Except the bible NEVER teaches that.
From another article in the same publication: (page 15)
Simple Substitutions
The assumptions of replacement theology are part and parcel of church teaching and the very warp and woof of Christian doctrine. The most obvious tenets of replacement theology are axiomatic:
■■ The New Testament replaces the Old Testament.
■■ The church replaces Israel.
■■ Christians replace Jews.
■■ The Lord’s Day (Sunday) replaces the Sabbath.
■■ The Lord’s Supper (Eucharist) replaces Passover.
Those are some of the obvious, surface-level substitutions propagated by replacement theology, but that’s just the beginning. Replacement theology completely subverts the Temple, the priesthood, and the Levitical worship system:
■■ The death of Jesus replaces the sacrifices.
■■ The body of Christ replaces the Temple.
■■ The Christian priesthood (or clergy) replaces the Levitical priesthood (non-Protestant).
■■ The priesthood of Jesus replaces the Levitical priesthood (Protestant).
Replacement theology also disregards the idea of a literal fulfillment of the prophecies about the restoration of the Jewish people in the land of Israel. In other words, there is no coming Messianic Era; the church is the Messianic Era. There is no future physical restoration of Israel because the church has replaced Israel, and therefore the prophecies about the coming kingdom are fulfilled in the church and, ultimately, in going to heaven:
■■ The promise of heaven replaces the promised land.
■■ Going to heaven replaces the kingdom of heaven (the Messianic Era).
■■ The church replaces the kingdom of heaven.
Replacement theology is all about “out with the old and in with the new.” It posits that all these old things were replaced when Jesus came and died and rose from the dead. The good news, the “gospel message,” according to replacement theology, is that God has replaced all the old systems with the new system. When stated as succinctly as that, it’s easy to sympathize with Jewish people who reject the gospel. Jews must surely think it puzzling that we would present the New Testament, which ostensibly replaces Judaism and all Jewish religious institutions and functions, as good news for Israel. Where’s the good news in the replacement-theology version of the good news? Israel has been replaced, the Torah has been canceled, and God’s covenant with the Jewish people is over. Adding insult to the injury, replacement theology posits that Jewish people’s relationship with God has been replaced by a new order and mechanism for salvation, thereby damning most Jews to eternity in hell. Is it really a mystery why most Jewish people are none too excited about this so-called good news?