Why are Catholics and Orthodox treated differently by protestants?

~Anastasia~

† Handmaid of God †
Dec 1, 2013
31,133
17,455
Florida panhandle, USA
✟922,775.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Interesting, but about the idea it was the first moment in scripture, chapter 6 in Matthew for instance is well before chapter 23 in time we think because we believe Matthew is generally chronological. Right?

We happened to have just read chapter 23 in our Sunday morning Bible study, and I spoke up and said I'd like to hear commentaries on those first 12 verses. Even though we all know a commentary is just an informed opinion generally (and so also I view many doctrines people come up with). The meaning I ended up with is that He is saying in the 12 verses several things, including crucially that while we here can be teachers of one another none of us ever is the Teacher -- only He is.

So, also, in like form, while someone can be a 'father' to another, as Paul used the word for example, we all have only one Father, alone, Who is our truly "Father" with a capital letter if you like (as a way to understand He is singularly our only Father, there is no other) -- God alone is our "Father" in that true Father way, and no man can be even partly a substitute for God in that way -- Christ commands us to pray directly to God our Father in Matthew 6 of course as you know, and that's another instance of how only He alone is our "Father" in this capital way. (Perhaps this thread should be moved to the Justin's forum if we discuss this much


"We are not to call anyone Father, Teacher, etc. as an extreme honorific. If it's meant to kind of show them as being far above us, it's done wrongly. "

Asking for a clarification or language understanding --

Isn't this instead the actual Orthodox position --> Not only is none 'far' above others, but nor is anyone even "partly" above -- "You are all brothers" [and sisters of course] Christ said directly to us.

He emphasizes there that none are above anyone else, and I know it's the Orthodox position I've heard here that no bishop is above the others. But I'm assuming that's part of the general situation, that the Orthodox position is precisely like Christ said to the disciples in the beginning of Matthew 18 and again in 23 (v11 for instance), right? That anyone in the Orthodox church would then be expected to be only a servant to the others? Is that correct?
Sorry I didn't mean to imply a hierarchy among people, no. There IS a certain ecclesiastical hierarchy for some organizational purposes, but no one is more "important" than anyone else (nor should we seek to be) and in the council it is my understanding that the vote of each bishop is equal. I'm probably not explaining very well. But the Patriarch of Constantinople (essentially the "highest-ranking" hierarch) is called "the first among equals". He has some administrative responsibilities but is also equal to all the others - it's nothing like the Pope in Catholicism, who is not only considered paramount but also now infallible in certain circumstances.

Sorry - too many words and I know I'm not explaining well.

Orthodoxy isn't about ranking, period. If there is any right competition, it's maybe joked about among the monastics in their efforts to be least - not greatest. But even that can't be overdone or a reverse-pride can be at work.

It was just my way of trying to illustrate that Jesus was talking about the lofty way some religious leaders were set up and admired - and that we are not supposed to do that.

I wasn't making any point about the Church at all. I apologize for the confusion. :)
 
Upvote 0

Gregory95

You will know them by their fruits
Jan 15, 2019
859
289
29
missouri
✟37,762.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi Gregory. :)

No problems - we have to ask to get answers, then we have to weigh them. I'll offer a few thoughts on a few of your questions regarding Scripture and the early Church at least. That part of history I'll leave to others. :)



You're right that context is important. That's where the understanding of the Body that received Scripture (before it was Scripture) can help. After all, Paul refers to himself as Timothy's father, and says that we have many teachers but not many fathers. So with no understanding, we'd have a contradiction in Scripture.

We are not to call anyone Father, Teacher, etc. as an extreme honorific. If it's meant to kind of show them as being far above us, it's done wrongly. The "Fathers" in the right context are like actual fathers - they use their wisdom to guide, they protect as they can, they pray for and take care of their sons and daughters, they bear their burdens, suffer over them, serve them. Yes, they are leaders in a sense, but not dictatorial ones. Servants to all, in a sense. I'm not sure if that helps. But if you accept all of Scripture, you have to see that "Father" is not always a forbidden term.

As far as what Catholics might believe, I'm not sure. The priest never "becomes Christ" for us. He does fulfill a priestly role, which the ultimate High Priest is of course Jesus.

We do also have the Sacrament of Confession. The early Church also practiced Confession (generally not privately) ... Jesus did give authority to the Apostles to release or retain sins. BUT ... I want to say that we consider the priest to be only a witness. It is Christ we actually confess to, and Christ who forgives. If a person came to Confession and secretly planned to go right on sinning afterwards, the priest might believe him repentant and might read the prayers that say he is forgiven - but God knows the heart and that is ultimately what matters.




We do have a direct line to God. :) That is always available. But the word "pray" has changed its meaning over time, which causes confusion.

To pray used to be simply a request. You know the older English? "Pray tell, when will the doctor return?" It's not Worship or any such thing - just a request.

Prayers to the Saints are simply asking them to pray for us, much the same as you might ask your pastor or your very godly grandmother to pray for you. We know that "the effectual fervent prayer of a godly man availeth much" ... and who is more godly and effectual than people who love us and are already beyond the temptation and struggle of this life and are now in the presence of Jesus?

Usually there is a question about how or if they can hear us, and whether that is trying to communicate with the dead. The answer is that we do NOT seek to bring them up or converse with them or get them to answer. That would be beyond foolish! (And possibly a demon might offer to trick us!) But they are not omniscient. Like the souls of the martyrs under the throne in Revelation who ask about God's response to what they know is happening on earth, the Saints in heaven only know what they know because they are in communion with Jesus -- and He knows everything.




I hope you don't mind me replying btw. It's just something I enjoy. And if it can help, I'm glad.

We don't pray the Rosary. There are some things about the Rosary (that I've heard) that are taught against by the early Desert Fathers (like imagining certain things during prayer). We usually don't repeat a lot of prayers - mostly prayers are said once during a prayer session except for short phrases like "Glory to the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit" which might be repeated between other prayers.

An exception is the Jesus Prayer, but that would take a whole lot more to explain. Not everyone prays it, and not everyone who prays it does so with the intention it is supposed to do - very basically it is to teach us to remember God all the time - always - and to teach the heart to pray all the time - unceasing prayer.

But that's really quite different from the Rosary.

Catholics have various things (I'm not sure how widely believed or practiced) that a Rosary can be prayed for a person based on so many days or so many times, just as they sometimes have other actions or prayers they do x-number of times or at certain times - this theology tends to be connected to their doctrine of purgatory or the Catholic idea that all sins require temporal punishment, or are connected to "graces" God gives, but we also don't believe in measured grace or grace as a "thing" ... rather it is the energies of God through which He interacts with mankind.

Anyway. My little attempts to help. Forgive me if anything I've said makes it worse, and feel free to ask further if I've made it more confused or brought up other questions.

God be with you.
Thank you very informative friend and well said thank you ! Ill think on the words you spoke and if I think of more ill send them your way if you don't mind

May the Holy Spirit guide us and not the flesh!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ~Anastasia~
Upvote 0

nutroll

Veteran
Apr 26, 2006
2,221
1,300
47
Boise, ID
Visit site
✟279,660.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
In the world we will not find examples of hierarchy without an imbalance of power or prestige. And yet, when we look at the Holy Trinity there is hierarchy with absolute unity. This is what the Church possesses (though it can be abused by its members) -- a hierarchy with absolute unity which indeed flows from God. So even in calling a priest Father, we recognize a hierarchy and we give honor and respect to the priest, not as underlings grovelling for something in return but in love and unity. We call our bishops Master in a the same manner. But Bishops, Priests and Deacons live lives of service to God toward His Church. They may be masters and fathers, but they seek to serve everyone else. Again, it is always possible to point to abuses or poor examples, but most of the priests and bishops I know spend most of their efforts toward serving others and very little toward serving themselves. Indeed, I have never taken the word "Father" to be a compliment or an honorific, but rather as a reminder of the service that I am called to render to my parishioners. I am supposed to be a father to them, to teach them, to guide them and to lead them to Christ. And just like with my real children, that means service. I have spent many days and nights changing diapers, cooking meals, cleaning up after and comforting sick children. Now I am called to do the same (but usually more spiritual analogs) at church. I find being called Father to be humbling, rather than a source of pride.
 
Upvote 0

~Anastasia~

† Handmaid of God †
Dec 1, 2013
31,133
17,455
Florida panhandle, USA
✟922,775.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Thank you very informative friend and well said thank you ! Ill think on the words you spoke and if I think of more ill send them your way if you don't mind

May the Holy Spirit guide us and not the flesh!

If it could help then I am glad. Feel free to ask further, and I'm sure one of us can help you. This forum has always been so helpful to me.

And indeed, may we seek to follow God and not be led astray in the flesh!

God be with you. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArmyMatt
Upvote 0

Gregory95

You will know them by their fruits
Jan 15, 2019
859
289
29
missouri
✟37,762.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If it could help then I am glad. Feel free to ask further, and I'm sure one of us can help you. This forum has always been so helpful to me.

And indeed, may we seek to follow God and not be led astray in the flesh!

God be with you. :)
I was thinking on the clothing of those who are priests and such

Is their clothing mean anything in particular like he is bishop he is deacon etc

If so can you help me understand why because when I read on Christ calling out scribes and pharisees on their cloths that sets them apart because it gave them a sense of superiority

Although I'm not saying this is why the orthodox are

I can't help but think it would be beneficial if they dressed as the normal is where they live granted its not immodest of anything like that
 
Upvote 0

~Anastasia~

† Handmaid of God †
Dec 1, 2013
31,133
17,455
Florida panhandle, USA
✟922,775.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
I was thinking on the clothing of those who are priests and such

Is their clothing mean anything in particular like he is bishop he is deacon etc

If so can you help me understand why because when I read on Christ calling out scribes and pharisees on their cloths that sets them apart because it gave them a sense of superiority

Although I'm not saying this is why the orthodox are

I can't help but think it would be beneficial if they dressed as the normal is where they live granted its not immodest of anything like that

A small book could probably be written on this. :)

I looked for articles to share with you, but to be honest, each one I looked at had good points but also something not quite the way I would say it and potentially misleading/confusing to outsiders.

Yes, priests do wear special clothing (vestments) during services. This goes back to the priesthood in the OT. Like everything else in the Church, each thing has deep meaning (often in layers). The colors worn in different seasons -- for Nativity (usually red), Lent (purple), Resurrection (white/gold), and so on. The pieces also have meaning, and the priest says certain prayers when he puts them on. The epitrachion (a long wide strip worn around the neck) for example identifies him as a priest. I read it used to be made of wool to symbolize his responsibility to the "sheep", and is the very basic garment that might be worn as a "minimum" over the simple robe (plain black representing service or death to the world or plain white representing his own baptism) when performing an actual priestly role. It is worn differently for each degree within the Church, so that you can identify priests, deacons, bishops, etc.

The priest wears a full set of vestments during the Divine Liturgy. Our priest wears only his robe and epitrachion to do certain ministry for persons. When he's not actively in that role, all the elaborate vestments are set aside, and he wears either a black robe (cassock) or black slacks and shirt with a "dog collar". I've never known of a priest to actually wear liturgical vestments outside the context of Church - I think there are actual rules they are not supposed to when going out to meet people in general.

Priests are supposed to be generally identifiable as priests. I don't know how universally applicable in their lives that is supposed to be - I think only in public? There is a story that stayed with me from an Orthodox abbot (leader of a monastery - so a monk and ALWAYS in his cassock) and another minister/priest from a denomination I forgot. This abbot radiates Christ anyway. :) The two were walking together, and people would come up (even very unlikely-looking ones like "punk rockers") and greet the abbot and ask him to bless them or talk to him. He was a walking testimony and touched people constantly. The other priest/minister was used to walking around without any priestly garb at all and was struck by the effect the abbot had and commented on it.

I've known other monks who had this same effect. So I don't see it as parading around is rich clothing. Usually it's simple and black for these, and very effectI've (though their mannerism is certainly part of it).

That's just a start. But there is a LOT of meaning and prayers, etc. connected to what is worn in Church, and I think that's what you were asking. I can look for better articles, if you want. :)
 
Last edited:
  • Useful
Reactions: Gregory95
Upvote 0

☦Marius☦

Murican
Site Supporter
Jun 9, 2017
2,300
2,102
27
North Carolina (Charlotte)
✟268,123.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I was thinking on the clothing of those who are priests and such

Is their clothing mean anything in particular like he is bishop he is deacon etc

If so can you help me understand why because when I read on Christ calling out scribes and pharisees on their cloths that sets them apart because it gave them a sense of superiority

Although I'm not saying this is why the orthodox are

I can't help but think it would be beneficial if they dressed as the normal is where they live granted its not immodest of anything like that

Some of the priests garments come from the OT orders as Anastasia said above, but much also is influenced by the garb of what senators would wear in the Roman Empire. It was just common Dress back then, but seems over the top now I suppose.

Watch this and see if it helps, it goes into a brief explanation of liturgical garments and their symbolism

 
Upvote 0

☦Marius☦

Murican
Site Supporter
Jun 9, 2017
2,300
2,102
27
North Carolina (Charlotte)
✟268,123.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I mean though were can I find what exactly the oral tradition is I know of it but not what it says this is what I would like to find if you can refer me

Fr. Matt is correct, the early church fathers wrote much about the oral traditions that the apostle Paul commanded us to keep. Fear not :) they didn't just leave the church out wandering in the dark. The Apostles elected men they could trust, and these men wrote much and elected men they could trust, and they wrote much.
 
Upvote 0

Gregory95

You will know them by their fruits
Jan 15, 2019
859
289
29
missouri
✟37,762.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Fr. Matt is correct, the early church fathers wrote much about the oral traditions that the apostle Paul commanded us to keep. Fear not :) they didn't just leave the church out wandering in the dark. The Apostles elected men they could trust, and these men wrote much and elected men they could trust, and they wrote much.
Where can I find these writing my friend
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

~Anastasia~

† Handmaid of God †
Dec 1, 2013
31,133
17,455
Florida panhandle, USA
✟922,775.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,535
13,689
✟428,472.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
When you are more advanced in your understanding of the Fathers, there are also further resources like the 'other' material on Tertullian.org (the stuff that didn't make it into the ante-Nicene and Nicene fathers collections, for various reasons). This stuff can be tricky because some of the personages are obscure and/or heretical (e.g., I think there's a translation of Nestorius' Bazaar in there, if I recall correctly), but it's still useful for the stuff like HH St. Cyril's commentaries, the letters of HH St. Dionysius to the Roman Popes Stephen and Xystus, and so on. Definitely go to places like CCEL first, though, because that's the more standard stuff befitting someone who is just starting out and might not know how to tell who is of what party, who is to be avoided, etc.
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
41,540
20,059
41
Earth
✟1,462,771.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
When you are more advanced in your understanding of the Fathers, there are also further resources like the 'other' material on Tertullian.org (the stuff that didn't make it into the ante-Nicene and Nicene fathers collections, for various reasons). This stuff can be tricky because some of the personages are obscure and/or heretical (e.g., I think there's a translation of Nestorius' Bazaar in there, if I recall correctly), but it's still useful for the stuff like HH St. Cyril's commentaries, the letters of HH St. Dionysius to the Roman Popes Stephen and Xystus, and so on. Definitely go to places like CCEL first, though, because that's the more standard stuff befitting someone who is just starting out and might not know how to tell who is of what party, who is to be avoided, etc.

good call. that site also has, more specifically, some of the early apologists not in the ANF, such as St Aristides' Confession.
 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,535
13,689
✟428,472.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Yes, those too. It's one of my favorite websites.

There is also what amounts to a very easily searchable version of the CCEL material at Orthodox Church Fathers: Christian Theology Classics Search Engine, which I imagine would also be useful once you've got a hang of what you're reading there and are looking for the citation of a specific phrase within a given work. I've used it a bit when I have those "tip of the tongue" moments regarding a given quote or father, and want to make sure I'm not attributing to HH St. Cyril of Alexandria something that was actually written by HH St. Cyril of Jerusalem or something like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArmyMatt
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,535
13,689
✟428,472.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
The website Early Christian Writings can also be useful to the properly disposed, I believe. One thing I like about it that I haven't seen in other collections is that in addition to having a lot of early writings, it organizes patristic references by chapter and verse , so that you can see here's what father X said about verse X, for those times when people might present you with a specific verse. For instance, here's the page as it appears regarding the Gospel of John. You can see "Patristic references" under the 'Resources' heading, though just like with Tertullian.org (or really any site, for that matter), you have to be on your guard for who exactly they're counting as fathers. (I don't use this site as often as others, so I don't remember if there is too much to gripe about on that account, but I have noticed that a lot of websites will include as Fathers people like Origen and others who were condemned by the Church in their day or subsequently, so y'know...treat every reference carefully and be sure to bring up any questions you have with people who are knowledgeable within whatever tradition you're looking at.)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

FenderTL5

Κύριε, ἐλέησον.
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2016
5,084
5,960
Nashville TN
✟634,153.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
...There is a story that stayed with me from an Orthodox abbot (leader of a monastery - so a monk and ALWAYS in his cassock) and another minister/priest from a denomination I forgot. This abbot radiates Christ anyway. :) The two were walking together, and people would come up (even very unlikely-looking ones like "punk rockers") and greet the abbot and ask him to bless them or talk to him. He was a walking testimony and touched people constantly. The other priest/minister was used to walking around without any priestly garb at all and was struck by the effect the abbot had and commented on it.

I've known other monks who had this same effect...

The story is by Abbot Tryphon and it's a beautiful story. Here it is in his own words.
 
Upvote 0

Rosie Q

Active Member
Jun 2, 2019
48
14
the Mountains
✟16,317.00
Country
Sierra Leone
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
I've never known a Baptist who believed all Lutherans and Pentecostals were going to Hell. I have known quite a few who believed Catholics and Orthodox were.

Sure we disagree on a large number of details, but so do Baptists, Presbyterians, Lutherans, Calvinists, Reformed, and so on. In fact, Baptists alone disagree with other Baptists on a ton of issues. Exactly what belief are Orthodox and Catholics perceived to hold that makes us all damnable then?

I don't think it's about beliefs, really. Now, I'd stay out of any place where people try and identify others as destined for hell. I know of such Christians, but I don't know any. The kinds of Protestantisms I have felt most at home in are versions where the interest in, and the influx of ideas and practices from the historical churches is a major inspiration ...

But, I think your question is unfortunately worded. Maybe one shouldn't ask "what is it about us (Orthodox and Catholics)" but rather "what is it about them (Protestants)". Why do they think that way?

The Orthodox probably mostly think that the major division is between East and West. But for Protestants, the major division is between Protestants and historical churches.

I don't really think the issue is specific beliefs. It's about kinship. We (Protestants)a family. Sometimes family is the worst (the Hugenott wars) but we have plenty in common. The so called historical churches are more or less alien to us. They are easy to point out as that other group, those that are different.

For instance, Protestantism is mostly about what's in your head, while the historical churches also are practical, physical and visual. Maybe that's at the core, actually, of the differenthood that in some Protestants' eyes make Catholics and Orthodox The Other.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I don't really think the issue is specific beliefs. It's about kinship. We (Protestants)a family. Sometimes family is the worst (the Hugenott wars) but we have plenty in common. The so called historical churches are more or less alien to us. They are easy to point out as that other group, those that are different.

For instance, Protestantism is mostly about what's in your head, while the historical churches also are practical, physical and visual. Maybe that's at the core, actually, of the differenthood that in some Protestants' eyes make Catholics and Orthodox The Other.
Reading your thoughtful comments here, I am inclined to think the answer really depends on which Protestants (and which churches) are being discussed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rosie Q
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Rosie Q

Active Member
Jun 2, 2019
48
14
the Mountains
✟16,317.00
Country
Sierra Leone
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Reading your thoughtful comments here, I am inclined to think the answer really depends on which Protestants (and which churches) are being discussed.

It could well be so. I don't know these churches from the inside, that proudly label others as heretics who will go to hell.

But all the way from the Council of Chalcedon in 451, stuff that really was more about politics have been dressed in the clothes of theological differences. Today Eastern and Oriental Orthodox agree that the condemnation at that Council mostly depend on misunderstandings because of language problems plus political interests. Those ghastly "monophysites" don't exist. It was all largely misunderstanding, and slightly different ways of phrasing highly related concepts.

I'd like to remind that many Orthodox still don't accept Protestant baptism, but baptise those who convert. And before the Second Vatican Council, the Catholics considered us all heretics. *shrug*
 
Upvote 0