So, can we agree that the cross has had a very diverse history.. and.. it was not always a sign of people of faith?It was, in fact, a symbol of Our Lord's work. But it was a symbol which used primarily by anti-Christian forces going at least as far back as the second century. In part, their agenda was to discredit Christianity in the eyes of would-be converts by associating it with a dishonorable form of execution like crucifixion.
There really is no modern day equivalent to that. Certainly not a guillotine.
And... I totally agree, thankfully we have no modern equivalent of the cross.. to what it was in the day of Christ. I chose guillotine to make a point of how horrendous it would have been in that time.
Upvote
0