Molinism and you (Counter Perspective to Determinism)

Grip Docility

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2017
4,665
1,787
North America
✟85,825.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
It also means that He knows how His interactions will affect man's free will. So He creates in order to get the most out of His creation.

If it’s libertarian response, it’s not an alteration of man’s Free will, but God’s alteration of His approach. :). IMO
 
Upvote 0

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
6,834
3,410
✟244,837.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Ideas and perceptions expand and grow with time to ponder them. Is that a fair point?

Some do. It depends a great deal on the cultural and intellectual climate of the age in which an idea was given birth.

Molinism was probably one of the fastest maturing ideas in history. Luis de Molina published his Concordia in 1588, heavy theological debate ensued in the European universities, the Congregatio de Auxiliis concluded in 1607, and the theological system was largely mature by at least 1620. Even Bellarmine's Congruism, which built upon Molinism, was complete by 1613. I don't think Molinism has evolved much at all since that time.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: Grip Docility
Upvote 0

Hammster

Psalm 144:1
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,187
25,222
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,728,699.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
If it’s libertarian response, it’s not an alteration of man’s Free will, but God’s alteration of His approach. :). IMO
Exactly. And therein lies the problem.
 
Upvote 0

Grip Docility

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2017
4,665
1,787
North America
✟85,825.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Exactly. And therein lies the problem.

How so? Does not God Incarnating and Hebrews 2:14 show that God goes all out, motivated from Love, towards Creation?

John 3:16 ; 1 John 2:2
 
Upvote 0

HatGuy

Some guy in a hat
Jun 9, 2014
1,008
786
Visit site
✟123,338.00
Country
South Africa
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Open Theism states God doesn’t know the future. Molinism states God knows all futures. :)

That’s a pretty big difference, right?
It's not exactly true though. Open theists maintain that the future is a realm of possibilities, and God knows those possibilities. The future is "open" however because while God may know the endless possibilities, the future is not settled, meaning your choices are not exhaustively foreknown, only potentially foreknown. In this sense, God does not know the future because the future literally does not exist; it is not actualised until it comes to pass.

On the other hand, the way I'm seeing it, Molinism does claim the future is actualised - it already does exist. However, it was the best possible world to actualize based on God's endless knowledge of all possibilities.

However, as soon as you speak of a non-linear relationship, it seems to me you are speaking in terms open theists would use. Under Molinism, how is the relationship non linear? Given that time is still linear on Molinism, as God perceived all possibilities logically before creation and actualized the best possible outcome (under Molinism) this would still imply that the future is as linear as the past and is, in actuality, determined.

Based on those use of words and your explanation, you seem to me to not be Molinist, even though you think you are. I could be wrong though, so not making claims on your position, just observations.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: zippy2006
Upvote 0

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
6,834
3,410
✟244,837.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
It's not exactly true though. Open theists maintain that the future is a realm of possibilities, and God knows those possibilities. The future is "open" however because while God may know the endless possibilities, the future is not settled, meaning your choices are not exhaustively foreknown, only potentially foreknown. In this sense, God does not know the future because the future literally does not exist; it is not actualised until it comes to pass.

On the other hand, the way I'm seeing it, Molinism does claim the future is actualised - it already does exist. However, it was the best possible world to actualize based on God's endless knowledge of all possibilities.

However, as soon as you speak of a non-linear relationship, it seems to me you are speaking in terms open theists would use. Under Molinism, how is the relationship non linear? Given that time is still linear on Molinism, as God perceived all possibilities logically before creation and actualized the best possible outcome (under Molinism) this would still imply that the future is as linear as the past and is, in actuality, determined.

Based on those use of words and your explanation, you seem to me to not be Molinist, even though you think you are. I could be wrong though, so not making claims on your position, just observations.

He opposes determinism in the sense that "Tampers with libertarian free will." On Molinism creation is shaped not solely by God's sovereign will, but also by the free will of God's creatures. It is generally accurate to say that if LFW is present, determinism is not.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Grip Docility
Upvote 0

HatGuy

Some guy in a hat
Jun 9, 2014
1,008
786
Visit site
✟123,338.00
Country
South Africa
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
He opposes determinism in the sense that "Tampers with libertarian free will." On Molinism creation is shaped not solely by God's sovereign will, but also by the free will of God's creatures. It is generally accurate to say that if LFW is present, determinism is not.
Ok, got it. Thanks! I'll keep that in mind.

Although I did think that Molinism attempts to bring LFW and determinism together. At least the kind of determinism that doesn't claim God as cause for everything. But if the future is settled, I'm struggling to understand how it is not determined in at least some sense.

P.S. I'm not defending Open Theism here, just making observations.
 
Upvote 0

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
6,834
3,410
✟244,837.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Ok, got it. Thanks! I'll keep that in mind.

Although I did think that Molinism attempts to bring LFW and determinism together. At least the kind of determinism that doesn't claim God as cause for everything. But if the future is settled, I'm struggling to understand how it is not determined in at least some sense.

P.S. I'm not defending Open Theism here, just making observations.

In my opinion--and I want to be clear that I am no longer speaking for Grip--Molinism does include a kind of "determinism" that Open Theism does not. On Molinism God has foreknowledge of future events; on Open Theism He does not. It would probably be better to say that Molinism includes a "closed future," since determinism is always a form of causal determinism.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

HatGuy

Some guy in a hat
Jun 9, 2014
1,008
786
Visit site
✟123,338.00
Country
South Africa
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In my opinion--and I want to be clear that I am no longer speaking for Grip--Molinism does include a kind of "determinism" that Open Theism does not. On Molinism God has foreknowledge of future events; on Open Theism He does not. It would probably be better to say that Molinism includes a "closed future," since determinism is always a form of causal determinism.
Yes, I think so too.

Although, again, under open theism God has foreknowledge of all possible futures, but since the future is not actualized, it does not exist.

I'm reiterating this because I think open theists get criticized for saying God doesn't know everything, which is untrue. They simply say God knows all there is to know - and the future is unknowable because it is not determined nor actualized.

I think your suggestion of the phrase "closed future" is very helpful.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hammster

Psalm 144:1
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,187
25,222
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,728,699.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
How so? Does not God Incarnating and Hebrews 2:14 show that God goes all out, motivated from Love, towards Creation?

John 3:16 ; 1 John 2:2
The problem with Molinism is that it’s not love for His creation, it’s love for results. So it’s possible that someone who will not be saved in this universe would be saved in another, had God chose to create that one.
 
Upvote 0

Grip Docility

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2017
4,665
1,787
North America
✟85,825.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The problem with Molinism is that it’s not love for His creation, it’s love for results. So it’s possible that someone who will not be saved in this universe would be saved in another, had God chose to create that one.

Under normal human intercession, you would be correct, but with God, IMO, All things are possible. :)

We’re talking about God’s intercessory response to libertarian free Will that He Willed.

All I’m asking is that this is actually considered from the perspective of God’s ability, vice mans. :)
 
Upvote 0

Grip Docility

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2017
4,665
1,787
North America
✟85,825.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Yes, I think so too.

Although, again, under open theism God has foreknowledge of all possible futures, but since the future is not actualized, it does not exist.

I'm reiterating this because I think open theists get criticized for saying God doesn't know everything, which is untrue. They simply say God knows all there is to know - and the future is unknowable because it is not determined nor actualized.

I think your suggestion of the phrase "closed future" is very helpful.

This is correct. God indeed “Knows” the Actualized future, in Molinism. Because God responds (Mankind’s Perspective) ... Responded (God’s Perspective) to Creations Libertarian Free Will via God’s Divine intercession (Not Determination)(With Middle Knowledge) in the way that recognizes the maximum Gospel Response potential of every living soul of all Actualized, Finalized Creation.

This makes The Actualized sum of all, contingent on Creation and Creator resulted collaboration of God’s Loving Sovereignty geared towards a Relationship Of Love, Versus the Sovereign “Determination” Of God.

Put simply...

In Molinism, God knows the Relationship based Actualized Future.

In Determinism, God Determined the Future.

The ending theological ramifications are enormously different.

IMO
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Grip Docility

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2017
4,665
1,787
North America
✟85,825.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
In my opinion--and I want to be clear that I am no longer speaking for Grip--Molinism does include a kind of "determinism" that Open Theism does not. On Molinism God has foreknowledge of future events; on Open Theism He does not. It would probably be better to say that Molinism includes a "closed future," since determinism is always a form of causal determinism.

Your use of Actualization is the superior term when referring to Molinism, as your earlier post correctly specified that the presence of Creations genuine Libertarian Free Will denotes the utter absence of “Determination”.
 
Upvote 0

Grip Docility

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2017
4,665
1,787
North America
✟85,825.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Molinism is the explanation for the process of God Actualizing Creation, by Relationally Responding to Creations God Given Libertarian Free Will, with His Multi-Dimensional Omniscience that includes Middle-Knowledge which denotes Multi-Dimensional Omniscience... in such a fashion that Creation is Actualized, instead of being Determined.

Molinism is a “closed future” theology, in that it acknowledges God’s Supreme Multi Dimensional Omniscience, That Knows All things far beyond our comprehension.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hammster

Psalm 144:1
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,187
25,222
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,728,699.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Under normal human intercession, you would be correct, but with God, IMO, All things are possible. :)

We’re talking about God’s intercessory response to libertarian free Will that He Willed.

All I’m asking is that this is actually considered from the perspective of God’s ability, vice mans. :)
I am looking at it from His ability through the lens of Molinism.

Let’s say that Bob comes to Christ because of Jerry who comes to Christ because of John. Now in the other universe, Jerry isn’t even in existence. So what about Bob? Is he even in existence? And if so, if he doesn’t know John, will he be saved?

There are too many changing variables in Molinism, especially if there is libertarian free will.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: Grip Docility
Upvote 0

Grip Docility

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2017
4,665
1,787
North America
✟85,825.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Upvote 0

Grip Docility

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2017
4,665
1,787
North America
✟85,825.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I am looking at it from His ability through the lens of Molinism.

Let’s say that Bob comes to Christ because of Jerry who comes to Christ because of John. Now in the other universe, Jerry isn’t even in existence. So what about Bob? Is he even in existence? And if so, if he doesn’t know John, will he be saved?

There are too many changing variables in Molinism, especially if there is libertarian free will.

I respect this train of thought but believe God can work with all things to ensure Bob and Jerry exist and come to salvation.

As for life, it speaks of too many changing variables that Only God could comprehend and navigate.

We’re talking about God’s infinite ability. :)
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Psalm 144:1
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,187
25,222
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,728,699.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
I respect this train of thought but believe God can work with all things to ensure Bob and Jerry exist and come to salvation.

As for life, it speaks of too many changing variables that Only God could comprehend and navigate.

We’re talking about God’s infinite ability. :)
If God can ensure that Bob and Jerry can come to salvation, why can’t He ensure that everyone does?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grip Docility
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Grip Docility

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2017
4,665
1,787
North America
✟85,825.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
If God can ensure that Bob and Jerry can come to salvation, why can’t He ensure that everyone does?

Libertarian Free Will

Some are wicked to the very core in exceedingly hateful and Blasphemous towards God ways that no matter what circumstances they are provided, they are indeed Exalters of the Creation over the Creator... or as Romans 1:30 calls those Temple Prostitution, Self exalting types... “Arrogant God Haters”. They relate to Satan, by choice, instead of Jesus Christ, in there very heart and will to do so, without refrain or repentance. They will have been given every possible chance to respond to 2 Peter 3:9 by the time their feet hit the lake of fire.

IMO
 
Upvote 0