- Jul 30, 2019
- 279
- 105
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
why do USA politicians love environmental protection so much now? because
Last edited:
I hadn't noticed that they did.why do USA politicians love environmental protection so much?
Sadly.I hadn't noticed that they did.
IMO it's just the next big idea that those currently in power believe would motivate more spending among us peons, to jolt the economy back to a semblance of life for the short-term (at the expense of the long-term).why doUSApoliticians love environmental protection so much?
Do they? I haven’t noticed.why do USA politicians love environmental protection so much?
You don't have a long term without an environment.IMO it's just the next big idea that those currently in power believe would motivate more spending among us peons, to jolt the economy back to a semblance of life for the short-term (at the expense of the long-term).
You don't have a long term without an environment.
I agree with that. I'm just pointing out how I believe this is just another "new" subject hyped up to stimulate the short-term economy.
Climate change is a real concern. Though I always look at the solutions with the words ‘beware of unintended consequences’ in mind. Look at the mess in regard to recycling where millions of tonnes of materials that people think are going to be recycled instead go to landfill or are burnt.You don't have a short term without one either. We aren't actually seriously equating proposals politicians claim would be good for the environment or stop climate change with solutions that would actually be effective in alleviating real environmental concerns are we? I am not sure what OP is suggesting with the comment about USA politicians.
Any rhetoric on any subject is an opportunity for government to enforce new laws and rules, because that is the main tool & purpose of government. New regulations force economic activity because they are usually accompanied by new bureaucratic apparatuses, regulators, inspectors, fees, taxes, penalties, paid licenses, along with a reprioritizing of the peoples' economic activity.I don't follow the train of reasoning. How would environmental protection rhetoric stimulate a short term uptick in the economy?
Climate change is a real concern. Though I always look at the solutions with the words ‘beware of unintended consequences’ in mind. Look at the mess in regard to recycling where millions of tonnes of materials that people think are going to be recycled instead go to landfill or are burnt.
In regard to plastic waste there needs to be measures taken to reduce it, minimum prices for plastic bags has demonstrably worked.
Yes there are real concerns about the changing climate. I only point out that the solutions proposed from political circles do not actually deal with those concerns. They do not stop climate change or even slow it down nor are there many reasonable proposals for dealing with the consequences of a changing climate. . Mainly the proposed political solutions just redistribute wealth and power while watching the climate change. I am unaware of minimum prices for plastic bags doing anything much in reducing plastic waste. Perhaps you could provide the information I lack? Certainly the problem of plastic waste is one that could be solved fairly easily as it has only one cause , that being human wastefulness and therefore is controllable. Unlike climate change that most likely must be worked around rather than controlled due to the multiplicity of causes, many of which are completely out of our control.
Any rhetoric on any subject is an opportunity for government to enforce new laws and rules, because that is the main tool & purpose of government. New regulations force economic activity because they are usually accompanied by new bureaucratic apparatuses, regulators, inspectors, fees, taxes, penalties, paid licenses, along with a reprioritizing of the peoples' economic activity.
The government forces spending through taxation, especially on necessities, like food. This promotes short-term, short-sighted economic activity, especially if the People would rather save their money.Those things you mention slow economic growth so if one is looking for a short term stimulus of the economy one removes them not imposes them. Increasing the cost of a good or service will decrease the demand for it not increase it. Increasing taxes will decrease the amount of money citizens have to spend, slowing down, not speeding up economic activity. If one wishes to increase economic activity the best way to achieve that is through innovation in the private sector. Find products and services that people were unaware that they wanted or needed in the past and economic activity will boom.
If we really mess it up long term, the cost of remediation is going to be a lot more, both economically and politically.
Current politics isn't even beginning to address the problems, it's mostly window dressing.
I dont think half of the politicians care enough .why do USA politicians love environmental protection so much?