I was made aware of the horrible things I said came out to the public. It's hilarious in its whole construction.Good point.
What did Kashuv actually say two years ago? Can anyone answer that question?
He wrote the n-word. A lot.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...e-sense/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.4485b4fc686a
The actual screenshots are easily found through google, but I'm not going to link them here.
He wrote the n-word. A lot.
Why should anyone link anything? If he didn't write any of it, he would said so. He knows what he wrote, that's why he's apologizing. Anyone else demanding otherwise is simply looking for a justifiable angle: "Unless you post the racist remarks here (in violation of this forum's rules), I will argue that there is no racism!"He wrote the n-word. A lot.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...e-sense/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.4485b4fc686a
The actual screenshots are easily found through google, but I'm not going to link them here.
Kashuv is not alone in viewing Harvard’s decision as a judgment against the possibility of redemption. Ben Shapiro, David Brooks, and Reason’s Robby Soave have all made the same point in recent days. But these people have it backward. Kashuv has a shot at redemption because Harvard revoked his acceptance. Consequences and redemption are not in tension. In fact, they go hand in hand.
To argue that we should not be judged for what we do in our teens is to argue that we shouldn’t have selective college admissions at all—a defensible position, but not one that any of these commentators hold. Past performance is the only tool we have to predict future performance. If, instead of using the N-word with his classmates in AP U.S. History, Kashuv had mouthed off to the teacher and gotten an F, he would never have gotten into Harvard in the first place, no matter how much he’d learned and changed since then. To have a chance of getting into Harvard as a freshman, you have to show that you used your last four years better than the competition used theirs. We now see that Kashuv did not use his time as well as the competition, so he can’t go to Harvard.
But Harvard is not saying who is or isn’t capable of change. It is saying that Kashuv hasn’t earned his redemption yet. If there’s any hope that he can become a better man, it will be through a path where he pays the inherent cost of his actions. If you act like a racist jerk, then the best organizations won’t want you around. Kashuv casting himself as the victim of an unforgiving and hypocritical society serves as sad proof that the growth he claims to have experienced hasn’t happened yet.
You link an article which contains a link to an article which contains a link to an article displaying twitter post made by someone named Shialee Grooman. Fantastic documentation.
Why should anyone link anything? If he didn't write any of it, he would said so. He knows what he wrote, that's why he's apologizing. Anyone else demanding otherwise is simply looking for a justifiable angle: "Unless you post the racist remarks here (in violation of this forum's rules), I will argue that there is no racism!"
Why should anyone link anything?
If he didn't write any of it, he would said so. He knows what he wrote, that's why he's apologizing.
Anyone else demanding otherwise is simply looking for a justifiable angle: "Unless you post the racist remarks here (in violation of this forum's rules), I will argue that there is no racism!"
The issue is not so limited in scope. If you had bothered to read into the claims, the true target here is not this kid from Parkland. He is just a sacrifice, offered up to the sheep to provide them something else to bleat about. The true target is Turning Point USA and by extension President Trump.
His life hasn't been ruined, he just doesn't get to go to his first choice school. I do feel that is appropriate. Actions have consequences. Every choice you make can open one door and close another.
He will still get a college education and no one will remember he was this kid in 4 years if he doesn't make a fool of himself again. That is also appropriate.
What the 2nd Chance crowd doesn't seem to get is his 2nd Chance will be admission at another university. Your 2nd Chance is never supposed to be to still get your wish come true after you blatantly choose to do wrong. This wasn't an accident or one time occurrence.
I must not be paying enough attention lately.
That is exactly correct.
If only everyone were willing to admit that actions have consequences in more situations than just this one.
What kind of ridiculous argument are Trump supporters trying to make in this thread?You link an article which contains a link to an article which contains a link to an article displaying twitter post made by someone named Shialee Grooman. Fantastic documentation.
However every article cited or linked or sub-linked is crafted in the same format, an attack on the organization Turning Point USA because Trump. Standard leftist fare.