There were two sets of stone tablets, if you read my post. Moses destroyed the first set in his anger.Are you trying to say that the two tablets do not both contain the Ten Commandments? And one was done away, and the other stands? I'm not sure what you are getting at, obviously.
[ Adam (אדם) literally means "red", and there is an etymological connection between adam and adamah, adamah designating "red clay" or "red ground" in a non-theological context.[7] In traditional Jewish theology, a strong etymological connection between the two words is often assumed. Maimonides believed the word adam to be derived from the word adamah, analogous to the way in which mankind was created from the ground.[8] In contemporary biblical scholarship there is a general consensus that the words have an etymological relationship, but the exact nature of it is disputed. The word adam has no feminine form in Hebrew, but if it did, it would be adamah.[6] However, it is considered unlikely that the word adamah is a feminization of "adam", and the prevailing hypothesis is that both words originate from the verbal stem "adam" (to be red) and were chosen by the author of Genesis to convey the relationship between man and the adamah.[7][9]
There is additional relationship between the words adam and adamah and the word dam (דם), meaning blood.[10] This justifies the presence in the Kashrut of the prohibition of the consumption of blood: the blood of a slaughtered animal must be returned to the ground, and covered with earth. ]
The hebrew is bolded for emphasis;
Romans 9:21 Does not the potter have the right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special occasions and another for common use?
וְק֥וֹץ וְדַרְדַּ֖ר תַּצְמִ֣יחַֽ לָ֑ךְ וְאָכַלְתָּ֖ אֶת־עֵ֥שֶׂב הַשָּׂדֶֽה׃
Thorns and thistles shall it sprout for you. But your food shall be the grasses of the field;
19
בְּזֵעַ֤ת אַפֶּ֙יךָ֙ תֹּ֣אכַל לֶ֔חֶם עַ֤ד שֽׁוּבְךָ֙ אֶל־הָ֣אֲדָמָ֔ה כִּ֥י מִמֶּ֖נָּה לֻקָּ֑חְתָּ כִּֽי־עָפָ֣ר אַ֔תָּה וְאֶל־עָפָ֖ר תָּשֽׁוּב׃
By the sweat of your brow Shall you get bread to eat, Until you return to the ground— For from it you were taken. For dust you are, And to dust you shall return.”
thorns and thistles
You will recognize them by their fruit. Can people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? 17 Likewise, every healthy tree produces good fruit, but a poor tree produces bad fruit. 18 A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, or a poor tree good fruit. 19 Any tree that does not produce good fruit is cut down and thrown in the fire! 20 So you will recognize them by their fruit.
Lineage',I already know all of that. I was asking why you called "adamah" a Jew...
No,You do realize Judaism is a religion that rejects Jesus Christ as the Messiah, right.
Judaism is a man made religion consisting of the law of Moses and the traditions (teachings) of man.
We know Paul lived as a Pharisee or among Pharisees. Pharisees believed in the resurrection of the dead.Also
Paul said “I lived (past tense)
Acts 26:5. Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee.”
Lineage',
Yayr(luke 3
Which is also why I will not speak ill of my inheritance as some have been taught to do.
While some trample a Holy inheritance of promised hope Fullfilled.I am not catching your drift. We are all related to Adam. What inheritance will you not speak ill of? Still don't understand why you said "adamah" (ground) is a Jew.
Good soil(adamah/jew first received a promised seed. One of three that bares witness on earth, is blood.I am not catching your drift. We are all related to Adam. What inheritance will you not speak ill of? Still don't understand why you said "adamah" (ground) is a Jew.
If you are Jewish - yes. Those things are NOT considered food in the bible.
Were there separate classes of Jews?Is they separate classes of Christians?
Jew and Gentile Christians?
No,PS. The law of Moses is what divided Jew from Gentile.
Were there separate classes of Jews?
Were not the Levites set apart for specific functions that no one else could do and that entailed different restrictions?
It is the same with New Covenant believing Jews.
No,
The separation is and has always been caused by the prince of power of air(leaven).
An external entity that wages war and sin against The Most High.
I thought The tribe of levites service was to minister and foreshadow the coming of The promised King of yhdh.Were there separate classes of Jews?
Were not the Levites set apart for specific functions that no one else could do and that entailed different restrictions?
It is the same with New Covenant believing Jews.
Romans 11:29I have good news for you brother.
The Levitical Priesthood is no more.
I thought The tribe of levites service was to minister and foreshadow the coming of The promised King of yhdh.Were there separate classes of Jews?
Were not the Levites set apart for specific functions that no one else could do and that entailed different restrictions?
It is the same with New Covenant believing Jews.
Romans 11:29
for the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.
IOW, it is PERMANENT.
BTW - this prophecy is for the New Covenant era: (speaking of gentiles)
Isaiah 66:21
I will also take some of them for priests and for Levites,” says the Lord.
If that is true, then Romans 11.29 is a lie.No more Levitical Priesthood.
New garments..No more Levitical Priesthood.
Even Levi, who receives tithes, paid tithes through Abraham, so to speak, for he was still in the loins of his father when Melchizedek met him. Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron? For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there is also a change of the law.
Hebrews 7:9-12
JLB