<SD>Well brother you came into this discussion with a mindset not to believe anything brought to you, there are dozens of sites and sources you could look to that prove the Lord's name is Yahshua and Not Jesus(not just one guy but thousands of people and scholars with decades of research and study). But you do not want to do that, you have already made up your mind on the matter. So this is where I leave you.
One more thing before I go. David already had a name, nowhere are we told Davids name would be a unique and powerful name given by heaven, or that it would change. David was a man not God, God names bears God's name that is just a simple and easily understood fact(Yah is God's name, God's name would then be Yah). The name given to Yahshua was given to him and only him, it is a name above all other names and none had possessed it before or since. How many people had the name Jesus before Christ came? Jesus is not a name above all other names, it is a name held by many before him and many after. Yahshua is God's name alone and none posses it but him.
May the Lord guide you to truth and light of his word brother.<SD>
The same thing can be said about you and other sacred namers. But I come to this discussion with graduate study in the Biblical languages and more than 5 decades of of study, teaching and preaching.
And in case you haven't noticed I have provided evidence to support my position from Brown, Driver, Briggs Hebrew lexicon and the Jewish Encyclopedia. But I have not seen comparable evidence supporting the counter arguments being posted.
There is no, zero, none credible, verifiable, historical, lexical, grammatical evidence to support the name Yahshua.
...I guess Mary didn't get the memo that her son's name would be Yashua. If that were true the Greek transliteration would be Iasous not Iesous.
Matthew 1:21-23
(21) And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS:[Ἰησοῦς] for he shall save his people from their sins.
(22) Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying,
(23) Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
BDAG Greek lexicon of the NT
Ἰησοῦς (יֵשׁוּעַ Jeshua, later form for יְהוֹשׁוּעַ Joshua; s. MLidzbarski, Handb. d. nordsem. Epigr. 1898, 291; FPraetorius, ZDMG 59, 1905, 341f; FSteinmetzer, BZ 14, 1917, 193ff; FWaele, Wetenschappelijke Tijdingen 5, ’42, 177–81), gen. οῦ, dat. οῦ, acc. οῦν, voc. οῦ, ὁ Joshua/Jesus. This name, common among Jews (several persons w. it in LXX and Joseph. [Niese, index]; EpArist 48; 49; ins fr. the time of Augustus [RevÉpigr n.s. 1, 1913 no. 12]; POxy 816 [I B.C.]; PLond III, 1119a, 2 p. 25 [105 A.D.]. Ostraca: Sb 5812; 5817; 5820; 5822), usu. takes the article in the gospels (in J the nom. freq. appears without the art.: RNevius, NTS 12, ’65, 81–85; GFee, NTS 17, ’71, 168–83) except when it is accompanied by a word in apposition w. the art.; in the epistles and Rv it does not regularly take the art. (B-D-F §260, 1; W-S, §18, 6; HvSoden, D. Schriften des NTs I/2, 1911, 1406–9).
Arndt, W., Danker, F. W., Bauer, W., & Gingrich, F. W. (2000). A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature (3rd ed., pp. 471–472). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
BDB Hebrew lexicon.
H3091. Yehoshua יְהוֺשֻׁעַ יְהוֺשׁוּעַ, and (later) יֵשׁוּעַ,
proper name, masculine (& location, see
9 below) (׳י is salvation, or ׳י is opulence, compare אֲבִישׁוּעַ אֱלִישׁוּעַ, אֱלִישָׁע, & NesSK 1892, 573 f.; in any case it came to be associated with ישׁע, compare Mat_1:21; on יֵשׁוּעַ see especially FräVOJ iv. 1890, 332 f. MüllSK 1892, 177 f. who cite analogue for change of וֹ to later ֵ֯, & Nesl.c.) —
1 Moses' successor, son of Nun, (ᵐ5 Ἰησοῦς)
[1] Brown, F., Driver, S. R., & Briggs, C. A. (1977). Enhanced Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon (p. 421). Oxford: Clarendon Press.