- Jan 30, 2013
- 8,962
- 5,551
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Oriental Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
I think 15 percent is still within the predatory range. And it is perhaps a kindness to those who pay the higher rate to have their access to credit cut off. Predatory lending sucks the life-blood out of an individual.I support caps on interest rates but it isn't going to have the effect they're trying to convince their supporters it will. If interest rates are capped it will simply cut off credit to millions who are now paying higher rates. There is a benefit to that in that they won't be subject to predatory lending, but they won't have access to credit at the capped rate.
Of course there is still the option of actually enforcing the laws against violent criminals.The loan sharks will be thrilled to get the short term loan sector back. Personally I’m not a fan of giving legitimate business to violent criminals.
With the bottom 30% living in debt ($0.00 “wealth”), this liquidity-crunch would be the final straw for many families.I support caps on interest rates but it isn't going to have the effect they're trying to convince their supporters it will. If interest rates are capped it will simply cut off credit to millions who are now paying higher rates. There is a benefit to that in that they won't be subject to predatory lending, but they won't have access to credit at the capped rate.
Of course there is still the option of actually enforcing the laws against violent criminals.
Personally I see little difference between legalized criminal behavior of wealthy people and corporations and the illegal criminal behavior of the crooks.
The loan sharks will be thrilled to get the short term loan sector back. Personally I’m not a fan of giving legitimate business to violent criminals.
Why wouldn’t the banks want the 15% from ppl with not so great credit? It would still more than cover their risk. Just keep credit limits for those folks low.I support caps on interest rates but it isn't going to have the effect they're trying to convince their supporters it will. If interest rates are capped it will simply cut off credit to millions who are now paying higher rates. There is a benefit to that in that they won't be subject to predatory lending, but they won't have access to credit at the capped rate.
Why wouldn’t the banks want the 15% from ppl with not so great credit? It would still more than cover their risk. Just keep credit limits for those folks low.
I think the banks charge exorbitant interest rates because they can. I’m open to be proven wrong, but I think they would still make a profit - just a smaller one - off of the higher risk folks at a 15% rate and a low credit limit. When I had bad (no) credit, the big banks were offering me a 24% interest rate but my credit union offered me a 16% interest rate.Credit card companies already do similar things. But for a lot of people no one is going to take that risk at 15 percent.
It's been known since the 1960s that lack of available legitimate forms of credit drives the loan sharking industry. High interest forms of legal credit drove them out of business. Cutting off high interest forms of credit will revive it.
But in any event, capping credit card rates is not going to benefit anyone except creditworthy people. It's not going to help the people they are making the promise to.
So goes the plausible theory.... But, I've learned by experience theories about economic behavior don't always work out, no matter how perfect they seem. For instance, one theory most people knew of was the theory that endless big deficit spending would cause high inflation. Well....so much for that theory. It's not entirely false, but merely other factors were more powerful and overwhelmed the effect. For 3 years, 2009 to 2011, the deficits as a % of GDP were: 9.8%, 8.6% and 8.3%. What happened with inflation then? And that was with "quantitative easing", meaning the Fed bought U.S. bonds with money out of thin air, popularly called "printing". Inflation? Kaput.I support caps on interest rates but it isn't going to have the effect they're trying to convince their supporters it will. If interest rates are capped it will simply cut off credit to millions who are now paying higher rates. There is a benefit to that in that they won't be subject to predatory lending, but they won't have access to credit at the capped rate.
So you must be a huge supporter of legalizing non-prescription sale of Crystal Meth, heroin, crack, and other hard drugs so that the violent criminals don't get that business.The loan sharks will be thrilled to get the short term loan sector back. Personally I’m not a fan of giving legitimate business to violent criminals.
Yes. I support legalization. The only reason we have the horrors of the drug cartels and narco regimes is modern Prohibition.So you must be a huge supporter of legalizing non-prescription sale of Crystal Meth, heroin, crack, and other hard drugs so that the violent criminals don't get that business.
Besides as an Atheist, by definition you have no soul. So a feeding frenzy by loan sharks is all to be desired, in the name of the free market. Where are your Libertarian principles?
Yeah, nobody would have addictions to crystal meth, heroin, cocaine, crack, or any other drugs if they could just buy them out of a vending machine or at 7-11. People would miraculously be able to buy and use them without any problems for themselves or for society.Yes. I support legalization. The only reason we have the horrors of the drug cartels and narco regimes is modern Prohibition.
Yeah, nobody would have addictions to crystal meth, heroin, cocaine, crack, or any other drugs if they could just buy them out of a vending machine or at 7-11. People would miraculously be able to buy and use them without any problems for themselves or for society.
Of course that's how it is in libertarian fantasy land. We all know that in the real world there's an actual good and real reason drugs are restricted to requiring a prescription.
What do you mean it "doesn't work"???Well, with nearly a century of prohibition (of one drug or another), under our belts we can safely say that criminalizing drug use doesn’t work and in practice, ensnares more minorities (who have similar drug use rates as whites).
By making the “problem” of drug use a health issue, then treatment is much more probable as the stigma of being found to be engaging in criminal behavior can be a deterrent to treatment.