You got me! But in secret. Yeah you won. That sums it all up. God approves of all undercover work, because of that.
Then
Upvote
0
You got me! But in secret. Yeah you won. That sums it all up. God approves of all undercover work, because of that.
However, after his brothers had left for the festival, Jesus went also, not publicly, but in secret -- John 7
Mine is kind of an odd take on this I suppose - BUT.......I don't think Jesus would work as an undercover officer, cussing,lying and deceiving. I can't imagine Jesus pretending to be a foul mouthed drug dealer. What do you think?
To catch drug lords and major criminals you have to play dirty there is no other way. You can get on your knees and pray but those major criminals will walk up to you laughing put a gun to your head and pull the trigger. Soldiers kill...that is against the ten commandments. It is not black and white very few things are. There are religious laws and laws of governments. Evan Jesus says give to ceaser what is ceasers and to god what is gods.
Okay maybe there are more honorable way to do it...but when you a criminal like a one of those cartel bosses who cause thousands of people pain and suffering every year...rapes, murders, drug dealing, sex trafficking...the worst of the worst..those victims...could care less about your moral beliefs or being honorable...they want the bad guys gone. Truth is good and honorable people do not accomplish much. Its those who are willing to do what ever is necessary. I get what you guys are talking about...and its a fairy tell. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. You try to do it honorably...and if you cant...you play dirty.It's fine playing dirty if we call it that, not something virtuous. There are other ways to catch major criminals; dirty isn't the only way. It may the way that we think works best, but it certainly isn't the only way.
The Redeemer said give to Caesar what is due to him because that is a property of a son of God. We are to obey all laws of the land we are in until it conflicts with the Most High God. We were ignorant enough to demand human leadership instead of being a nation under the Most High God, so we have to pay tributes to men, and man-kings, et cetera. That is more of a commentary on us; the Most High God just required a tithe for His priests - and those were based on increase of the land (not just you giving up what you don't have).
Okay maybe there are more honorable way to do it...but when you a criminal like a one of those cartel bosses who cause thousands of people pain and suffering every year...rapes, murders, drug dealing, sex trafficking...the worst of the worst..those victims...could care less about your moral beliefs or being honorable...they want the bad guys gone. Truth is good and honorable people do not accomplish much. Its those who are willing to do what ever is necessary. I get what you guys are talking about...and its a fairy tell. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. You try to do it honorably...and if you cant...you play dirty.
I get what you are saying as well. What I am saying (in my opinion) isn't as fantastical as you may think. For example, a lot of crime bosses are supported by the very entities sworn to protect and serve the public. That makes things complicated. It becomes a bunch of negatives giving you the same results the positive could give (the Redeemer way).
Now, I also think what you are saying works for any logical person in the world. But, being set apart means we don't follow the logic of the world - we go a different way. It seems like it is meaningless, but we are working on a scale of eternity, so our actions now affect the world as we know it in the near, and far future. It's easy to mimic psychology to be a more effective opponent/fighter/detective/soldier/etc. I don't actually disagree with you, but I do believe there are better ways. I just don't want to pretend the "logical" way is the virtuous way.
Otherwise, that is why only some people can/should do certain things. At the end of the day, each individual is responsible for their relationship with their Father.
No, but I do think that God could give a Christian extra grace to be able to be a undercover officer. Other than assuming an extra identity and deceiving criminals can some bad guys be caught. This work would be far better than the deceivers within the church who basically are pretenders for various reasons. Additionally, an undercover officers that operates within man's law seems far more righteous than any officer that would give false testimony in a court. Lying to a criminal is not a crime, lying to a judge is so differentiating is possible.Are you an undercover officer? You reason like one. You wouldn't or couldn't tell anyways.
Jesus is God incarnate so I would say he did go undercover and he went for the long game.I don't think Jesus would work as an undercover officer, cussing,lying and deceiving. I can't imagine Jesus pretending to be a foul mouthed drug dealer. What do you think?
Jesus is God incarnate so I would say he did go undercover and he went for the long game.
Paul tells us "To the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some"
We are bound by Christ's law and I don't mean to suggest we may participate in immorality to save those who are immoral (or that Christ did) But I do think it's important to point out in order to reach people effectively we need to be insiders not outsiders and this may involve us going undercover.
This is called contextualization. I know this is not quite what the OP is addressing but I think it may be a more productive topic.
No, but I do think that God could give a Christian extra grace to be able to be a undercover officer. Other than assuming an extra identity and deceiving criminals can some bad guys be caught. This work would be far better than the deceivers within the church who basically are pretenders for various reasons. Additionally, an undercover officers that operates within man's law seems far more righteous than any officer that would give false testimony in a court. Lying to a criminal is not a crime, lying to a judge is so differentiating is possible.
Ethical conduct for a Christian can be difficult. For instance, what if you were a missionary and failed to declare upon entering customs needed goods for a mission base? Would that be wrong? Or a Christian family that takes in an illegal immigrant because they had no real home? How about a church that violates copyrights in using worship music? Oops, I have seen that far too much. My personal answer to some of these dilemmas is can one find a righteous alternative? If the answer is no, then you have to examine whether the law of love would supersede, man's law. I think this is sometimes possible but should be rare.
I would rather follow the Bible as a guide to catch criminals than the constitution. Do everything to catch criminals that the bible allows.
Jesus "became sin" for our sake to save us.
Evan Jesus says give to ceaser what is ceasers and to god what is gods.
I'm not sure just how a figure of speech statement about His being "figuratively" made sin is not a statement about His "figuratively" being made sin.Being "made sin" is not literally or figuratively being "made sin" this is a figure of speech which actually means being made a "sin offering". He was the sinless/spotless sin atonement lamb.
I don't think Jesus would work as an undercover officer, cussing,lying and deceiving. I can't imagine Jesus pretending to be a foul mouthed drug dealer. What do you think?