I have heard that the book of Daniel was written in two parts meaning that Daniel wrote his story and then someone else wrote the rest. I believe that Daniel wrote the whole book but I am wondering now.
I haven't checked into authorship (many times we do know the answers to questions) ... but I do know that some parts of Daniel don't appear in Bibles translated from the late Masoretic text instead of the older Septuagint.I have heard that the book of Daniel was written in two parts meaning that Daniel wrote his story and then someone else wrote the rest. I believe that Daniel wrote the whole book but I am wondering now.
The authorship as separate persons was meant to ‘prove' that the prophesies of the ruling nations weren’t prophesy at all but hindsight from a later date.I have heard that the book of Daniel was written in two parts meaning that Daniel wrote his story and then someone else wrote the rest. I believe that Daniel wrote the whole book but I am wondering now.
I have heard that the book of Daniel was written in two parts meaning that Daniel wrote his story and then someone else wrote the rest. I believe that Daniel wrote the whole book but I am wondering now.
It was all written by Daniel. In the same way the four gospels have the words of others that they included, namely Jesus, its the same way Daniel can include words by others. Because it might be written in first person, it does not mean somebody else wrote it.I have heard that the book of Daniel was written in two parts meaning that Daniel wrote his story and then someone else wrote the rest. I believe that Daniel wrote the whole book but I am wondering now.