Deutsche Bank Flagged Irregular Payments Between Russia, Trump, and Kushner in 2016

Aryeh Jay said:

In 1981, Barrack Hussein Obama visited Pakistan, which had been protecting, hiding, funding, and providing safe haven for Osama bin Laden… Puts a perspective on Deutsche Bank.

Click to expand...

No, it does not.

Obama ordered the killing of Osama. Good riddance for sure.

Fantine said:

Trump borrowed $2.5 billion from Deutsche Bank, which has been fined for foreign money laundering.

Do you see now why Congress requests for records, on their way to the Supreme Court, are a matter of national security and not idle curiosity?

Deutsche Bank employees reportedly flagged suspicious transactions involving Trump and Kushner

Click to expand...

We have spent 2 years, $35,000,000, and employed how many anti-Trump lawyers investigating this matter...but you have the info that none of that produced. Interesting.

Fantine said:

A former employee shared that story. Despite the most obscene obstruction in American history, investigative journalists are putting together a picture with scores of scrupulously documented articles. If only 1% were correct, Trump would be up there with Nixon. If 5% were correct, he'd be in an infamy all his own.

I happen to believe all of them, and with two courts already ruling Deutsche must share its records, the Supremes will be hard pressed to obstruct justice themselves.

Three cheers for truth.

Click to expand...

Fantine said:

Can I hear a hallelujah? Deutsche has started sending records to Maxine Waters' committee.

Deutsche Bank turns over records on Donald Trump's business to Maxine Waters' committee

Now for New York State to send all those tax returns. We have waited so long to finally get proof of everything he's obstructed justice to hide.

Click to expand...

The records will either clear or condemn the President.

Not only if the President is condemned by the records, then AG Barr is going to get hit with corruption of office and OOJ hugely.

Stabat Mater said:

Trump is the greatest president of all times, its just so sad you fail to recognize it...

Click to expand...

And you say liberals are the brainwashed ones? What do you think your quoted words above sound like?

Stabat Mater said:

How is it being brainwashed by liberals?

Click to expand...

Ahhh! always nice to start off with an Ad hominem, saves time when it's the only "argument" some of President Trump supporters have.

Trump is the greatest president of all times, its just so sad you fail to recognize it...

Click to expand...

...or you're wrong and he isn't.
tulc(just thought that should be pointed out)

Albion said:

We have spent 2 years, $35,000,000, and employed how many anti-Trump lawyers investigating this matter...but you have the info that none of that produced. Interesting.

Click to expand...

Money well spent, unlike Il Duce II’s trips to Mar-A-Lago and Bedminster.

SarahsKnight said:

And you say liberals are the brainwashed ones? What do you think your quoted words above sound like?

Click to expand...

You should TRY and think those quoted words as “true”.
I know, it’s difficult and slightly uncomfortable.

A large minority of our fellow citizens were SO traumatized by suffering eight long years under Obama that they pinned ALL of their hopes for a better America on Donald J. Trump, they HAVE to believe in him or suffer the agony of despair!

Stabat Mater said:

How is it being brainwashed by liberals? Trump is the greatest president of all times, its just so sad you fail to recognize it...

Click to expand...

Only the brainwashed make such statements as these ... "greatest president of all times", ... particularly of a lying, womanizing, fear-mongering hustler like Trump.

Albion said:

We have spent 2 years, $35,000,000, and employed how many anti-Trump lawyers investigating this matter...but you have the info that none of that produced. Interesting.

Click to expand...

If you mean the Mueller investigation, that was narrow in scope and did not look into Donald's businesses or personal finances or his defunct "charity" except as any of that related to the campaign and Russian interference.

Albion said:

We have spent 2 years, $35,000,000, and employed how many anti-Trump lawyers investigating this matter...but you have the info that none of that produced. Interesting.

Click to expand...

When will folks realize gaslighting won't work?

AvilaSurfer said:

It’s just hilarious watching all these leftists running around screaming. Hilarious.

Click to expand...

Can you point to the "leftists" who are running around screaming?

Only the rw is running around screaming.

DaisyDay said:

If you mean the Mueller investigation, that was narrow in scope and did not look into Donald's businesses or personal finances or his defunct "charity" except as any of that related to the campaign and Russian interference.

Click to expand...

And you mean that the investigation concerned itself with what Congress charged it with investigating!

Sure, and because the investigators found nothing, the folks who had been confidently predicting that the president would be in jail by this time next year, etc., were forced to start all over again.

The interesting thing about that fishing expedition is that for months we have been hearing Democratic members of Congress saying that they do not need anything criminal in order to impeach the president. Either they do not have the votes, or it is not what they really are after.

Albion said:

Sure, and because the investigators found nothing, the folks who had been confidently predicting that the president would be in jail by this time next year, etc., were forced to start all over again.

Click to expand...

Is that what the report says? It says they found nothing? I haven't read it yet but clearly you must have to get to this conclusion.

Where in the report would I find the president's exoneration? I'd love to put this whole thing behind me and move on to other matters.

Albion said:

And you mean that the investigation concerned itself with what Congress charged it with investigating!

Click to expand...

Yes, that was a different investigation which was about the Russian interference with the 2016 election; it was not about Donald specifically.

Sure, and because the investigators found nothing, the folks who had been confidently predicting that the president would be in jail by this time next year, etc., were forced to start all over again.

Click to expand...

It's not true that the investigators found nothing, obviously, as several people are now in prison as a result. However, there are still other things to investigate such as violations of the emoluments clause and money laundering which were not allowed to be looked at by Mueller's crew.

The interesting thing about that fishing expedition is that for months we have been hearing Democratic members of Congress saying that they do not need anything criminal in order to impeach the president. Either they do not have the votes, or it is not what they really are after.

Click to expand...

Objectively, it's true that they don't need to prove a crime to impeach. Politically, however, they probably do. It's not the Democratic members of Congress saying this, it's people who are familiar with the Constitution and political historians.

Donald's election was a fluke, and he will go to trial, yes.