Women's ultimate responsibility for world's sin

A_Thinker

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 23, 2004
11,911
9,064
Midwest
✟953,784.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In fact, the battle of the sexist did not start in the church of Corinth, nor in the 60s in America. The battle of the sexist started back in Eden.
It was part of the curse ...

Genesis 3:16 “You will desire to control your husband, but he will rule over you.”
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Willing-heart
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,381
Sydney, Australia.
✟244,844.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I realize this won't be a popular post, but I'm aiming for truth, here, not the feelings of comfort or the approval of other people, so come what may.

When we really get down to it, every sin problem in the world points back to Eve. She ate the fruit. Adam wasn't deceived, but Eve gave him the fruit. She chose to know what evil was, and so now we have evil in the world because of woman.

With this in mind, I cannot ever support feminism, despite being female. Whatever sin, rape, murder, etc. happens to woman, we brought it on ourselves through the actions of our original ancestor. It makes no logical sense to demand rights, love, etc. when all the problems of evil/sin in the world were brought on by us in the first place. WE are the ones who brought this mess on humanity, not Adam/men. Every sin you see -- that's ultimately all on Eve, the woman.
Where's Eve?

We need to get her and punish her severely; how could Eve do this to us all?
 
Upvote 0

AlexDTX

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2015
4,191
2,818
✟328,934.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The claim was: "Paul, at first, appears conflicted until we realize that the pastoral epistles (1 and 2 Timothy and Titus) were actually written pseudonymously some 60 years after Paul's death."

Modern analytical bible scholars have intensively studied the text of those epistles that are generally attributed to Paul. By closely examining vocabulary, grammar and thought themes they are in agreement that the following epistles are genuinely from Paul. They are 1 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, Philemon and Romans. Two more letters, Colossians and 2 Thessalonians are in dispute. Hebrews does not reflect Paul’s style and content whatsoever. Ephesians does not reflect the style of Paul but is very much Pauline in content and is thought to have been written by a close follower of Paul’s. The Pastoral letters (Titus, 1 Timothy and 2 Timothy) are attributed to Paul, but someone writing in Paul’s name wrote them around AD120, some 60 years after Paul’s death. Each letter uses vocabulary Paul is not known to have used; each has a different concept than Paul had of key matters such as faith; and each refers to Paul’s close friends Timothy and Titus in formal rather than friendly terms. They assume that Christian churches are governed by the kind of carefully organized authority structures that developed decades after Paul’s time. They are similar in style and in content and in the issues they raise. Scholars generally believe them to have been written by the same person. In addition two of Paul’s epistles are thought to be composed of what were originally several smaller letters. In particular Philippians is composed of three and 2 Corinthians is composed of six. Chapter 16 of Romans seems to be a later addition but genuinely by Paul.

John Dominic Crossan has provided a detailed classification of our sources for the historical Jesus according to the chronological stratification of the traditions. For a brief discussion of each source, including the reasons for its proposed dating, see John Dominic Crossan, The Historical Jesus (HarperCollins, 1991) Appendix 1, pp. 427-50. All dates shown are C.E. (Common Era).


First Stratum [30 to 60 C.E.]

1. First Letter of Paul to the Thessalonians (late 40s)

2. Letter of Paul to the Galatians (winter of 52/53)

3. First Letter of Paul to the Corinthians (winter of 53/54.)

4. Letter of Paul to the Romans (winter of 55/56)

5. Gospel of Thomas I (earliest layer of Thomas, composed in 50s)

6. Egerton Gospel (50s)

7. Papyrus Vienna G. 2325 (50s)

8. Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 1224 (50s)

9. Gospel of the Hebrews (Egypt, 50s)

10. Sayings Gospel Q (50s)

11. Miracles Collection (50s)

12. Apocalyptic Scenario (50s)

13. Cross Gospel (50s)


Second Stratum [60 to 80 C.E.]

14. Gospel of the Egyptians (60s)

15. Secret Gospel of Mark (early 70s)

16. Gospel of Mark (late 70s)

17. P. Oxyrhynchus 840 (?80s)

18. Gospel of Thomas II (later layers, 70s)

19. Dialogue Collection (70s)

20. Signs Gospel, or Book of Signs (70s)

21. Letter to the Colossians (70s)


Third Stratum [80 to 120 C.E.]

22. Gospel of Matthew (90)

23. Gospel of Luke (90s)

24. Revelation/Apocalypse of John (late 90s)

25. First Letter of Clement (late 90s)

26. Epistle of Barnabas (end first century)

27. Didache (other than 1:3b2:1, 16:35) (end first century)

28. Shepherd of Hermas (100)

29. Letter of James (100)

30. Gospel of John I (early second century)

31. Letter of Ignatius, To the Ephesians (110)

32. Letter of Ignatius, To the Magnesians (110)

33. Letter of Ignatius, To the Trallians (110)

34. Letter of Ignatius, To the Romans (110)

35. Letter of Ignatius, To the Philadelphians (110)

36. Letter of Ignatius, To the Smyrneans (110)

37. Letter of Ignatius, To Polycarp (110)

38. First Letter of Peter (112)

39. Letter of Polycarp, To the Philippians, 1314 (115)

40. First Letter of John (115)


Fourth Stratum [120 to 150 C.E.]

41. Gospel of John II (after 120)

42. Acts of the Apostles (after 120)

43. Apocryphon of James (before 150)

44. First Letter to Timothy (after 120)

45. Second Letter to Timothy (after 120)

46. Letter to Titus (after 120)

47. Second Letter of Peter (between 125 and 150)

48. Letter of Polycarp, To the Philippians, 112 (140)

49. Second Letter of Clement (150)

50. Gospel of the Nazoreans (middle second century)

51. Gospel of the Ebionites (middle second century)

52. Didache, 1:3b2:1 (middle second century)

53. Gospel of Peter (middle second century)

The issue of womens' role in the church is not as clear cut as some people would want to think. The letters of Paul, which date to the middle of the first century AD, provide some clues. For example, Paul greets Prisca, Junia, Julia, and Nereus' sister, who worked and traveled as missionaries in pairs with their husbands or brothers (Romans 16:3, 7, 15) as equals and co-workers. Junia is praised as a prominent apostle, imprisoned for her faith. Mary and Persis are commended for their hard work (Romans 16:6, 12). Euodia and Syntyche are called his fellow-workers in the gospel (Philippians 4:2-3). Women were the leaders of house churches (Apphia in Philemon 2; Prisca in I Corinthians 16:19), Lydia of Thyatira (Acts 16:15) and Nympha of Laodicea (Colossians 4:15). Women held offices and played significant roles in group worship, such as the deacon Phoebe (Romans 16:1) and women were certainly praying and prophesying during worship (I Corinthians 11). An order of widows served formal roles of ministry (I Timothy 5:9-10). Women prophets included Mary Magdalene, the Corinthian women, Philip's daughters, Ammia of Philadelphia, Philumene, the visionary martyr Perpetua, Maximilla, Priscilla (Prisca), and Quintilla.

Thank you. It was as I expected, an analysis of internal evidence. I am reading Zechariah, and the 19th century commentators I am reading along with them (Albert Barnes and Adam Clarke) say the last two chapters were not written by Zechariah for some of the same reasons you listed above.

These things may be so, but all is still conjecture on analysts parts. I don't trust analysts. And I am shy of making definitive statements as tho these things are facts, when they are not. They are still just men's opinions.

You were very gracious to provide such exhaustive references. I know that takes a while to type in. Thank you for responding to my request.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: Paidiske
Upvote 0

AlexDTX

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2015
4,191
2,818
✟328,934.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Do you really feel that men, in general, would be LESS aggressive and acquisitive ... if women weren't putting pressure on them.

Social studies seem to indicate that women are a civilizing influence upon men ...
Doesn't take social studies. Any married man who has a good marriage will attest to that.
 
Upvote 0

A_Thinker

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 23, 2004
11,911
9,064
Midwest
✟953,784.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
By looking at God's judgment in the aftermath (by actually reading the Bible) we discover that neither Adam or Eve were cursed. They were punished but not cursed. There were just two curses issued --- on the serpent and on the earth.
You are, indeed, more accurate in your reading ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟960,497.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
It was part of the curse ...

Genesis 3:16 “You will desire to control your husband, but he will rule over you.”
He will rule over you because of your desire to control your husband, or because of his desire to rule over you you will be led into a desire to control your husband, or...?

Wait a minute...? The chicken and the egg!, the chicken and the egg!

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟960,497.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
Doesn't take social studies. Any married man who has a good marriage will attest to that.
Define "good marriage"...?

And what if it all goes bad...?

We see what Adam submitting himself to his wife brought about...?

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

AlexDTX

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2015
4,191
2,818
✟328,934.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
By looking at God's judgment in the aftermath (by actually reading the Bible) we discover that neither Adam or Eve were cursed. They were punished but not cursed. There were just two curses issued --- on the serpent and on the earth.
Strictly my opinion that I will not argue for, but I think the word "curse" comes from hard hearts. What God pronounced the consequence of sin, which we view as a curse.
 
Upvote 0

~Zao~

Wisdom’s child
Site Supporter
Jun 27, 2007
3,060
957
✟100,595.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
He will rule over you because of your desire to control your husband, or because of his desire to rule over you you will be led into a desire to control your husband, or...?

Wait a minute...? The chicken and the egg!, the chicken and the egg!

God Bless!
Cain was told the same thing. Sin will have dominion over you
 
Upvote 0

AlexDTX

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2015
4,191
2,818
✟328,934.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Define "good marriage"...?

And what if it all goes bad...?

God Bless!
A good marriage is one where both parties recognize the strengths and weaknesses of each other for mutual benefit. I know my wife has been a "civilizing" influence on me.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I realize this won't be a popular post, but I'm aiming for truth, here, not the feelings of comfort or the approval of other people, so come what may.

When we really get down to it, every sin problem in the world points back to Eve. She ate the fruit. Adam wasn't deceived, but Eve gave him the fruit. She chose to know what evil was, and so now we have evil in the world because of woman.

With this in mind, I cannot ever support feminism, despite being female. Whatever sin, rape, murder, etc. happens to woman, we brought it on ourselves through the actions of our original ancestor. It makes no logical sense to demand rights, love, etc. when all the problems of evil/sin in the world were brought on by us in the first place. WE are the ones who brought this mess on humanity, not Adam/men. Every sin you see -- that's ultimately all on Eve, the woman.


The woman was deceived. The man knew what he was doing.

God placed the responsibility on the man, not the woman.

That is why Jesus could not have a human father, but could have a human mother. Her ovum does not pass down the sin nature.

Romans 15:12 tells us that sin entered the world through one man. Its been ever since the male's "seed" that passes on the sin nature in copulation. Not the woman's ovum. That is why we read in Genesis 3:15, that the messiah would be born of the woman's seed!

God saw Adam as the responsible party.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟960,497.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
A good marriage is one where both parties recognize the strengths and weaknesses of each other for mutual benefit. I know my wife has been a "civilizing" influence on me.
Very good, but who wears the pants...?

Does one with the right strength wear the pants, whether it is the male or the female...? And it does not matter, or what...? Is it just the particular strength that matters, or what...?
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟960,497.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
A good marriage is one where both parties recognize the strengths and weaknesses of each other for mutual benefit. I know my wife has been a "civilizing" influence on me.
Do you fear her...?
 
Upvote 0

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
20,797
17,901
USA
✟951,544.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Adam submitted to his wife... Happens all the time, he was weak and they are both to blame...

There is nothing wrong with loving your partner, serving her, and heeding godly counsel. It’s something else to surrender the reins and crown her king.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Greengardener

for love is of God
Site Supporter
May 24, 2019
633
597
MidAtlantic
✟175,913.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You write an interesting argument for rejecting feminism, kdm, but I think I have to side with most of the others in saying that there are better arguments for rejecting feminism, and more to the story in Scriptures that actually supports other arguments better.

One thing I ask myself often is "What is this particular passage in the Bible trying to tell me about the nature of God or the nature of mankind?" And I compare stories to see what I can glean there. Let's pick the story...say...the prophet who was traveling and God told him do NOT stop to eat but go there and come right back, but the local prophet there told the traveling prophet that God had told the local prophet to have the traveler eat with him. After the meal, the local prophet prophesied the death of the traveling prophet, one can assume it had something to do with disobeying, although the local prophet gave the traveling prophet honor in his death. You might remember that it seemed very evident that God had a hand in this plan because the lion that slew the traveling prophet was sitting there, along with the donkey, until someone came to get the traveling prophet. One would gather from comparing the stories that human nature has a clannish desire to allow someone else to lead, and in some cases, like when it's God, we would do well to obey in spite of anyone. Even Peter feel to this one when he would eat with the Gentiles until the people from James came down, then he withdrew because the Jews in general would not eat with others, and his hypocrisy almost led Barnabas astray. The tendency we have to fall away from God into the safety of humans hasn't stopped there. Jesus told us to not love anyone more than God, which is simply the first commandment stated another way. We'll probably never know what would have happened had Adam stood up and said NO, I refuse to disobey God. We do know that when Ninevah repented, so did God repent of His fierce judgement, although they later fell. Perhaps Adam's refusal then would have only postponed an act of rebellion later. We do see also that God didn't micromanage Adam and Eve, and He didn't keep the traveling prophet from the consequences of his disobedience. So I took the stories, came up with a reasonable intent, and now I can look to see what other scriptures support that idea or refute it. In most cases I'll learn something about the nature of God and the nature of man that will help me as I live today.

Of the many things I can learn from the Garden story, I don't find it helpful to think that if I am attacked, raped, and or murdered, that I should agree that since women brought sin into the world, it's just retribution. I believe, as scripture teaches, that whether I'm in the field or the city, if someone tries to perpetrate harm on me, I'm going to give strong effort to see that the court has a chance to deal out justice, since they are the arm of God to do that, at the same time praying that God will have mercy and give repentance to the perpetrator. And it wouldn't matter were I male or female, I would think it a sensible course to disable someone demonstrating their intentions to harm others. Just recently a young woman was shot dead a few miles from here, someone related to someone I know. At her funeral, one old man stood praying that people would forgive the murderer and not harbor hate in their hearts while the next man speaking said, yes, Lord, but we want Your justice on this murderer, that we forgive him but that YOU take him to justice and show mercy. It was one of those amazing moments where in my heart, I saw my prayer to be that this murderer would take on the life he took, by taking on the kindly actions the girl demonstrated during her life. What mercy and what justice it would be for him to trade his evil in true repentance and become a doer of the good she had been doing, living a righteous life from here on! And God clearly delights in showing kindness and mercy, along with justice: Jeremiah 9.24. If not, I feel sure he will forfeit what life he has, with no gain for having forced the loss of her life.

Like everyone here, we're all trying to make sense out of what we see in life and what we see in Scriptures, hopefully with the good help of the Comforter who reminds us of how Jesus fleshed out the words of God as He lived as the Word among us. Definitely none of us can claim entitlement by having been better than Adam and Eve, because if it hadn't been them, it would have been at least one of us, and I daresay, it would have been all of us. May we all see through the deceit by drawing ever closer to the Truth Himself.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: kdm1984
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The Bible tells us that...

The woman was deceived. The man knew what he was doing.

The Bible also tells us that God placed the responsibility for sin on the man, not the woman.

It is why Jesus could not have a human father. But, he could have a human mother. For the woman's ovum does not pass down the sin nature. Its the male's seed that does.

Romans 15:12 tells us that sin entered the world through one man. Its been ever since the male's "seed" that passes on the sin nature in copulation. Not the woman's ovum.

That is why we read in Genesis 3:15, that the Messiah would be born of the woman's seed!

God sees Adam as the responsible party.

The Holy Spirit had to provide the perfect male genetic material to fertilize the chosen ovum that came from Mary's body.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
Reactions: kdm1984
Upvote 0

kdm1984

WELS
Oct 8, 2016
309
366
SW MO, USA
✟38,896.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Bible tells us that...

The woman was deceived. The man knew what he was doing.

The Bible also tells us that God placed the responsibility for sin on the man, not the woman.

It is why Jesus could not have a human father. But, he could have a human mother. For the woman's ovum does not pass down the sin nature. Its the male's seed that does.

Romans 15:12 tells us that sin entered the world through one man. Its been ever since the male's "seed" that passes on the sin nature in copulation. Not the woman's ovum.

That is why we read in Genesis 3:15, that the Messiah would be born of the woman's seed!

God sees Adam as the responsible party.

I hadn't ever quite thought of it that way, but that makes perfect sense.

One thing feminists don't consider -- do you really want the responsibility men have on them? In some ways, women's lives are easier. Housework and raising children isn't like leading nations, going to war, or building complex machinery. Men are held to much higher standards and have greater consequences for failure. They face stricter judgment, as teachers and leaders. "Brethren, let few of you be teachers..."
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

kdm1984

WELS
Oct 8, 2016
309
366
SW MO, USA
✟38,896.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
An angry woman hiding behind the bible. Who’d have guessed.

I understand you disagreed strongly with my post, but your tone is getting increasingly disappointing. We've had several good discussions here in the past, and I've always respected your posts, as you seem to have mine.
 
Upvote 0