It is, though. Learn to read.
Well, that would be wrong. It's a brick. A brick is not a drink. Stop me if I'm getting too technical.
Yeah, nice try, but no. I said the same
So let me ask again: if someone were to assault "gay rights activists" or other such groups the same way as you're applauding, would that be right
Who is excusing nazism?
but plenty of people pearl-clutching over antifa fail to be proportionally more concerned about the far greater threat the far right pose.
Yeah, because the "far right" (which to antifa and their supporters means "Anyone who doesn't think that mayonnaise is a gender") are certainly going about the exact same business. Yep.
Except no. There isn't the same wave of "far right" terrorist groups constantly threatening, harassing, assaulting and doxxing people as antifa is in the business of. A few have gone to extremes, and those people are going to pay for what they did. Hunt, and the guy from Charlottesville whose name I've thankfully forgotten come to mind.
But there's no comparison to the organized terroristic campaign of the far-left and its supporters, who keep doing what they're doing with impunity.
I don't either, as milkshaking isn't violence.
How convenient it must be to think you get to redefine words to suit your narrative.
Except no one who isn't already on your side is buying it.
You want to justify assaulting those who you don't agree with by claiming it isn't really assault because it doesn't live up to your arbitrary and convenient definitions. And you have repeatedly refused to answer a very basic question, which reveals very clearly that you know exactly what it is.