You must be getting desperate.
No, I'm trying to understand your literal approach to Scripture.
At times, you are keen to emphasise you take it literally. Yet when I ask what such an approach means for YOU, in practice - such as wearing robes and sandals, ignoring certain widows financially and Paul's lack of detail about hair length - you accuse me of desperation, contentiousness and legalism.
I can show you some scripture about modest wear for women.
But they probably don't count for you either.
I know where the verses are. What about Paul's instruction what women must not wear gold - what's your/your parents/friends wedding rings made of?
Why are you accusing me of trying to discredit Scripture?
Of course I'm not; I'm saying that a literal approach to Scripture leads to problems and contradictions. Rather than consider this, though, and ask "could it be that my approach to Scripture is wrong?", it's clearly easier to falsely accuse a fellow believer.
God offers you a glory, and you refuse it on the grounds that "it has nothing to do with salvation".
Sorry, but that's nonsense.
Hair takes time to grow - are you saying I won't be blessed by God until it's grown to a certain length? Good job he doesn't agree with you on that one.
God offers me a glory, but says "wait 2 years and then you will receive it - simply by staying away from hairdressers"?
When I said "I've had short hair all my life"; I did have longer hair for couple of years as a child, before I became a Christian. It was a pain. It got untidy, tangled, needed tying back, took a long time to dry and style and I was certainly not a better person because I had it. How was that "God's glory" to me - I didn't even know him.
I can't believe we're discussing this; it's not important.