What’s your point?
Like I said hit or miss and extremely easy to manipulate, but believe in them if you want.uhmmm...I might point out the polls were accurate in predicting millions more people were going to not be voting for President Trump then voted for him, and they were right. It wasn't the polls that were wrong, what was wrong was predicting the poll results.
tulc(never gets tired of pointing that out)
...you mean like making sure only one particular race is allowed to rent one of your apartments? Or making sure other races aren't allowed to rent one?(snip)
"Racism" refers to the belief that one race is inherently superior or inferior to other races.
No, that would be smart business in not having almost of your rentals leave (with no one to replace them) because you changed the atmosphere of their community in a way they did not want it changed....you mean like making sure only one particular race is allowed to rent one of your apartments? Or making sure one races arn't allowed to rent one?
tulc(is just curious)
Oh!...so making an assumption about other people based solely on their race ("We only allow one particular race to rent our apartments.") isn't in fact racist?No, that would be smart business in not having almost of your rentals leave (with no one to replace them) because you changed the atmosphere of their community in a way they did not want it changed.
I guess I will never understand how they do these polls, and how they can claim what they do.
They said:
Responses are reported for 1,306 self-identified registered voters with a margin of
sampling error of +/- 3.4 percentage points.
So 1,306 people represent all of America? lol and all we need is 653 people to agree, and we know what 1/2 of Americans think - whatever they said they do?
This has gone on for 4 pages, and you all are debating over what 1306 people think? No offense, but they need a bigger number of individuals to truly claim anything if they want to say 'more than 1/2 of America' think anything. They estimated in 2018 that 327.2 million people live in the country.
No, that would be smart business in not having almost of your rentals leave (with no one to replace them) because you changed the atmosphere of their community in a way they did not want it changed.
He didn't rent the kind of apartments you or I could afford at maybe only a few thousand dollars a month. He rented expensive, high end places where the occupants were quite discriminatory about their neighbors. And unless you are a total fool, you listen to the people who are supporting you with their rent money.tulc said: ↑
...you mean like making sure only one particular race is allowed to rent one of your apartments? Or making sure one races arn't allowed to rent one?
tulc(is just curious)
The issue of moral corruption aside, this was New York City, not Birmingham, Alabama. Very unlikely, especially with the shortage of apartments in the city at that time. But it's true that Trump probably thought that way. In one meeting with the federal enforcement people, he said "you don't want to live near them, either." He actually believed most people were like that.
So ... you're talking about millionaires and billionaires, right ?Anyone can sit at a computer and claim all sorts of righteousness about how THEY would conduct business, but when the rubber meets the road, it is time to be honest. No one here would risk losing millions of dollars to try to act like THEY were morally superior to other landlords.
Like I said, "Honesty!" If you owned those apartments, would you tell people paying as much as $100K a month to "suck it up"....that you were going to rent to perhaps only two people in the whole county who could afford your rates, and leave the rest vacant when your present renters moved outThose type of high end places should no more be able to discriminate than any other place. Percy Julian had gasoline poured into his house while the family was sleeping. He and other family members sat up nights with a gun to prevent his family from being murdered The man was has an award named after him by the prestigious American Chemical Society . I think he could have done even better work if he hadn’t had his sleep interrupted by evil people who want to murder him because they just didn’t like living next to a black man . His skin color was more important to some ignoramuses than his intelligence.
They throw that R card out like it's nothing now days.
And it's a shame but,
most are hip to the game.
How many will be deceived in 2020?
Not enough so as to
mess up Trump's reelection.
He didn't rent the kind of apartments you or I could afford at maybe only a few thousand dollars a month. He rented expensive, high end places where the occupants were quite discriminatory about their neighbors.
And unless you are a total fool, you listen to the people who are supporting you with their rent money.
Anyone can sit at a computer and claim all sorts of righteousness about how THEY would conduct business,
but when the rubber meets the road, it is time to be honest. No one here would risk losing millions of dollars to try to act like THEY were morally superior to other landlords.
Trump wasn't making judgements about people.
He (just like US Home I worked for at the same time) was thinking about keeping his apartments rented. And to do that, he had to please the 99% of the people who already rented his kind of apartments.
So you're saying that it's OK to be racially discriminatory, even though it's against the law, as long as it will make more money for you? Am I understanding you correctly? Feel free to clarify.He didn't rent the kind of apartments you or I could afford at maybe only a few thousand dollars a month. He rented expensive, high end places where the occupants were quite discriminatory about their neighbors. And unless you are a total fool, you listen to the people who are supporting you with their rent money.
Anyone can sit at a computer and claim all sorts of righteousness about how THEY would conduct business, but when the rubber meets the road, it is time to be honest. No one here would risk losing millions of dollars to try to act like THEY were morally superior to other landlords.
Trump wasn't making judgements about people. He (just like US Home I worked for at the same time) was thinking about keeping his apartments rented. And to do that, he had to please the 99% of the people who already rented his kind of apartments.
Honesty. I'll be honest, I would not do what's morally wrong as well as illegal just to make a buck.
Are you saying you are OK with people doing that? Would you do that yourself?
I think this is the crux of it - I don't get it! I don't get how someone can purportedly be for certain morals and values but then say it's OK for someone ELSE to lack those morals and values in order to get things done for the sake of money. For me, the Bible says not to be a stumbling block to others and encourage them in their sin, not to mention that we shouldn't support others' sin.I suppose the point is, Trump will, and does.
My guess is that most Trump supporters tolerate him doing and saying things that they would never do or say themselves, and would be angered or disgusted if anyone else did or said them.
I don't get it, but that's how it seems to be.