I constructed my comments quite clearly, simply, and in a manner easy for anyone who knows how to read to follow. That you have chosen to disregard what I said and race down the usual tangent is not my problem.
I would definitely argue you created quite the strawman.
The issue is not that this boy said something inappropriate and offensive. Despite the fact that:
1) Harvard indicated that he did.
2) Harvard rescinded his application because he did.
3) He admit that he did
4) He took some measure of ownership that he did.
So there is ALL this evidence that
he said that.
But I'm supposed to believe that the REAL issue is an attack by the left because and ONLY because:
1) Quotes "haven't been provided" (paraphrase)
2) "As it always is"; this is just "the left" doing what they always do. (I guess calling out racism is something that only the left does....wait.... that is actually a VERY astute point. I give you FULL credit for that. It's kinda too bad that the right never does it. Makes people think certain things). I'm sorry that you find the calling out of racism so offensive.
3) We haven't bothered to "Read into the claims".
I don't know how you interpret or meant to use the phrase "read into the claims", but one way of understanding that phrase is if you "try to create your own understanding of what was being said". The problem is that Harvard has made NO claim that Kyle hasn't admitted to. So if you read into a claim that has been admitted as fact, then any creation of understanding becomes yours and yours alone. Perhaps you don't like that someone is being held accountable by a private organization for expressing distasteful views but ultimately, there is no factual basis in your claim.
