Is Macroevolution Religion?

Aman777 said:

I agree since it's not nice to pick on the uninformed. I promise not to ask any more scientific questions of you.

Click to expand...

You never have. Thats why I’m not interested. Your unique take on christianity is pretty boring.

VirOptimus said:

There is no faith in the ToE.

Click to expand...

Can anyone tell us the process by which mindless Nature inserted the intelligence of Adam, which is like God's, Genesis 3:22 into prehistoric people? My point is that NO one can explain their faith/belief in the false ToE. They hide or call names but NONE of them can explain their belief in such rubbish. Is it a cult of the uninformed?

Aman777 said:

Can anyone tell us the process by which mindless Nature inserted the intelligence of Adam, which is like God's, Genesis 3:22 into prehistoric people? My point is that NO one can explain their faith/belief in the false ToE. They hide or call names but NONE of them can explain their belief in such rubbish. Is it a cult of the uninformed?

Click to expand...

You cant quit me?

VirOptimus said:

You never have. Thats why I’m not interested. Your unique take on christianity is pretty boring.

Click to expand...

You don't like it because I have the support of the agreement of Scripture with science, history, genetics and every other discovered Truth of mankind, to support my views. It is really boring and frustrating to those who worship at the Altar of Evolutionism since it refutes (proves wrong) their devotion to such a false theory.

VirOptimus said:

You cant quit me?

Click to expand...

I never said I would. All I promised was to not ask you scientific questions. I detected that it embarrassed you so I quit asking. Notice that I didn't ask you but instead I addressed it to:

Aman777 said: ↑
Can anyone tell us the process by which mindless Nature inserted the intelligence of Adam, which is like God's, Genesis 3:22 into prehistoric people?

inquiring mind said:

I guess what we should be discussing... is whether macroevolution qualifies as a religion, or not?

Click to expand...

No, no it doesn't. End of discussion.

inquiring mind said:

As in the context of: despite lack of definitive evidence

Click to expand...

Except there isn't lack of definitive evidence. You're trying to frame the discussion starting from a false premise. Which is why we ought to be discussing the mindset that leads to this view in the first place.

Aman777 said:

ou don't like it because I have the support of the agreement of Scripture with science, history, genetics and every other discovered Truth of mankind, to support my views.

Click to expand...

You don't support your views though. You make a bunch of unsupported claims and then when are challenged, you make even more unsupported claims to reinforce the initial unsupported claims. Then you try to switch the burden of proof.

Your shtick is not impressive for those of us familiar with it.

Aman777 said:

Identify the process, please.

Click to expand...

It's called evolution. It's observable process.

And if you're wondering how certain properties can emerge that haven't previously existed, Google "emergence". It's a well studied concept.

See, all of this stuff is known, studied and with information well available for anyone who wants it. The fact you ask the question in the first place speaks more about your lack of genuine interest than anything else.

inquiring mind said:

Please point the rule infraction out to me and I'll correct it.

Click to expand...

Addition to the Statement of Purpose

pitabread said:

Addition to the Statement of Purpose

Click to expand...

Thanks.