Status
Not open for further replies.

DanishLutheran

Well-Known Member
Dec 22, 2018
404
184
41
Aarhus
✟25,867.00
Country
Denmark
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Except I'm the victor. :liturgy::priest:

giphy.webp
 
Upvote 0

Not David

I'm back!
Apr 6, 2018
7,356
5,235
25
USA
✟231,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Religious one are really secularized. Not, spiritual.

Religion is Satan's counterfeit system. Many think that Christianity is a religion. True spirituality in the Holy Spirit in communion with the Father through Christ is Christianity.

Religion will devise and use the Bible to create concepts and programs to live by, as a good boy scout will do in pursuit of merit badges.
Ok, this is getting nonsensical now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Augustus_33AD
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,242.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
How does one body affect the point?

Does your hand address your mouth with a title before it will put in food? Will your mouth look down upon the hand after it takes in the nourishment needed to energize the hand? While not realizing the hand is also supplying nourishment for the mouth's own use?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,565
13,723
✟429,802.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
I'm not sure what to make of these posts from our Protestant friends like Genez and others. They don't seem to make a lot of sense. I asked about St. Peter's use of elevated language and got a response about not calling anyone "Father", even though that's not present in any of the salutations (though he does call Timothy "a beloved son"...hmmmmmm... :scratch:).

So what is there to say about that? I think we're having different conversations by this point.
 
Upvote 0

W2L

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2016
20,081
10,988
USA
✟213,573.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I'm not sure what to make of these posts from our Protestant friends like Genez and others. They don't seem to make a lot of sense. I asked about St. Peter's use of elevated language and got a response about not calling anyone "Father", even though that's not present in any of the salutations (though he does call Timothy "a beloved son"...hmmmmmm... :scratch:).

So what is there to say about that? I think we're having different conversations by this point.
Sorry missed it. Whats the scripture?
 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,565
13,723
✟429,802.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
The salutation from his second epistle to his disciple St. Timothy. I chose from that, his epistle to the Romans, and his first epistle from the Corinthians, though the same point would apply to any of his canonical epistles, and really the entire Bible. That's the point: this is so well established, by what rationale do we reduce it or otherwise not follow it in our interactions with our bishops today, as they are the successors to these very same people? (To St. Paul and the other apostles and disciples.)
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,242.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
If all these people clamoring for respect to be given by honoring their "title," were to show the same respect for dedicating their lives to constant study and growth in the Word of God? There would be no need for formalities.

Respect will be intuitive and earned. Not demanded. Only demanded when believers rebel and want to run contrary to the truth (not, merely rules and traditions = religion)

I have seen too many teachers who are superficial, but have an effect over the people who show a near superstitious religious deference to those whom have a title. But, the same people never being taught what is needed to be made strong and mature in Christ. That requires in-depth knowledge and understanding that these merely academically inclined religious men have no desire for. Its all become secularized. Satan feels secure when that is achieved. No threat to his domain when Christianity can be neutralized. Satan is the king of forming religions. True Christianity to him is like holding up a crucifix to a vampire. That is why he so carefully grooms men for teaching religion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Agree
Reactions: SaintNick
Upvote 0

W2L

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2016
20,081
10,988
USA
✟213,573.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The salutation from his second epistle to his disciple St. Timothy. I chose from that, his epistle to the Romans, and his first epistle from the Corinthians, though the same point would apply to any of his canonical epistles, and really the entire Bible. That's the point: this is so well established, by what rationale do we reduce it or otherwise not follow it in our interactions with our bishops today, as they are the successors to these very same people? (To St. Paul and the other apostles and disciples.)
I believe in exalting the word given us, not the speaker.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Not David

I'm back!
Apr 6, 2018
7,356
5,235
25
USA
✟231,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I'm not sure what to make of these posts from our Protestant friends like Genez and others. They don't seem to make a lot of sense. I asked about St. Peter's use of elevated language and got a response about not calling anyone "Father", even though that's not present in any of the salutations (though he does call Timothy "a beloved son"...hmmmmmm... :scratch:).

So what is there to say about that? I think we're having different conversations by this point.
It is because they try to change the topic or make strawmen out of arguments. All of this is a product of Neo-Protestant anti-clericalism and individualism inherited by non-Christian Western Culture.
 
Upvote 0

Not David

I'm back!
Apr 6, 2018
7,356
5,235
25
USA
✟231,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Does your hand address your mouth with a title before it will put in food? Will your mouth look down upon the hand after it takes in the nourishment needed to energize the hand? While not realizing the hand is also supplying nourishment for the mouth's own use?
I'm sure this could apply to the head yet we know why you won't apply that concept.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
If all these people clamouring for respect to be given by honoring their "title" were to show the same respect for dedicating their lives to constant study and growth in the Word of God?
There was no hint given about any clamoring for respect to be given to any title.

The same people who wouldn't address a bishop with at least the title of bishop don't hesitate to call their physician "Doctor," I am sure, nor do they think of that as giving into any "clamoring."
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,242.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I'm sure this could apply to the head yet we know why you won't apply that concept.
Christ is the head. He is our BRAIN...

He wants us to become one with Him. He was the Word made flesh. And? He is the Word of God found in John 1:1. How well we truly understand God's Word will reflect in how well we function in the body part we have been assigned.Many are paralyzed and crippled and do not know it.

When the body parts are malfunctioning? What happens?
 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,565
13,723
✟429,802.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
And yet His words are spirit and life

Yes; how could they not be, when He Himself is the Way, and the Truth, and the Life?

My point, in case it was not clear, is that to deny proper honor to those whom Christ has given the responsibility of shepherding His flock amounts to nothing less than an implicit denial of the incarnation itself. You exalt the book or the speech or the whatever as something separate from the presence of God in the man or men who have written it, canonized it, or spoken it, dividing the life-giving Word from His creation in the name of not exalting a man...all the while paradoxically recognizing that Christ is a man!

So, as Christ is incarnate as a man, blessing our nature in Himself by assuming it from the ever-virgin St. Mary the Theotokos (cf. St. Gregory Nazianzen: "That which is not assumed is not saved"), would it not make more sense to 'exalt' a man as being indwelt by the Holy Spirit (as Christ specifically told us would happen; Matthew 10:19-20), as our Lord's incarnation itself is what makes such an indwelling possible? Or are we going to pretend as though the incarnation only affected the Word of God Himself, and did not have any effect on the wider world or the people in it? Or maybe it only affected the world insofar as people in it may preach from a text that you recognize? (But would not have were it not for the work of great saints such HH St. Athanasius, St. Jerome, the fathers of the councils at Carthage that accepted HH St. Athansius' canon, etc.)

I'm sorry, but I cannot follow such a position that implicitly denies that our Lord, God, and Savior Jesus Christ became man by the power of the Holy Spirit and of the Virgin Mary. That's what the incarnation is. That's why we have a New Testament at all.
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,242.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Yes; how could they not be, when He Himself is the Way, and the Truth, and the Life?

My point, in case it was not clear, is that to deny proper honor to those whom Christ has given the responsibility of shepherding His flock amounts to nothing less than an implicit denial of the incarnation itself.


How highly you exalt yourself. Prove your responsibility by how well you feed (teach) your flock.

Anyone (with some teaching ability) can teach something.

Very few know how, and what to teach.
 
Upvote 0

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
4,398
5,097
New Jersey
✟335,953.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Its likely i would share the Gospel of Jesus with them calling on them to repent... I do so without respect of persons.
Do you share the Gospel with all clergy, or is this a jab at Orthodox clergy in particular? Most members of the clergy know the Gospel quite well already.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,242.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Do you share the Gospel with all clergy, or is this a jab at Orthodox clergy in particular? Most members of the clergy know the Gospel quite well already.
Billy Graham had led ministers to the Lord. Wake up. Religion has become a business.

One would think those child molesting priests have yet to have the Holy Spirit enter them in regeneration. Religion sets a scene for learning the program and getting a job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SaintNick
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.