CNN Contributor: ‘When a Woman Is Pregnant, That Is Not a Human Being inside of Her’

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Article: CNN Contributor: ‘When a Woman Is Pregnant, That Is Not a Human Being inside of Her’

In a segment yesterday evening on Chris Cuomo’s primetime show, a CNN contributor and former New York City Democratic politician made a particularly unscientific assertion in defense of abortion rights. During a discussion about state-level “heartbeat bills,” which prohibit abortion after a fetal heartbeat can be detected, Christine Quinn claimed, “When a woman is pregnant, that is not a human being inside of her.”

Quinn, who served as the speaker of the New York City Council until 2013, is also a board member for the National Institute for Reproductive Health, a pro-abortion action fund. Her comment last night was, of course, factually and scientifically inaccurate by entirely objective standards.

Basic biology tells us that every pregnant woman is pregnant not with a horse or an acorn or a tumor but with another human being. Inside each pregnant woman is a human being that meets all the scientific criteria to be considered alive. Each embryo or fetus has human DNA, entirely distinct from that of both its mother and its father and, indeed, from every other human being that has ever existed or will ever exist for all of human history. Each of those developing human beings is inside its mother, yes, but not part of its mother. From the moment of conception, that unborn human being has all of the cells that will develop into fully functioning organs, into its own unique fingerprints, into its own heartbeat and neural tissue.

Birth does not magically confer humanity on that being. It was a human being from the start.

Progressives often accuse conservatives and pro-lifers of ignoring biological facts, of being “science deniers.” Abortion-rights advocates like Quinn are the real science deniers. She openly contradicts simple, scientific, biological facts for the sake of furthering her defense of the right to kill unborn human beings in the womb.
Her willingness to lie so blatantly is revealing. Why do pro-choice people blithely spew such ludicrous and unscientific nonsense as this? Because it is far easier to defend removing a “clump of cells” from a woman’s womb — to dismiss abortion as no different than having a tooth pulled — than it is to admit the biological fact that every abortion intentionally kills a living human being, and to defend it on those terms.

Here’s the segment from last night on CNN:




More at link: Abortion & CNN Segment: Christine Quinn Says Unborn Babies Aren’t Human Beings | National Review
 

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
248,794
114,491
✟1,343,306.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
Article: CNN Contributor: ‘When a Woman Is Pregnant, That Is Not a Human Being inside of Her’

In a segment yesterday evening on Chris Cuomo’s primetime show, a CNN contributor and former New York City Democratic politician made a particularly unscientific assertion in defense of abortion rights. During a discussion about state-level “heartbeat bills,” which prohibit abortion after a fetal heartbeat can be detected, Christine Quinn claimed, “When a woman is pregnant, that is not a human being inside of her.”

Quinn, who served as the speaker of the New York City Council until 2013, is also a board member for the National Institute for Reproductive Health, a pro-abortion action fund. Her comment last night was, of course, factually and scientifically inaccurate by entirely objective standards.

Basic biology tells us that every pregnant woman is pregnant not with a horse or an acorn or a tumor but with another human being. Inside each pregnant woman is a human being that meets all the scientific criteria to be considered alive. Each embryo or fetus has human DNA, entirely distinct from that of both its mother and its father and, indeed, from every other human being that has ever existed or will ever exist for all of human history. Each of those developing human beings is inside its mother, yes, but not part of its mother. From the moment of conception, that unborn human being has all of the cells that will develop into fully functioning organs, into its own unique fingerprints, into its own heartbeat and neural tissue.

Birth does not magically confer humanity on that being. It was a human being from the start.

Progressives often accuse conservatives and pro-lifers of ignoring biological facts, of being “science deniers.” Abortion-rights advocates like Quinn are the real science deniers. She openly contradicts simple, scientific, biological facts for the sake of furthering her defense of the right to kill unborn human beings in the womb.
Her willingness to lie so blatantly is revealing. Why do pro-choice people blithely spew such ludicrous and unscientific nonsense as this? Because it is far easier to defend removing a “clump of cells” from a woman’s womb — to dismiss abortion as no different than having a tooth pulled — than it is to admit the biological fact that every abortion intentionally kills a living human being, and to defend it on those terms.

Here’s the segment from last night on CNN:




More at link: Abortion & CNN Segment: Christine Quinn Says Unborn Babies Aren’t Human Beings | National Review

What IS "it" then, a "tumor"?
 
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
13,716
6,138
Massachusetts
✟586,261.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Inside each pregnant woman is a human being
The one inside her is a being, yes, and the being is human if the pregnant mother is human.

Now, when ones kill an unborn human being, who might they be killing? > the person they do not want that child to become in their lives. So, they indeed can be killing someone.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The one inside her is a being, yes, and the being is human if the pregnant mother is human.

Now, when ones kill an unborn human being, who might they be killing? > the person they do not want that child to become in their lives. So, they indeed can be killing someone.
Is it your contention, yes we are all human beings at conception but we are not persons?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gigimo
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
13,716
6,138
Massachusetts
✟586,261.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Is it your contention, yes we are all human beings at conception but we are not persons?
Well, I consider that someone is a person when conceived, but has not developed into having a conscious personality. So, it could be a matter of definition. But Jesus was Jesus as soon as the Holy Spirit put Him into Mary's womb. Did He at first have a fully developed personality? I would say not. He grew in grace and truth.

So, what do you understand about this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dms1972
Upvote 0

Quasiblogo

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 9, 2007
986
1,086
Continental U.S.
✟971,624.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We should consider the word "posterity" in the opening words of the U.S. Constitution:

"WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity".

Maybe we should also consider the word just before Posterity: "our". "Our" surely means male and female. The father and the mother. Human life becomes posterity after birth. A baby headed toward the status of "posterity" must be secured and allowed to be born.

We in the U.S. exist as a nation in order to help preserve the posterity of our children, and if we are not parents, of our neighbors' children. We cannot and must not just exist for our own generation. Abortion in the vast majority of cases is a method of avoiding that responsibility, all in the name of convenience or "ownership".
 
Upvote 0

section9+1

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2017
1,662
1,157
57
US
✟81,403.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So then someone who is severely autistic or in a coma or severely mentally handicapped has no developed personality either. Are they a person? What should be done with them? Not trying to argue, but society is filled with people who contribute little or nothing toward it and are a complete burden to it. And the world would function better without them. Should it? A lump of cells can be justifiably removed. A human being made into the image of God, is not so justifiably eliminated.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,944
11,098
okie
✟214,996.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Basic biology tells us that every pregnant woman is pregnant not with a horse or an acorn or a tumor but with another human being.
Well, not always does "basic biology" tell us that.
Oh, it is true, as Yahuweh (God) Says, and HE IS THE GIVER OF LIFE !

But in the world, "basic biology" is very often wrong. They do not even teach what actually causes disease ! (they reject it!)
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,944
11,098
okie
✟214,996.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Not trying to argue, but society is filled with people who contribute little or nothing toward it and are a complete burden to it. And the world would function better without them.
This is TRUE of most all grown-ups, teens, and adolescents also !

Eliminating all the (evil ones) whether "professionals"/ "scientists"/ "politicians"/ "teachers"/ "stock brokers" / "land lords" / "corporations"
will be done one day soon.... but in God's Time, not ours to even try !

Thus "not ours" to decide to use abortion at all, ever, period.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Nige55
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well, I consider that someone is a person when conceived, but has not developed into having a conscious personality. So, it could be a matter of definition. But Jesus was Jesus as soon as the Holy Spirit put Him into Mary's womb. Did He at first have a fully developed personality? I would say not. He grew in grace and truth.

So, what do you understand about this?
That we are Imago Dei from conception.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We should consider the word "posterity" in the opening words of the U.S. Constitution:

"WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity".

Maybe we should also consider the word just before Posterity: "our". "Our" surely means male and female. The father and the mother. Human life becomes posterity after birth. A baby headed toward the status of "posterity" must be secured and allowed to be born.

We in the U.S. exist as a nation in order to help preserve the posterity of our children, and if we are not parents, of our neighbors' children. We cannot and must not just exist for our own generation. Abortion in the vast majority of cases is a method of avoiding that responsibility, all in the name of convenience or "ownership".
A very interesting insight.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A lump of cells can be justifiably removed. A human being made into the image of God, is not so justifiably eliminated.
I think you define the debate.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,944
11,098
okie
✟214,996.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Are you arguing we can be something other than human in a human womb?
That's silly. Of course not!

"Biology", a science of men, is often wrong in what it teaches and states as if true.
Never depend on (never trust) man's science in anything , or suffer God's declared curse, as written in His Word.

I think that's what is meant.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,944
11,098
okie
✟214,996.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Yet not in this case.
Even a broken watch is right twice a day.

Since they are often wrong, even if once or twice right, (by accident?)
I don't trust them.

Believe what God Says in His Word - this is always truth.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Even a broken watch is right twice a day.

Since they are often wrong, even if once or twice right, (by accident?)
I don't trust them.

Believe what God Says in His Word - this is always truth.
In the case, for example, of the heartbeat bills they came about because we can prove without a doubt a human fetus has a heartbeat as early as 3-6 weeks. Are you implying that 'science' can be proven wrong later on?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Gigimo
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,944
11,098
okie
✟214,996.00
Faith
Anabaptist
New International Version
I will not look with approval on anything that is vile. I hate what faithless people do; I will have no part in it.

New Living Translation
I will refuse to look at anything vile and vulgar. I hate all who deal crookedly; I will have nothing to do with them.

Study Bible
I will Set No Worthless Thing Before My Eyes
…2I will ponder the way that is blameless—when will You come to me? I will walk in my house with integrity of heart. 3I will set no worthless thing before my eyes. I hate the work of those who fall away; it shall not cling to me. 4A perverse heart shall depart from me; I will know nothing of evil.…
Berean Study Bible · Download

re: articles on sin instead of truth and redemption and atonement and repentance.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0