who teaches lawlessness to gentiles', and so James and the brothers broker a deal whereby Paul gets to show that he respects the law and temple traditions etc by partaking in this Nazirite vow.

Now I suspect that the end of the vow would be a case of overkill in the Pharisee tradition, so they'd offer up more than a couple of sparrows. In any case, can you imagine the result if he had gone through with ANY sacrifice? So God intervenes and has him arrested before the 7 day ceremony can finish. Whew!

Still, the error of zeal cost Paul his travelling ministry, and bought him a one-way ticket to the big smoke. Where God still used him mightily, but he would have reflected on his actions there.

Answer your question?
Better answer. Also includes the original position of women in ministry via Numbers 6:2 and silence of the known prophetess at the time, which would have been the original message imo.
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Because he didn’t listen to the Holy Spirit direction and got himself into a mess o’ trouble.
No - Paul was listening to the Spirit and did EXACTLY as he was supposed to.

If that does not fit your theology, I suggest your theology is in error, not Paul.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
9,641
7,851
63
Martinez
✟903,264.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ez. 43- 46 seems to make this pretty clear.
God gave this vision to Ezekiel as a reminder to Israel what might have been if they remained in Him.
Did they remain obedient? No. This is only a description of a temple to the house of Israel in order to shame them into repentance. They did not repent. This was never built and will never be built. The temple is now within each and every person in the Body of Christ.
“Son of man, describe the temple to the house of Israel, that they may be ashamed of their iniquities; and let them measure the pattern. And if they are ashamed of all that they have done, make known to them the design of the temple” (Ezek. 43:10–11).
 
Upvote 0

~Zao~

Wisdom’s child
Site Supporter
Jun 27, 2007
3,060
957
✟100,595.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No - Paul was listening to the Spirit and did EXACTLY as he was supposed to.

If that does not fit your theology, I suggest your theology is in error, not Paul.
Then why was the HS telling him all the way along to Jerusalem not to go. Why? because it doesn’t fit your tight little box of what the HS can and cannot do.
 
Upvote 0

Shrewd Manager

Through him, in all things, more than conquerors.
Site Supporter
Aug 16, 2019
4,167
4,081
Melbourne
✟364,409.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Num 6:13 ‘Now this is the law of the Nazirite when the days of his separation are fulfilled, he shall bring the offering to the doorway of the tent of meeting. 14 He shall present his offering to the Lord: one male lamb a year old without defect for a burnt offering and one ewe-lamb a year old without defect for a sin offering and one ram without defect for a peace offering, 15 and a basket of unleavened cakes of fine flour mixed with oil and unleavened wafers spread with oil, along with their grain offering and their drink offering. 16 Then the priest shall present them before the Lord and shall offer his sin offering and his burnt offering. 17 He shall also offer the ram for a sacrifice of peace offerings to the Lord, together with the basket of unleavened cakes; the priest shall likewise offer its grain offering and its drink offering. 18 The Nazirite shall then shave his dedicated head of hair at the doorway of the tent of meeting, and take the dedicated hair of his head and put it on the fire which is under the sacrifice of peace offerings. 19 The priest shall take the ram’s shoulder when it has been boiled, and one unleavened cake out of the basket and one unleavened wafer, and shall put them on the hands of the Nazirite after he has shaved his dedicated hair. 20 Then the priest shall wave them for a wave offering before the Lord. It is holy for the priest, together with the breast offered by waving and the thigh offered by lifting up; and afterward the Nazirite may drink wine.’

The sacrifices happen at the BEGINNING of the 7 days.

You're persistent, but not up with the new procedures:

The next day Paul took the men and purified himself along with them. Then he went to the temple to give notice of the date when the days of purification would end and the offering would be made for each of them.

That's the preceding verse to the above: Acts 21:26. So it was due to happen at the end, and just before the end, he was arrested.
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Then why was the HS telling him all the way along to Jerusalem not to go. Why? because it doesn’t fit your tight little box of what the HS can and cannot do.
It was the Holy Spirit telling him to go on. It was the people around him telling him not to go. God wanted him arrested and taken before the Roman authorities including Nero.
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You're persistent, but not up with the new procedures:

The next day Paul took the men and purified himself along with them. Then he went to the temple to give notice of the date when the days of purification would end and the offering would be made for each of them.

That's the preceding verse to the above: Acts 21:26. So it was due to happen at the end, and just before the end, he was arrested.
Did you read the Num 6 passage? There was a different offering at the end. The initial offerings were on day 1. That had to precede the cutting of the hair. the final offerings including the burning of the hair happened at the end of the time.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

~Zao~

Wisdom’s child
Site Supporter
Jun 27, 2007
3,060
957
✟100,595.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It was the Holy Spirit telling him to go on. It was the people around him telling him not to go. God wanted him arrested and taken before the Roman authorities including Nero.
Acts of the Apostles 21:1-6 "And having sought out the disciples, we stayed there for seven days. Through the Spirit they told Paul not to go on to Jerusalem.”

Anyway there is no denying that Paul made a mistake but in doing so he exhibited that the Nazarite Way is and always has been, open to both sexes. Numbers 6:2
 
Upvote 0

Shrewd Manager

Through him, in all things, more than conquerors.
Site Supporter
Aug 16, 2019
4,167
4,081
Melbourne
✟364,409.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Did you read the Num 6 passage? There was a different offering at the end. The initial offerings were on day 1. That had to precede the cutting of the hair. the final offerings including the burning of the hair happened at the end of the time.

Yes Dave, thanks for the reference, I hadn't compared them closely. It seems there was a procedural difference in Paul's case. We might speculate as to why this occurred, whether it was a customary variation by the oral tradition and so on. Nevertheless, there it is.
 
Upvote 0

Shrewd Manager

Through him, in all things, more than conquerors.
Site Supporter
Aug 16, 2019
4,167
4,081
Melbourne
✟364,409.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Acts of the Apostles 21:1-6 "And having sought out the disciples, we stayed there for seven days. Through the Spirit they told Paul not to go on to Jerusalem.”

Anyway there is no denying that Paul made a mistake but in doing so he exhibited that the Nazarite Way is and always has been, open to both sexes. Numbers 6:2

There may be a type in Saul's errors of sacrifice and impatience in 1 Samuel 13-15. So Paul became Saul (again)! Possibly?

Nobody can do the Nazirite vow like Sampson though!
 
Upvote 0

Charlie24

Newbie
Oct 17, 2014
2,306
963
✟103,731.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Please consider the spiritual nature of the Kingdom:

“And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” (Matthew 3:2) (KJV 1900)

“And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.” (Matthew 11:12) (KJV 1900)

“Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.” (Matthew 16:28) (KJV 1900)

“Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.” (1 Corinthians 15:50)

“Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” (John 3:3) (KJV 1900)

“Jesus answered, “I tell you the solemn truth, unless a person is born of water and spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.” (John 3:5)

“Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.” (John 18:36) (KJV 1900)

“And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:” (Luke 17:20) (KJV 1900)

“Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.” (Luke 17:21) (KJV 1900)

“But if I cast out demons by the finger of God, then the kingdom of God has already overtaken you.” (Luke 11:20)

“because we are not looking at what can be seen but at what cannot be seen. For what can be seen is temporary, but what cannot be seen is eternal.” (2 Corinthians 4:18)

“Now when the people saw the miraculous sign that Jesus performed, they began to say to one another, “This is certainly the Prophet who is to come into the world.” Then Jesus, because he knew they were going to come and seize him by force to make him king, withdrew again up the mountainside alone.” (John 6:14–15)

“He delivered us from the power of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of the Son he loves,” (Colossians 1:13)

When Jesus saw that he answered intelligently, He said to him, “You are not far from the kingdom of God.” And no one dared to question Him any longer.” (Mark 12:34) (HCSB)

“for the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit.” (Romans 14:17) (HCSB)

“I, John, your brother and fellow partaker in the tribulation and kingdom and perseverance which are in Jesus, was on the island called Patmos because of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus.” Revelation 1:9 (NASB95)

Dave, you have taken these scriptures completely out of context.

Jesus did say that His kingdom is not of this world, John 18:36. But in the same verse He said that "NOW is not my kingdom of this world."

In Luke 1:31-33, God gives Jesus the throne of David. This is a literal throne, as Davids throne was literal. There is no reason to believe this is a spiritual kingdom.

There is no reason to believe the 1000 years in Rev. is not literal.

Jesus came the first time to the Jews only, preaching "Behold, the kingdom of heaven is at hand." He was offering Israel the kingdom of heaven here on earth NOW. Of course, they rejected Him because He wasn't the Messiah they were looking for.

They were looking for the Messiah warrior to overthrow Rome. He will return the second time as that Warrior to save Israel. Then the literal 1000 year reign will begin.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,876
USA
✟580,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Dave, you have taken these scriptures completely out of context.

Jesus did say that His kingdom is not of this world, John 18:36. But in the same verse He said that "NOW is not my kingdom of this world."

In Luke 1:31-33, God gives Jesus the throne of David. This is a literal throne, as Davids throne was literal. There is no reason to believe this is a spiritual kingdom.

There is no reason to believe the 1000 years in Rev. is not literal.

Jesus came the first time to the Jews only, preaching "Behold, the kingdom of heaven is at hand." He was offering Israel the kingdom of heaven here on earth NOW. Of course, they rejected Him because He wasn't the Messiah they were looking for.

They were looking for the Messiah warrior to overthrow Rome. He will return the second time as that Warrior to save Israel. Then the literal 1000 year reign will begin.
Just read the scripture and don't settle on anything without checking other translations too. Dispensationalism does not come from scripture. It is a theory based on what would happen IF there were a gap of thousands of years between Daniel's 69th and 70th weeks. From there they cut scripture from its context and paint in what they want it to say, rather than going by what it actually says.
 
Upvote 0