I was hoping that a Republican, that I could vote for, would stand up and beat Trump in the primaries. Looks like they are all scared to try it,
How low, specifically, and how did those numbers compare to the results in the OP? I mean, "the polls are wrong! fake news!" is a great bit of spin but let's see how well it holds up against the facts.
Well, it is NOW. Like its slant or not, it once was a quality network. Now that it is under new ownership, the conservative moderators, hosts, anchors, etc. have apparently been told that they must feature liberals along with conservatives, and the result is a mish-mash of conflicting comments from politicians speaking over each other--often to the obvious distress of the moderators.
No, they were not. Only two, I think it was, out of a dozen or more had the winner correct. And those two were often ridiculed in the weeks leading up to election day. As for the fact that the electoral college chooses rather than the popular vote, most of the polls you are referring to had Hillary much further ahead in the popular vote than it turned out to be.
Clinton got more votes nationally than Trump did. Polls only measure popularity, not electoral votes.
