- Jul 30, 2004
- 4,620
- 982
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Oh, yeah - They squeeze the life out of you though.It wouldn't do any good -- anacondas aren't venomous.
Sharia law is the fundamental structure of their religion. There is no separation of church and state. They firmly believe in an order of governing with no place for democracy, Allah, Law, Imam, clergy, man, woman.
Their history is one of occupy, increase your numbers and conversion by force. In 30 years, Europe will be overwhelmed by their numbers. A culture can sustain itself if they duplicate themselves. I think Europe is procreating at about 1.6 children per family. Muslims 6-8 kids. They will dominate just by numbers alone and of course, their laws are being changed already to accommodate them.
This is not paranoia, it's a movement taking place.
[Edited material from "Is Sharia Law Compatible with Democracy?", by Michael Curtis, Professor Emeritus of Rutgers University]
“John Adams writes, ‘Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.’
Noah Webster stated, "The moral principles and precepts contained in the scriptures ought to form the basis of all our civil constitutions and laws. All the miseries and evils which men suffer from vice, crime, ambition, injustice, oppression, slavery, and war, proceed from their despising or neglecting the precepts contained in the Bible."
Delegate Governor Morris of Pennsylvania forthrightly professed, "I believe that religion is the only solid base of morals, and that morals are the only possible support of free governments. Therefore education should teach the precepts of religion and the duties of man towards God."
Americans of that era actually held to the Christian faith, yet they held to the commonly accepted morals, ethics and standards of behavior derived from English Common Law, which drew from biblical law given to the Hebrews by God.
The rule of law laid out in the Constitution descends from the Ten Commandments.
Both Leviticus 19:34 and Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution require uniform treatment of immigrants. Deuteronomy 17:15 warns the Hebrews not to let a foreigner rule over them just as the Constitution requires the president to be a natural born citizen of the U.S.
The requirement in Article III Section 3 to establish guilt in cases of treason by the testimony of at least two witnesses recalls the biblical instruction in Deuteronomy 17:6 to have the testimony of two or three witnesses before putting a man to death.
A proposed amendment to the Constitution of Oklahoma, State Question 755, stating that, "The courts shall not look to the legal precepts of other nations or cultures. Specifically, the courts shall not consider international law or sharia law," was blocked by an order of U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange. Her decision was upheld by the Federal 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver on January 10, 2012.
Sharia law, which regulates all aspects of Muslim communal and private life, is discriminatory against women and children, denying them rights that have been won over the last two centuries in democratic countries…
It is difficult to envisage the compatibility of alternative legal systems with the law in democratic societies, particularly with an Islamic legal system that calls for the death penalty for apostasy, sexual "crimes" of women including adultery, and homosexuality.
Women are handicapped on issues of marriage, divorce, inheritance, and child custody. A Muslim man is permitted to have four wives and can divorce one of them with ease, but women must follow a difficult path to obtain a divorce. At the worst,women can be stoned to death for sex outside marriage. Judgment in criminal cases can be harsh; thieves may be punished by amputation…
The cases in Oklahoma and New Jersey have paved the way for an important decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the near future. Will it allow Muslim law to be used in civil cases relating to the Muslim community? Will the decisions of Sharia tribunals become legally binding? Or will the Supreme Court decide, as did the highest court in Britain, the Law Lords, when it ruled in a case involving a woman and custody of her child in 2008, that the Sharia law applied in that particular case was discriminatory and a violation of human rights?”
Oh, yeah - They squeeze the life out of you though.
Can't say. I've never met them.
No, I think his supporters are very pro-American. Probably don't care much one way or another about German nationalism.
Omar and AOC are anti-American, ant- Semitic, anti-Semitic Capitalism, anti-Constitution, antichrists.
Trump did not agree with the "send her back" chant, but nobody would miss her. In many of the original state constitutions, they required that you be a Christian to hold any office. I do not believe a Muslim should be representing our country in any political office or judge for that matter. It conflicts with our laws. They want Sharia Law and eventually that become a the issue. Examine European counties laws and how they've changed to accommodate Muslims and their religion.
I haven't ordered Trump to leave the office and the country but I certainly would advise people not to vote for him in 2020 if he chooses to stand. I'm disappointed (but not surprised) you don't understand the difference.
It's a big decision for all of us. Do we want the US to be a great country striving to live up to our American values? Or do we want it to be an isolationist theocratic backwater?This is really about 2020 then, right? The chance of Trump not getting reelected though, I would say are around zero. When Obama was President there were still a lot of people in this country that didn't like the idea, nor maybe even liked Obama personally, the same way many American's don't care care for Trump personally. It still didn't prevent him from getting reelected. The same is going to be true in Trump's case.
Will you be around to admit you're wrong if Trump is not re-elected. Big talk is easy when you are not accountableThis is really about 2020 then, right? The chance of Trump not getting reelected though, I would say are around zero. When Obama was President there were still a lot of people in this country that didn't like the idea, nor maybe even liked Obama personally, the same way many American's don't care care for Trump personally. It still didn't prevent him from getting reelected. The same is going to be true in Trump's case.
I do fear that could happen. That's why I vote against Democrats and Socialists.A dictatorship in the US, sharp increase in racist attacks.
Or will the Supreme Court decide, as did the highest court in Britain, the Law Lords, when it ruled in a case involving a woman and custody of her child in 2008, that the Sharia law applied in that particular case was discriminatory and a violation of human rights?”
I'm guessing no one's ever told you to go back where you came from and then called where came from a "complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world, if they have a functioning government at all."
It certainly wasn't spontaneous.Even this is proven to be a lie from Trump. We now know that the 'send her back' chant that Trump is claiming to disavow was planned at the rally and rehearsed with the crowd by warm-up act Lara Trump.
Scotland doesn't want him or his nature destroying golf courses.Some of Trumps ideologies are anti-American. Can we tell him to go bank where he came from?