- Jun 26, 2015
- 26,402
- 15,493
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
What difference does it make? She believed the family stories and DNA proved she has American Indian markers.The Cherokee Nation described the DNA test as "useless," adding that there are legal requirements for tribal citizenship.
"Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong," Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin, Jr., said in a statement. "It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven. Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."
The Republican National Committee mocked Warren's disclosure, saying the test revealed only a "minuscule percentage" of Native American ancestry that still leaves unanswered questions.
The RNC also jumped on a correction from The Boston Globe. The paper originally reported that the probability of Warren's Native American ancestry ranges from 1/32 to 1/512, but now reports the low end of that range is actually 1/1,024.
My in-laws have traced both sides of the family. On grandma's side everyone is documented all the way back to the 1600's. The line that she is from goes back to a North Carolina Cherokee family member, he is buried in TN. We had a guy call from PA and his line was the same but from a different son of this native man. Is he on the Dawes Roll, not that I could find. But then not all of them were.
Upvote
0