How do you balance living in a violent world with the teachings of Christ? For starters, I believe God is the same God of war as always. But the role of believers is different in the New Covenant. That is, we love our enemies, turn the other cheek when attacked. We do not resist violence but abandon it to the Lord who says vengeance belongs to him.
So I do not serve in the military or become a police officer whose life depends on doing the opposite of these. If an intruder tries to kill me or my family, I would rather we die upholding Jesus’ words than disobey only to suffer death from old age. Any alternative views on this?
Yeah, though I haven't read the rest of the thread, so forgive me if someone else already pointed this out:
You're not a martyr just because you're a Christian and you're killed, so it would not be a good plan to let yourself and your family die at the hands of an intruder. Martyrs are killed for their faith, not for their possessions, so unless the intruder breaks in and says "Renounce Jesus or I'll kill you" or something, it'd be hard to imagine him killing you because of your religious identity. This
definitely happens in other countries, but not so much in the United States, where the OP is based.
So that's a misguided view, to me. And the long tradition of warrior/soldier saints (St. Mina, St. George, St. Theodore of Shotep/Amir Tadros/Theodore Stratelates, etc.) shows that it has been accepted from a very early time that Christians may serve in the army, and, yes, even kill people in that role. It is not
advisable that they should do so, but it is understood that
it may happen. Canon 13 of the Basilian canons (4th century; notably, the first 13 are shared by the Egyptians and the Greeks in Egypt, pointing to a likely common origin in the saint's own writings) puts it this way:
Our fathers did not consider killings committed in the course of wars to be classifiable as murders at all, on the score, it seems to me, of allowing a pardon to men fighting in defense of sobriety and piety. Perhaps, though, it might be advisable to refuse them communion for three years, on the ground that their hands are not clean.
So, it seems to me that fighting in war would be classified differently -- it's not the same as 'regular' murder, and yet the one who participates in it likely has blood on their hands, and hence there is the ecclesiatical penalty as given, which I will assume stood at the time. (I don't know about its status today, since canons are to be interpreted by the Church which receives them, and I took this particular translation from
a larger piece on the topic of Christians and war on some kind of Eastern Orthodox website that seems to be overall advocating pacifism, though I am not Eastern Orthodox myself, so it's not my place to judge that either way.)
I believe, following this (since we share the same canon with the Greeks on this), that there may be some circumstances in which a Christian is allowed to engage in violence for some limited aim (I agree with the overall point of the piece that the only legitimate use of violence is in protecting the innocent and weak from harm), though my particular Church has never developed this stance into anything as advanced and complicated at the western/Catholic "Just War" theory. For the majority of the Church's existence in Egypt this would've been a moot point anyway, since Christians were not allowed to serve in the army of the Muslims, and the Muslim Arabs have been ruling Egypt for about 1,400 years now. Christians have allowed to serve in the army in Egypt for some time now (not exactly sure when the ban was lifted), but it's not an easy thing to do, and you could get killed for it:
Why Are Christian Soldiers in Egypt Harassed and Killed?
These men certainly are martyrs for their faith, even if the context in which they received their crowns is outwardly pretty deplorable (conscripts, trying to serve their country, shot dead by fanatical officers and then covered up as 'suicides' by the army). May their prayers be with us.