aiki
Regular Member
Hi my brothers and sisters. Can a believer become an unbeliever?
No, not a genuinely born-again believer, indwelt by God's Spirit and fundamentally transformed by him. (2 Corinthians 5:17) There are, of course, many "tares" in the Church (Matthew 13:24-43), false converts, or "false brethren," as Paul the apostle called them (2 Corinthians 11:26; Galatians 2:4), who appear to be saved but because they aren't truly saved, eventually depart from the faith. (1 John 2:19)
I believed we can all fall away from believing and following God's Word because this is what the scriptures teach...
One can certainly know about God and be familiar with Scripture and not be actually born-again. From this sort of thing many professing to be believers "fall away."
1 JOHN 2:18-19
[18], Little children, it is the last time: and as you have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.
[19], They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.
What did they go out from? Yep you guessed it. They went out from the truth. The CONTEXT is that there is many antichrists and false teachers.
Uh, no. Those who "went out from us" were "anti-christs," or those possessed of the spirit of anti-christ. And they "went out," not from the truth, but "from us," that is, the Body of Believers, the Church. In doing so they revealed that they were, in fact, anti-christs and not "of us," that is, not of the Church, the fellowship of genuinely saved people. John, then, is saying that these false believers within the Church, these anti-christs, finally revealed the falsity of their faith by departing from the Church. He points out that if they had been truly saved, if they had been "of us," they would have remained within the Body of Believers. What is in view, then, in John's words isn't believers falling away from the truth but false believers departing from the Church.
No longer believing God's Word they went out from us.
This isn't what John says, though. He doesn't say they believed God's word and then didn't but, instead, calls those who departed the Church "anti-christs" who because they were anti-christs (as opposed to actual born-again Christians) left the fellowship of genuine believers.
The very scripture you supply disagrees with your interpretation of it showing that anyone can FALL AWAY from the truth and no longer BELIEVE and FOLLOW God's WORD as shown in the very scriptures you quote or ignore...
??? You haven't shown this yet...
HEBREWS 3:7-19
[7], Why (as the Holy Ghost said, To day if you will hear his voice, [8], Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness:
[9], When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years.[10], Why I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do always err in their heart; and they have not known my ways. [11], So I swore in my wrath, They shall not enter into my rest.
[12], TAKE HEED BRETHEREN LEST THERE BE IN ANY OF YOU AN EVIL HEART OF UNBELIEF DEPARTING FROM THE LIVING GOD.
[13], But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.
[14], For we are made partakers of Christ, if we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast to the end;
[15], While it is said, To day if you will hear his voice, harden not your hearts, as in the provocation.
[16], For some, when they had heard, did provoke: however, not all that came out of Egypt by Moses.
[17], But with whom was he grieved forty years? was it not with them that had sinned, whose carcasses fell in the wilderness?
[18], And to whom swore he that they should not enter into his rest, BUT TO THEM THAT BELIEVED NOT?
[19], So we see that they could not enter in BECAUSE OF UNBELIEF.
When the Israelites doubted God's promises and were kept from the Promised Land as a consequence, did God utterly reject His Chosen People? Did He cast them off and leave them to their own devices? No. He didn't. He continued to be their God and provide and protect them in the wilderness. The Israelites may have departed from God in their unbelief, but He did not depart from them! How much more is He committed to the born-again believer whom He has adopted as a "joint-heir" with Christ? MUCH more! This passage, then, does not help your saved-and-lost false doctrine.
2 THESSALONIANS 2:3-4
Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the FALLING AWAY comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.
This passage doesn't say anything about who, exactly, falls away. It is reading into the passage what isn't there to say those who fall away are genuine born-again believers. It seems much more likely that false converts are in view here.
2 THESSALONIANS 2:9-10
The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, BECAUSE THEY DID NOT RECEIVE THE LOVE OF THE TRUTH THAT THEY MIGHT BE SAVED.
This confirms what I just suggested. Those who fall away are those who were not saved. That makes a lot more sense than the idea that truly born-again folk departed from the faith. These passages, then, don't help a saved-and-lost point of view.
HEBREWS 6:4-8
[4], For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
[5], And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,
[6], If they shall fall away, to renew them again to repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
[7], For the earth which drinks in the rain that comes oft on it, and brings forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receives blessing from God:
[8], But that which bears thorns and briers is rejected, and is near to cursing; whose end is to be burned.
Is one who is "enlightened" also necessarily saved? No. I know of people who understand the Gospel very well, who can lay it all out for me quite clearly, but who are not saved. They possess some measure of intellectual enlightenment but their hearts remain far from God. That this kind of superficial enlightenment is in view is supported by the fact that those being described had only "tasted of the heavenly gift." The idea of a taste of something suggests only a partial, limited experience of it. Jesus "tasted" the vinegar on the sponge lifted to his lips while he was dying on the cross. But as soon as he had, he didn't suck thirstily at the vinegar, but immediately rejected it. When I say I've tasted something, generally I mean I have had only a small amount of it. This, I think, is the sense in which "tasted" is used in the passage above from Hebrews 6 which in turn suggests that the enlightenment mentioned was only superficial or partial, too.
The word "partaker" in connection with the Holy Spirit is also, I think, referring to a second-hand partnering with the Spirit in his work in and through the Church. Many "tares" participate in the life and ministries of the Church. They don't have the Spirit indwelling them, but they still do partner with the Spirit by participating with genuine believers who are indwelt by him in their labours for God. That this is likely the way in which they have been "partakers" of the Spirit is confirmed by their falling away from the Gospel and the Church. As the apostle John wrote, "if they had been of us they would have continued with us."
[17], These are wells without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest; to whom the mist of darkness is reserved for ever.
[18], For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error.
[19], While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.
[20], FOR IT THEY HAVE ESCAPED THE POLLUTIONS OF THE WORLD THROUGH THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE LORD AND SAVIOUR JESUS CHRIST, THEY ARE AGAIN ENTANGLED THEREIN AND OVERCOME, THE LATTER END IS WORSE THEN THE BEGGINING.
[21], FOR IT HAD BEEN BETTER FOR THEN NOT TO HAVE KNOWN THE WAY OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, THAN, AFTER THEY HAVE KNOWN IT, TO TURN FROM THE HOLY COMMANDMENT DELIEVERED UNTO THEM.
[22], But it is happened to them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.
Yep seems Peter thinks that you can know and follow God and then turn back from God to follow SIN and leave God....
As your long quotation reveals, false teachers/prophets are in view in Peter's words, not genuine born-again believers. Verse 20 continues to speak of those who Peter had just said were "servants of corruption" and "wells without water" to whom is reserved the "blackness of darkness forever." How you can think, then, that Peter is describing genuine born-again believers in the section you've all-capped and bolded is beyond me. You might also pay attention to the word "if" at the beginning of verse 20. It could be construed as introducing an entirely speculative or potential situation, not a real one. He writes that if these lost false teachers escaped the pollutions of the world, etc., not that they actually had.
You'll notice that Peter speaks only of knowledge in the last three verses of your quotation from 2 Peter 2. He doesn't say they were saved, or born-again, or converted, or redeemed, only that if through the knowledge of Christ - not a saving faith in him - they had escaped the pollutions of the world but are entangled in them again, their end is worse than their beginning. What does it mean to "escape the pollutions of the world"? Does this refer to genuine salvation? I don't think so. I've known false converts who lived in a Christian manner, separate from the world in many ways. They could be said to have "escaped the pollutions of the world," avoiding bars, and strip clubs, casinos, even movie theatres, but it would have been wrong to say they were therefore saved.
Peter goes on to focus on what these people knew, rather than on what they had truly come to believe and put their trust in. (Verse 21) He doesn't ever indicate that he is talking about genuinely born-again people, only those who knew the way of righteousness. As I already noted, I know of a number of people who are not saved but who know the Gospel quite well. Their knowledge does not equate to salvation. I think this is true of those false teachers Peter described in the passage you've quoted above. He was not speaking of true believers who abandoned their faith.
ACTS 20:28-31
Therefore take heed to yourselves and to all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood. For I know this, that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock. Also from among yourselves men will rise up, speaking perverse things, TO DRAW AWAY DISCIPLES AFTER THEMSELVES. Therefore watch, and remember that for three years I did not cease to warn everyone night and day with tears.
Don't see any mention of born-again believers here. Your bolded bit only speaks of false teachers drawing to themselves followers - disciples. It doesn't say these followers were born-again believers, or, if they were, that they were therefore unsaved.
I've run out of time, I'm afraid, and will have to address the rest of your post later. Just scanning quickly through the remaining quotations you've put forward, it seems you continue to fall prey to eisegesis or the misapplication of Scripture.
Upvote
0