Just bear with me for a second.
Say something evolves. Then it has a child. Then that child dies, but resurrects twice. Then one of those two resurrections, dies.
In your opinion, the original Evolution is no different, from the remaining resurrection? It just detoured into resurrection, for no reason?
But then say the original Evolution died, then the remaining resurrection is the most evolved after all?
You see how this sort of just jumps all over the place, as to what has the most potential?
Say the remaining resurrection, resurrects into a species - is the species going to evolve because it started with an Evolution, even though the Evolution is gone? And the resurrection remains? Or does it have less reason to evolve, because the species as a whole has less reason to evolve, relative to the Evolution?
You see its sort of pointless comparing things that have or have not evolved?
What if something resurrected with greater and greater potential, would you believe it? At what point? How many times would something have to resurrect the more evolved, for you to see faith in the One behind that "Evolution"?
