The part of the verse, "in saying this he made all meats clean," is NOT represented in the Received Texts nor the Aramaic Peshitta. It is added by translators because of their bias... it isn't in the text. What defiles a man is what comes out... puss, sperm, blood... these make you unclean. And they are a picture of the vile things that come from the heart and mouth. The verse has "nothing" to do with whether or not pork is now food.Radagast did bring up a difficult passage in Mark 7:17-20... how do you read that passage?
Jerry, go back and read it. Paul said you WERE a gentile, WERE an alien of the Commonwealth of Israel, but are NOW (though the blood of Christ) a fellow citizen.
If you go back and look at the 1828 Webster's, you will find that a gentile is anyone who is not a Jew OR a Christian. If you look at today's Webster's... it means anyone who isn't Jewish. The meaning has changed IN ENGLISH and in our culture... but not in the bible and not before a God that does not change. A "gentile Christian" is an oxy-moron because a gentile is a pagan, a heathen, anyone who doesn't belong to God.
Time will tell... but like I said... the name "David" is used abstractly for King Messiah. Just as "Joseph" is used for Messiah as the suffering servant. Real men, real lives... that God used to depict various aspects of Yeshua's work. I am not sure why you feel the need to argue against this, but I guess that's just what Christians do today, argue.
We're done Jerry... I haven't read your post, and won't. You have openly mocked me, you aren't serious about discussion. We don't have to agree, but we should resemble Christian brothers. Have a great life.ken,
1. 1 Chronicles 28:3-4 David said God would not let him build a house for his name because he shed blood.
He said God chose him to be King of Israel forever.
Ezekiel 37:23-25; the Lord God v 21 will be their God v23, v24 and David my servant shall be my King over all of them who was Israel and v25 the Lord God says David shall be prince of Israel forever.
Jesus is never referred to as a servant after the resurrection.
2. There are vice regents in the Bible and it is plain that David will be King over all the tribes of Israel in their national restoration under the Messiah Ezekiel 37:24-25; 34:23-24; Jeremiah 30:9; Hosea 3:5. Christ will be King of Kings and Lord of Lords and all other Kings of eternity and the resurrected Kings and priests Revelation 19:16.
This shows that the spiritual Jew theory that breeds replacement theory is not true.
3. Ephesians 3:6; that the gentiles should be fellow heirs and of the same body and partakes of his promise in Christ by the gospel.
Abraham was s gentile and started the Jewish nation and they became a completely different race and culture.
Gentile Christian is just recognizing a different race in the flesh that is saved.
According to the spiritual aspect there is no Jew or Gentile or male, female etc.
This is because we are all one in Christ spiritually.
So a gentile Christian being an oxymoron is not true across the board.
Jerry Kelso
The part of the verse, "in saying this he made all meats clean," is NOT represented in the Received Texts nor the Aramaic Peshitta. It is added by translators because of their bias... it isn't in the text.
So the oldest full NT we have is in Aramaic, and the line, "in saying this he made all food/meat clean" is not there. I don't believe it is in the TR (Received Texts) because there isn't a translation based on it that includes the line. For example... The NIV, which is really a paraphrase sold as a translations says this:I couldn't find any notes to this effect in my received text translations (KJV, NKJV, YLT)… what is your source for this idea? Not trying to be argumentative, but I would really like to know whether the Received Text omits this statement... it would definitely be welcome if it did. But even my Greek TR+ includes the statement.
Again... just how I see it. You make your own decision.
Blessings.
Ken
I am not against purify or cleanse... the verse IS saying that unclean food would not enter the heart but rather, "enter his aphedrōn, and is eliminated, thus purifying all foods." That word, aphedrōn (G856) is defined by Thayer as "a place where the human waste discharges are dumped" and by Strong's as " place of sitting apart, that is, a privy." The word "privy, in his day, meant "sink or hole, a chamber where waste is stored." The verse is talking about pooping.Hi again, Ken. I did a word study in the NT on the KJV usage of the Greek word katharizō (Strong's 2511), and it is almost always translated as "cleanse" or "purify"... I have to disagree on the meaning here in Mark 7:19, it almost certainly means what most of the translations say: purifying or cleansing... I guess we'll have to agree to disagree agreeably .
This is the argument, those who seek to understand Mark 7:19. I have two versions above, the NIV and NKJV. All the red agrees with the other (though worded differently) and is supported by the Greek. The green underlined part... "in saying this Jesus declared" is NOT supported in the Greek. Meaning... it isn't there, it was inserted by the English translators based on their bias. Right or wrong... it isn't part of the bible it is part of the interpreters understanding.NIV - For it doesn't go into his heart but into his stomach, and then out of his body." (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods "clean.")
NKJV - because it does not enter his heart but his stomach, and is eliminated, thus purifying all foods?"
We're done Jerry... I haven't read your post, and won't. You have openly mocked me, you aren't serious about discussion. We don't have to agree, but we should resemble Christian brothers. Have a great life.
@jerry kelso never mind
Hello everyone! I am wondering how different theological traditions reconcile these two passages. Please let me know what tradition you are from and how you go about making sense of this apparent contradiction.
5:17-20 and Acts 15:5-29
God bless you!
Michael
Hello, I am a member of Messianic Judaism.
In regard to Matthew 5:17-20, "to fulfill the Law" means "to cause God's will (as made known in the Law) to be obeyed as it should be" (NAS Greek Lexicon pleroo 2c3). After Jesus said he came to fulfill the Law in Matthew 5, this is precisely what he then proceeded to do six times throughout the rest of the chapter by teaching how to correctly understand and obey it. In Galatians 5:14, loving your neighbor fulfills the entire Law, so Jesus was one of countless people who have done that. In Galatians 6:2 says that bearing one another's burdens fulfills the Law of Christ, so you should interpret it in the same way as fulfilling the Law and the Prophets, namely obeying it as it should be. In Romans 15:18-19, it says that Paul fulfilled the Gospel, which again referred to causing Gentiles to become fully obedient to it in word and in deed.
Jesus said that not the least part would disappear from the Law until heaven and earth pass away and all is accomplished, neither of which has happened yet, both of which either refer to end times or are ways of saying that it will never happen. In Matthew 28:20, Jesus said that he would always be with us until the end of the age, which is a way of saying that he is never going to leave us, not saying that he will leave us at the end of the age. Jesus also warned those who relaxed the least part of the Law or taught others to do the same would be called least in the Kingdom while those who obeyed them and taught others to do the same would be called great in the Kingdom, which is a warning that more people should take seriously.
In regard to Acts 15:1-29, they were wanting to require all Gentiles to become circumcised in order to become saved, however, that was never the purpose for which God command circumcision. So the problem was that circumcision was being used for a man-made purpose that went above and beyond the purpose that God commanded it for. So the Jerusalem Council upheld God's Law by correctly ruling against that requirement, and a ruling against requiring Gentiles to do something that God never commanded should not be mistaken as being a ruling against requiring Gentiles to obey what God has commanded.
In Deuteronomy 30:11-20, God said His Law was not too difficult to obey and that obedience to it brings life and a blessing while disobedience brings death and a curse, so choose life! So it was presented as a possibility and choice and Acts 15:10 should not be interpreted as being in direct disagreement with God and as teaching Gentiles to choose death instead of life. The Jerusalem Council did not have the authority to countermand God or to tell anyone not to obey any of His laws, nor did they attempt to do so, nor should we follow them instead of following God even if that was what they were trying to do.
As previously noted, the issue they they were discussing was not God's Law itself, but in regard to man-made requirements that had been added on top of God's Law. By becoming circumcised, a Gentile was becoming a Jewish proselyte and agreeing to live as a Jew according to all of their oral law, traditions, rulings, and fences, which Jesus also criticized as placing a heavy burden on the back of the people (Matthew 23:2-4). Paul's problem with the Judaizers was not that they were teaching Gentiles how to obey God as though that were somehow a negative thing, but rather his problem was that they were teaching that Gentiles had to follow God's Law according to all of oral traditions in order to become saved.
Either the four laws listed in Acts 15:19-21 are an exhaustive list for mature believers or they are not. There are 1,050 commandments in the NT, so if they were an exhaustive list, then that would disregard over 99% of the commandments in the NT, including those expounded upon by Jesus. Clearly, they were they were not an exhaustive list for mature believers, but stated, it was a list intended not to make things too difficult for new believers coming to faith, which they excused in verse 21 by saying that they would continue to learn how to obey Moses by hearing him taught every Sabbath in the synagogues. In other words, when you have Gentiles coming out of paganism who know nothing about Christianity, in order to avoid overwhelming them it becomes an issue the determine which things are important to teach them right away and which things can be taught over time as they mature in their faith.
soyeong,
1. The Mosaic law has to be understand as one whole law that is either fully in force or completely abolished.
James 2:10; For whosoever shall keep the whole law and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
2 Corinthians 3:13; And not as Moses, which put a veil over his face, that the children of Israel could not steadfastly look to the end of that which is abolished.
Galatians 3:19; Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of the mediator.
Galatians 4:21-31; talks about those who wanted to be under the Mosaic Law.
Vers 24; Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the Mount Sinai which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
The context distinguishes the Old Covenant system which was bondage from the New Covenant system is freedom vs 30-31.
Romans 7:4; Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become to the dead to the law by the body of Christ that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.
Hebrews 7:19; For the law (Moses) made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope didn’t d; by the which we draw nigh unto God.
2. Jesus spoke Matthew 5:17-18 he was under the Old Mosaic system.
He fulfilled the law by fulfilling prophecies such as Isaiah 61:1-2a in Luke 4:18.
He also fulfilled the law by being sinless to be the perfect sinless sacrificial lamb John 1:29; Hebrews 9:14-15.
Matthew 5:18; till Heaven and earth pass , one jot or one tittle shall in no way pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
This doesn’t reconcile with the verse above that says the Mosaic law was abolished.
Till all be fulfilled is saying the Mosaic Law was guaranteed till the Messiah’s work was done which happened at the cross. It had reached its goal Romans 10:4 as the system to live by because the church was ordained and it was prophesied that the Jewish nation would reject him Isaiah 53:3,7,8.
2. The law was to be forever for the Jews but under the New Covenant Jeremiah 31:3–34.
3. It is not wrong for a Jew to be a Jew culturally.
Today they are a part of the body of Christ Ephesians 2:14-15. Ephesians 3:6 has the Gentiles are in the same body that they should be fellow heirs and partakers if his promise in Christ by the gospel.
2. People under the Mosaic Law were looking at types and shadows and they had to look at everything as pointing to salvation and they were obligated to do those things or suffer the judgement which was a curse Galatians 3:13.
3. The Mosaic law was holy and good but couldn’t save a person and the law of sin and death took advantage of the law that was holy and good and made those Jews live to the frailty of man and sin more than being overcomers Romans 7. The law of sin and death was done away by the law of the spirit Romans 8:2.
4. The morals are in every age. Under the law of conscience there was no written law.
Under the Mosaic law it was written and they had a specific Judgement of violated, or a specific blessing if they performed it.
The church is not under this specific blessing and cursing system.
The civil law is for lawless and disobedient and the ungodly and sinners etc. not a righteous man 1 Timothy 1:9-10.
The New Covenant was built on better promises and we are not to be subdued by the law.
Being Christians is about being who we are in Christ and what he did on the cross and through his resurrection not doing by self effort caused by the law of sin and death.
It doesn’t mean no one could live the whole law Some of the time for Elizabeth and Zacharias walking in all the commandments and ordinances were blameless Luke 1:6.
It also doesn’t mean it was not to be who they were for the just we’re to live by faith Habakkuk 2:4.
5. The ceremonial law according to salvation such as sacrificing lambs, ordinances etc. Hebrews 9. The blood is the New Testament vs 20.
The priesthood was changed from the Aaronic to the Melchizedek 16-28.
Vs 18; For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitable was thereof.
Though talking about the priesthood this verse really fits the whole reason why the Old covenant was abolished.
6. Jesus was born under the law of Moses Galatians 4:4 and taught the Mosaic law Matthew 7:12 and the Kingdom of Heaven message only for Israel Matthew 10:6-7.
This was not a message to the church of the New Covenant Matthew 5:4; 5:13; 16:18.
The true church is not backslidden and have not been trodden under the feet of men like Israel because the Gates of Hell will never prevail against us. Jerry Kelso
Jesus specifically said that He came not to abolish the Law (Matthew 5:17) and Paul also confirmed that our faith does not abolish our need to obey the Law, but rather our faith upholds it (Romans 3:31), so I don't see any grounds for arguing that the Law has been abolished. All of God's righteous laws are eternal (Psalms 119:160), so none of them will never be abolished and instructions for how to act in accordance with God's righteousness can't be abolished without first abolishing God's eternal righteousness. In Deuteronomy 4:2, it is a sin to add to or subtract from God's Law, so anyone who claims that any of God's Laws have been abolish has sinned and needs to repent. Likewise, in Deuteronomy 13:4-5, the way that God instructed His people to determine that someone was a false prophet was if they taught against obeying His Law, so God simply did not leave us any room to follow someone who claimed that any of His Laws have been abolished.
While we are under the New Covenant and not the Mosaic Covenant, we are nevertheless still under the same God with the same nature and therefore the same instructions for how to walk in the same ways and express the same character traits. For example, the way to act in accordance with God's righteousness is straightforwardly based on God's righteousness, not on any particular covenant. God's righteousness is eternal, so any instructions that He has ever given for how to act in accordance with His righteousness are eternally valid regardless of which covenant we are under, but as part of the New Covenant we are told that those who do not follow those instructions are not children of God (1 John 3:10). In Jeremiah 31:33, the New Covenant involves God writing His Law on our hearts so that we will obey it, so it still involves following God's eternal Law, so while the Mosaic Covenant has become obsolete, God's eternal righteousness and righteous Law did not become obsolete along with it.
Sin was in the world before the Law was given (Romans 5:13), so there was nothing that became righteous or sinful when it was given, but rather it revealed what has always been and will always be sinful. If you believe that the Law was given to reveal what sin is and that we should refrain from doing what God has revealed to be sin, then you should agree that we should obey God's Law.
God's Law brings us to Christ because everything in it teaches us about who he is, how to walk as he walked, and how to grow in a relationship with Him. Now that Christ has come we have a superior teacher, but the subject matter is still how to walk in God's ways in obedience to His Law in accordance with what he taught by word and by example. The reason that the Law brings us to Christ is not so that we can reject what he taught and go back to living in sin.
The laws that someone gives teach us about what they value and who they are as a person. For example, someone who is trustworthy gives laws that are trustworthy and someone who is giving laws that aren't trustworthy should not be considered to be trustworthy, so the opinion that we have of a law matches the opinion that we have of the lawgiver. God is trustworthy, so all of His laws therefore are also trustworthy (Psalms 19:7, Nehemiah 9:13) and laws that are holy, righteous, and good can only come from a God who is holy, righteous, and good (Romans 7:12). So if you have such a poor opinion of God's Law that you consider it to be bondage, then you must have an equally poor opinion of God for giving it. The Psalms express an extremely positive view of God's Law, such as with David repeatedly saying that he loved it and delighted in obeying it, which Paul also did (Romans 7:12), so if you consider the Psalms to be Scripture and to therefore express a correct view of God's Law, then you will share it.
In Romans 7:1-4, it is speaking about a woman being bound to the law to her husband while he lives, but if her husband were to die, then she would be released from the law of marriage. If she were to get married to another man, then she would still be required to refrain from committing adultery, so at no point was she set free from from obeying God's Law.
The Mosaic Law made nothing perfect because it wasn't given for that purpose, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't obey it for the purposes for which it was given.
In Galatians 5:14, anyone who has ever loved their neighbor has fulfilled the entire law, so while Jesus being sinless was an example of fulfilling the Law, it was was by no means the only example. While Jesus certainly accomplished much on the cross, there is still the second coming and everything that Revelation says comes with that left to accomplish, so not all has been accomplish. Likewise, heaven and earth have not passed away, so neither condition has been met.
It wouldn't make any sense for Jesus to go to the cross so that we could reject everything that he spent his ministry teaching us how to do. In Titus 2:14, it doesn't say that Jesus gave himself to redeem us from any laws, but to redeem us from all Lawlessness and to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so if we believe in Messiah's work on the cross, then we will become zealous for doing good works in obedience to his Law and will not return to the Lawlessness that he gave himself to redeem us from. In Romans 10:4, a relationship with Jesus for righteousness for everyone who has faith is the goal of obeying the Law.
While it is good to correctly understand whom the Law was given to, it is not good to focus on that so much that you lose sight of whom it was give by because it was given to teach us about who God is, how to walk in His ways, and how to express His character traits in accordance with His nature. By expressing God's character traits through our actions in obedience to God's Law, we are expressing our love for who He is, we are sanctifying His name, and we are testifying to the world about who He is through acting as a light to the world (Matthew 5:13-16). In Deuteronomy 4:5-8, the intended reaction of the nations seeing Israel's obedience to God's Law was to marvel at how great and wise He is, so again our obedience to God's Law is about testifying about who He is, which means that the Law was intended to be used as a tool to evangelize the nations and to bless them by teaching them to repent from their wickedness and how to walk in God's ways, to the Jew first and then to the Gentile (Acts 3:25-26).
If Gentiles are part of the same body, then Gentiles also have the privilege and the delight of getting to follow the instructions that God gave to that body for how to follow Him.
The Mosaic Law is full of important foreshadows that teach us about who God is and about His plan of redemption and the light if Christ brings full substance to the foreshadows so that we can fully see what God was teaching us through them, which make them all the more important to continue to observe. For example, in 1 Corinthians 5:6-8, Paul spoke in regard to how Passover foreshadowed Christ by drawing the connection of him being our Passover Lamb. However, instead of concluding that we no longer need to bother keeping Passover, he concluded that we should therefore continue to keep it.
The Mosaic Law is holy, righteous, and good straightforwardly because it is God's instructions for how to act in accordance with His holiness, righteousness, and goodness. God's Law doesn't save us straightforwardly because it was never given for that purpose, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't obey it for the purposes for which it was given. I'm glad that you recognize that the law of sin and death worked in opposite to the Mosaic Law and that it does away with the law of sin and death.
Our conscience is informed by the highest level or moral law that we believe. However, our conscience part of our fallen nature, so it is not perfect, which is why Paul said in 1 Corinthians 4:3 that even though he was not aware of anything against himself he was not justified. So our conscience helps us to live in accordance with the moral law, but it does not replace it, and therefore is not the ultimate determiner of our spiritual condition. Our conscience is capable of warning us when our spiritual condition is in danger, but it is not God's Law, and needs to be informed by God's Law in order to function correctly.
In Romans 14, there are weak Christians whose conscience is not informed in a mature way, where their conscience won't let them do what they really would be free to do, so again our conscience does not replace God's Law. Someone's conscience can be so misinformed that their glory is in their shame (Philippians 3:19), where both their mind and their conscience are defiled (Titus 1:15). So the first way to destroy the work of conscience is to misinform it where you don't give it the true Law of God and the second way is to silence it when it speaks. In 1 Timothy 4:2, Paul spoke about a wounded or seared conscience, and a good indicator of this is if someone sees nothing wrong with continuing to do what God has revealed in His Law to be sin.
The blessings and curses work kind of like gravity. We teach certain behaviors to our children for their own good, but if they refuse to obey them, then it will be to their detriment without us needing to take an active role in bringing that about. God has said that His Law is for our own good (Deuteronomy 6:24, 10:12-13), so if we believe Him, then we will obey His Law.
The Bible does not use that category of civil law. In 1 Timothy 1:8, Paul said that God's Law is good if one obeys it properly, so verses 9-10 should not be used to argue that it isn't good for us to obey. Instructions for how to do what is righteous are not needed by those who are areadly doing what is righteous, but by those who are not. Those who try to use verses 9-10 to try to exempt themselves from following God's instructions thereby become someone that those instructions are for.
While Jeremiah 31 describes the New Covenant as being based on better promises, it does not say that we are not to be subdued by the Law, but rather it says that the New Covenant involves God putting His Law in our minds and writing it on our hearts so that we will obey it. A Christian is a follower of Christ and Christ followed the Mosaic Law, so a Christian is also someone who follows the Mosaic Law. In 1 John 2:6, those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way he walked, and he walked in obedience to the Law. In Galatians 3:10-12, Paul associated a quote from Habakkuk 2:4 with a quote from Leviticus 18:5, so the righteous who are living by faith are the same as the ones who are living in obedience to the Mosaic Law.
The Bible does not use the category of ceremonial law.
Jesus taught the Mosaic Law by both word and by example, and we seek to follow what he taught, the we should obey the Mosaic Law. There is no point in someone wanting to become a follower of Jesus while not wanting to follow him. In the Great Commission, Jesus sent his disciples out to teach the nations all that he had taught them, and he spent his ministry teaching his disciples how to obey the Mosaic Law by word and by example.
soyeong,
1. I gave you the the scriptures on abolishment of the Mosaic law and you could not address them and couldn’t refute them.
2. You misunderstand the weakness of the commandment because of the mechanics and the curses of the old covenant versus the better promises of the New Covenant.
3. The law was holy and good and there are eternal truths in it.
It has important truths for history, daily living and prophecies concerning the Messiah’s First and Second coming and the restoration of Israel and the earth.
4. All the Bible is for us in the proper perspective.
Moral laws were before Israel but the conscience wasn’t completely adequate as the written law to reveal sin and what we should do or not do.
The purification laws including water baptism as a type of salvation that they had to do or they could die.
This is part of the reason that some believe in baptismal regeneration.
Under the New Covenant water baptism is the answer to a good conscience toward God not the filth of the flesh by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
5. Moral laws are always in effect because we are not to sin. But they were in a different context in different ages of which I have already explained.
Thy word is a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path. Do you really think I am going to elimate that truth because it is in the Old Covenant which was abolished and because we are under the New Covenant?
I believe in understanding about the Jewish Perspective.
The Old Testament concealed is the New Testament revealed.
The righteousness of the law of Moses was those who do them shall live in them Romans 10
Gentiles would say this is performance based and not being who they were in God.
The Jews would say that it was to be who they were.
Both would be right.
Performance based because of the law of sin and death took advantage of the law that was holy and good and caused self effort and live to the frailty of man and sin more than overcome sin. Romans 7.
There were many Jews that living for God was who they were. There whole lives were law of Moses.
But, because the law could only say thou shalt not but did not have the power to help the Jew perform the commandment.
It took the power of an endless life which was Jesus the crucified and resurrected Lord.
The teachings of Jesus were under the Mosaic Law and were do, do, do and today it is what he did, what he did, what he did.
You said in one statement we are not under the Mosaic law and in another statement you said we were. That is an oxymoron.
Even the Jews cannot live the whole law because of no temple. James 2:10; For whosoever shall keep the whole law and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
Jesus taught the Mosaic Law and he didn’t preach the New Covenant because he would be guilty of preaching false doctrine.
Hebrews 9:16-17; For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.
For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.
Jesus never taught his death, burial, and resurrection for the Jew to be saved by.
This doesn’t diminish the teachings of the law by Jesus or that he fulfilled the law with his finished work.
It means that he fulfilled the law until the cross where it’s goal had been reached and the Mosaic law had served its time and was abolished at the cross so the second covenant could take its place Hebrews 8:6-7.
The body of Christ is made up of Jews and Gentiles under the New covenant according to the the finished work of Christ not the Mosaic law.
6. The New Covenant was ratified at Calvary.
The Jewish nation has not received the New Covenant.
Hebrews 8:13 Israel will receive the New Covenant which will be in the future which will not be like the the one he made with the fathers in Egypt. This was the Mosaic law.
I will stop here and answer to your scriptures from your post next by tonight or tomorrow as it is late.
I do hope you understand I am not against the Old Testament but in proper perspective. Jerry Kelso
Jesus specifically said that He came not to abolish the Law (Matthew 5:17) and Paul also confirmed that our faith does not abolish our need to obey the Law, but rather our faith upholds it (Romans 3:31), so I don't see any grounds for arguing that the Law has been abolished. All of God's righteous laws are eternal (Psalms 119:160), so none of them will never be abolished and instructions for how to act in accordance with God's righteousness can't be abolished without first abolishing God's eternal righteousness. In Deuteronomy 4:2, it is a sin to add to or subtract from God's Law, so anyone who claims that any of God's Laws have been abolish has sinned and needs to repent. Likewise, in Deuteronomy 13:4-5, the way that God instructed His people to determine that someone was a false prophet was if they taught against obeying His Law, so God simply did not leave us any room to follow someone who claimed that any of His Laws have been abolished.
While we are under the New Covenant and not the Mosaic Covenant, we are nevertheless still under the same God with the same nature and therefore the same instructions for how to walk in the same ways and express the same character traits. For example, the way to act in accordance with God's righteousness is straightforwardly based on God's righteousness, not on any particular covenant. God's righteousness is eternal, so any instructions that He has ever given for how to act in accordance with His righteousness are eternally valid regardless of which covenant we are under, but as part of the New Covenant we are told that those who do not follow those instructions are not children of God (1 John 3:10). In Jeremiah 31:33, the New Covenant involves God writing His Law on our hearts so that we will obey it, so it still involves following God's eternal Law, so while the Mosaic Covenant has become obsolete, God's eternal righteousness and righteous Law did not become obsolete along with it.
Sin was in the world before the Law was given (Romans 5:13), so there was nothing that became righteous or sinful when it was given, but rather it revealed what has always been and will always be sinful. If you believe that the Law was given to reveal what sin is and that we should refrain from doing what God has revealed to be sin, then you should agree that we should obey God's Law.
God's Law brings us to Christ because everything in it teaches us about who he is, how to walk as he walked, and how to grow in a relationship with Him. Now that Christ has come we have a superior teacher, but the subject matter is still how to walk in God's ways in obedience to His Law in accordance with what he taught by word and by example. The reason that the Law brings us to Christ is not so that we can reject what he taught and go back to living in sin.
The laws that someone gives teach us about what they value and who they are as a person. For example, someone who is trustworthy gives laws that are trustworthy and someone who is giving laws that aren't trustworthy should not be considered to be trustworthy, so the opinion that we have of a law matches the opinion that we have of the lawgiver. God is trustworthy, so all of His laws therefore are also trustworthy (Psalms 19:7, Nehemiah 9:13) and laws that are holy, righteous, and good can only come from a God who is holy, righteous, and good (Romans 7:12). So if you have such a poor opinion of God's Law that you consider it to be bondage, then you must have an equally poor opinion of God for giving it. The Psalms express an extremely positive view of God's Law, such as with David repeatedly saying that he loved it and delighted in obeying it, which Paul also did (Romans 7:12), so if you consider the Psalms to be Scripture and to therefore express a correct view of God's Law, then you will share it.
In Romans 7:1-4, it is speaking about a woman being bound to the law to her husband while he lives, but if her husband were to die, then she would be released from the law of marriage. If she were to get married to another man, then she would still be required to refrain from committing adultery, so at no point was she set free from from obeying God's Law.
The Mosaic Law made nothing perfect because it wasn't given for that purpose, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't obey it for the purposes for which it was given.
In Galatians 5:14, anyone who has ever loved their neighbor has fulfilled the entire law, so while Jesus being sinless was an example of fulfilling the Law, it was was by no means the only example. While Jesus certainly accomplished much on the cross, there is still the second coming and everything that Revelation says comes with that left to accomplish, so not all has been accomplish. Likewise, heaven and earth have not passed away, so neither condition has been met.
It wouldn't make any sense for Jesus to go to the cross so that we could reject everything that he spent his ministry teaching us how to do. In Titus 2:14, it doesn't say that Jesus gave himself to redeem us from any laws, but to redeem us from all Lawlessness and to purify for himself a people of his own possession who are zealous for doing good works, so if we believe in Messiah's work on the cross, then we will become zealous for doing good works in obedience to his Law and will not return to the Lawlessness that he gave himself to redeem us from. In Romans 10:4, a relationship with Jesus for righteousness for everyone who has faith is the goal of obeying the Law.
While it is good to correctly understand whom the Law was given to, it is not good to focus on that so much that you lose sight of whom it was give by because it was given to teach us about who God is, how to walk in His ways, and how to express His character traits in accordance with His nature. By expressing God's character traits through our actions in obedience to God's Law, we are expressing our love for who He is, we are sanctifying His name, and we are testifying to the world about who He is through acting as a light to the world (Matthew 5:13-16). In Deuteronomy 4:5-8, the intended reaction of the nations seeing Israel's obedience to God's Law was to marvel at how great and wise He is, so again our obedience to God's Law is about testifying about who He is, which means that the Law was intended to be used as a tool to evangelize the nations and to bless them by teaching them to repent from their wickedness and how to walk in God's ways, to the Jew first and then to the Gentile (Acts 3:25-26).
If Gentiles are part of the same body, then Gentiles also have the privilege and the delight of getting to follow the instructions that God gave to that body for how to follow Him.
The Mosaic Law is full of important foreshadows that teach us about who God is and about His plan of redemption and the light if Christ brings full substance to the foreshadows so that we can fully see what God was teaching us through them, which make them all the more important to continue to observe. For example, in 1 Corinthians 5:6-8, Paul spoke in regard to how Passover foreshadowed Christ by drawing the connection of him being our Passover Lamb. However, instead of concluding that we no longer need to bother keeping Passover, he concluded that we should therefore continue to keep it.
The Mosaic Law is holy, righteous, and good straightforwardly because it is God's instructions for how to act in accordance with His holiness, righteousness, and goodness. God's Law doesn't save us straightforwardly because it was never given for that purpose, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't obey it for the purposes for which it was given. I'm glad that you recognize that the law of sin and death worked in opposite to the Mosaic Law and that it does away with the law of sin and death.
Our conscience is informed by the highest level or moral law that we believe. However, our conscience part of our fallen nature, so it is not perfect, which is why Paul said in 1 Corinthians 4:3 that even though he was not aware of anything against himself he was not justified. So our conscience helps us to live in accordance with the moral law, but it does not replace it, and therefore is not the ultimate determiner of our spiritual condition. Our conscience is capable of warning us when our spiritual condition is in danger, but it is not God's Law, and needs to be informed by God's Law in order to function correctly.
In Romans 14, there are weak Christians whose conscience is not informed in a mature way, where their conscience won't let them do what they really would be free to do, so again our conscience does not replace God's Law. Someone's conscience can be so misinformed that their glory is in their shame (Philippians 3:19), where both their mind and their conscience are defiled (Titus 1:15). So the first way to destroy the work of conscience is to misinform it where you don't give it the true Law of God and the second way is to silence it when it speaks. In 1 Timothy 4:2, Paul spoke about a wounded or seared conscience, and a good indicator of this is if someone sees nothing wrong with continuing to do what God has revealed in His Law to be sin.
The blessings and curses work kind of like gravity. We teach certain behaviors to our children for their own good, but if they refuse to obey them, then it will be to their detriment without us needing to take an active role in bringing that about. God has said that His Law is for our own good (Deuteronomy 6:24, 10:12-13), so if we believe Him, then we will obey His Law.
The Bible does not use that category of civil law. In 1 Timothy 1:8, Paul said that God's Law is good if one obeys it properly, so verses 9-10 should not be used to argue that it isn't good for us to obey. Instructions for how to do what is righteous are not needed by those who are areadly doing what is righteous, but by those who are not. Those who try to use verses 9-10 to try to exempt themselves from following God's instructions thereby become someone that those instructions are for.
While Jeremiah 31 describes the New Covenant as being based on better promises, it does not say that we are not to be subdued by the Law, but rather it says that the New Covenant involves God putting His Law in our minds and writing it on our hearts so that we will obey it. A Christian is a follower of Christ and Christ followed the Mosaic Law, so a Christian is also someone who follows the Mosaic Law. In 1 John 2:6, those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way he walked, and he walked in obedience to the Law. In Galatians 3:10-12, Paul associated a quote from Habakkuk 2:4 with a quote from Leviticus 18:5, so the righteous who are living by faith are the same as the ones who are living in obedience to the Mosaic Law.
The Bible does not use the category of ceremonial law.
Jesus taught the Mosaic Law by both word and by example, and we seek to follow what he taught, the we should obey the Mosaic Law. There is no point in someone wanting to become a follower of Jesus while not wanting to follow him. In the Great Commission, Jesus sent his disciples out to teach the nations all that he had taught them, and he spent his ministry teaching his disciples how to obey the Mosaic Law by word and by example.