- Apr 19, 2012
- 30,355
- 5,608
- 32
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
so how do people know which are which?No. Separate hospitals
Upvote
0
so how do people know which are which?No. Separate hospitals
but ERS are not meant to be abused like that so they ought to be permitted to kick people out that do not meet certain requirements.
ERS were not meant to the no cost basic health care solation.
Why wait until it reaches that point where it is the hardest and most expensive to treat?EVERYONE in this country with very few possible exceptions has access to healthcare if they truly need it. That is to say that if someone is currently dying they have access to healthcare.
not if they kicked them out until such time as their condition met the requirement. (Yes, I know that currently that is not an option.) The problems are also more likely to prove fatal the later they are caught.Which leads to the issue I pointed out in the post, the problems get worse when untreated and cost more to remedy later.
As have said, for some they are the only option.
because that is what ERS were designed to treat not petty ( everyday) things.Why wait until it reaches that point where it is the hardest and most expensive to treat?
There is an underlying assumption by many here that the US federal government would be better at running and making decisions about the healthcare of our total population.
not if they kicked them out until such time as their condition met the requirement.
The problems are also more likely to prove fatal the later they are caught.
that is how FOR PROFIT works. If something is for profit it will not last if that is not taken into account.No there isn't. You should learn more about Single Payer.
If you are talking about reimbursement and payment then that is true. But you seem to think that Insurance company employees are somehow better at this. Because right now that is what is happening to you right now. Only difference is insurance companies operate for profit most of the time. So those decisions also include a certain profit-based motive.
1 in 5 uninsured is not awful numbers that still means that even without Obamacare the VAT majority of people are covered.
Again, people "abuse" them because they are the only option that cannot turn them away. Those with no other options, if denied care at an earlier point due to the issue being too minor, will return later when their condition meets your life or death criteria. How is that advantageous for anyone?because that is what ERS were designed to treat not petty ( everyday) things.
That is what ERS are for not for basic care. It clogs the system when people treat them in a way they were not meant to be used.Health issues are not know for resolving due to being denied care.
Yet you want them to be compelled to wait until that stage.
Which is only an issue due to lack of other options.That is what ERS are for not for basic care. It clogs the system when people treat them in a way they were not meant to be used.
that is how FOR PROFIT works. If something is for profit it will not last if that is not taken into account.
How about not for profit? Public utilities are capable of running without someone making an open ended buck.If something is for profit it will not last if that is not taken into account.
that is why I said that is how FOR profit works.How about not for profit? Public utilities are capable of running without someone making an open ended buck.
so they should be able to turn people away who repeatedly clog the system. There is a difference in going to the ER for something that turns out to not be as serious as you thought and going there first thing. For example, right as I am typing this I have a pretty bad cold ( not going to the doctor for that, but I know that if it does not improve or keeps getting worse to make an appointment or if it is very bad go to the hospital, but unless and until then I will get rest, drink water and treat it at home.Which is only an issue due to lack of other options.
You mean selling stuff at cost?I should have said not for profit as an alternative.