Ok, this is getting nonsensical now.Religious one are really secularized. Not, spiritual.
Religion is Satan's counterfeit system. Many think that Christianity is a religion. True spirituality in the Holy Spirit in communion with the Father through Christ is Christianity.
Religion will devise and use the Bible to create concepts and programs to live by, as a good boy scout will do in pursuit of merit badges.
How does one body affect the point?
Sorry missed it. Whats the scripture?I'm not sure what to make of these posts from our Protestant friends like Genez and others. They don't seem to make a lot of sense. I asked about St. Peter's use of elevated language and got a response about not calling anyone "Father", even though that's not present in any of the salutations (though he does call Timothy "a beloved son"...hmmmmmm... ).
So what is there to say about that? I think we're having different conversations by this point.
I believe in exalting the word given us, not the speaker.The salutation from his second epistle to his disciple St. Timothy. I chose from that, his epistle to the Romans, and his first epistle from the Corinthians, though the same point would apply to any of his canonical epistles, and really the entire Bible. That's the point: this is so well established, by what rationale do we reduce it or otherwise not follow it in our interactions with our bishops today, as they are the successors to these very same people? (To St. Paul and the other apostles and disciples.)
It is because they try to change the topic or make strawmen out of arguments. All of this is a product of Neo-Protestant anti-clericalism and individualism inherited by non-Christian Western Culture.I'm not sure what to make of these posts from our Protestant friends like Genez and others. They don't seem to make a lot of sense. I asked about St. Peter's use of elevated language and got a response about not calling anyone "Father", even though that's not present in any of the salutations (though he does call Timothy "a beloved son"...hmmmmmm... ).
So what is there to say about that? I think we're having different conversations by this point.
I'm sure this could apply to the head yet we know why you won't apply that concept.Does your hand address your mouth with a title before it will put in food? Will your mouth look down upon the hand after it takes in the nourishment needed to energize the hand? While not realizing the hand is also supplying nourishment for the mouth's own use?
There was no hint given about any clamoring for respect to be given to any title.If all these people clamouring for respect to be given by honoring their "title" were to show the same respect for dedicating their lives to constant study and growth in the Word of God?
Christ is the head. He is our BRAIN...I'm sure this could apply to the head yet we know why you won't apply that concept.
And yet His words are spirit and life
Yes; how could they not be, when He Himself is the Way, and the Truth, and the Life?
My point, in case it was not clear, is that to deny proper honor to those whom Christ has given the responsibility of shepherding His flock amounts to nothing less than an implicit denial of the incarnation itself.
Do you share the Gospel with all clergy, or is this a jab at Orthodox clergy in particular? Most members of the clergy know the Gospel quite well already.Its likely i would share the Gospel of Jesus with them calling on them to repent... I do so without respect of persons.
Billy Graham had led ministers to the Lord. Wake up. Religion has become a business.Do you share the Gospel with all clergy, or is this a jab at Orthodox clergy in particular? Most members of the clergy know the Gospel quite well already.