Guojing
Well-Known Member
I understand Romans 9-11 just fine. Romans 11 does not support "Belief Alone-ism," or "Eternal Security," or a "Sin and Still Be Saved Type Belief," but it supports Conditional Salvation (and or the necessity of Sanctification after God's grace) in the fact that one needs to continue in His goodness, otherwise one will be cut off like the Jews.
22 "if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.
23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again." (Romans 11:22-23).
Note: Not doing what the Lord says is a lack of belief or faith in Him.
For example: If Rick said that his old rocking chair on his porch was able to hold his weight, and he said he believed that with all his heart, would he truly be showing forth that his statement of faith was true if he never sat in the chair? Especially if he was asked to sit in it and yet he refused to do so? In other words, if Rick believed that his porch chair would hold his weight (and he told others this), he would no doubt take the action necessary by sitting in that chair to prove that such a statement was true. Otherwise it would just be an empty profession of faith. In other words, if a person says they love God, and they have no visible good fruit to show that such a thing is true, then it would be just an empty profession of faith that they love God. Meaning, they really do not love God. It would just be a paying of lip service. I mean, a man can say he loves his wife, but if he does nothing to please her in any way, then he really does not love her. Action shows forth whether one's faith is the genuine and the real article vs. it being fake.
Romans 8:13 says if one walks after the flesh (sin), they will die (die spiritually), and if one mortifies the deeds of the body (sin) via by the Spirit, they will live (live spiritually). Romans 8:1 says a similar thing in the King James. We have to walk after the Spirit, and not after the flesh in Christ Jesus in order to not be under the "Condemnation." Jesus said to certain believers who did good works in His name to depart from Him because they worked iniquity (or sin) (See: Matthew 7:23). In my opinion, I would rather be overly cautious with my soul than to play games and be wrong. Would it not be better to live holy and do good works and promote such a thing?
For if one teaches that all future sin is forgiven a person, or if we are saved by having a belief alone in Jesus, we could potentially help to create the next George Sodini (Whether we like it or not).
George Sodini.
I was answering your point about
First, that does not seem consistent with God to do something like that. God is not a respecter of persons. Second, I have heard this view before, and it does not add up. It seems rather convenient that Belief Alone Proponents just so happen to be living in a time where they have things easier (While others later on will not have it so easy). Doesn't seem right.
God made it so easy for us Gentiles to be saved, apart from works, because of that purpose, to make the Jews jealous.
If you don't want to accept the answer, that is fine.
Upvote
0