- Jun 26, 2015
- 26,368
- 15,457
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
The gun dealer isn't liable either as long as he ran the background check. I'm not liable because I didn't sell the gun to someone without a background check being done. The only person/s responsible for using a legally bought weapon to commit a crime is the person/s who used it.I understand your desire for convenience. But just because a gun dealer did the background check, you sold the gun. Your not going to be any less liable. Gun dealers get sued all the time by individuals and governments attempting to set a president of liability. Now your asking them to also be liable in your place just because they conducted a background check? They couldn’t find insurance to cover for that.
Anyone can try to sue someone in a civil court but if they don't have sufficient grounds the case can be thrown out by the judge.
You just keep trying to muddy the waters of the current universal background checks and I'm wondering why. Is it because you want others to agree that your way would be better?
Well I won't agree because all people involved are better protected the way they are done at the present time. I don't believe in reinventing the wheel if the present design works well and just needs an added spoke or two to reinforce it.
Last edited:
Upvote
0