Astrophile
Newbie
- Aug 30, 2013
- 2,280
- 1,525
- 76
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Widowed
You have none then, as expected. Ha. Lurkers...behold the religion!
It is not that scientists have nothing. On the contrary, it is more a matter of an embarras de richesses; it would be several hours work to explain even some of the evidence relating the compositions and kinematics of star systems to their ages, and in particular the evidence that Population II stars (including globular star clusters) are up to about 8 billion years older than the Sun and its planets. It would also be necessary to provide the evidence that the neutron-rich r-process elements (including platinum and gold) were produced either by supernovae or by neutron star mergers.
If one of the contributors to this forum were to explain this evidence to you, would you accept it or make any attempt to understand it? If not, then any such attempt would be a waste of time and effort.
Upvote
0