Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,377.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In Ezekiel chapter 18 those heading into exile blame the sins of their fathers on their current condition. God emphasizes he will judge all. What you are leaving out is how this wickedness came about in the first place. Paul answers this in Romans 5.

heh heh, I'm not sure whether you confused me with another discussion, but I've been talking with you about verse 12 for a while now.

Are you arguing against the Reformed "mediate imputation" view also here in the thread?

This looks like may be of interest, just now reading:
Mediate or Immediate Imputation?
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,377.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How many do you need? Sin came as the result of, 'many died by the trespass of the one man' (Rom. 5:15), 'judgment followed one sin and brought condemnation' (Rom. 5:16), the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man (Rom. 5:17), 'just as the result of one trespass was condemnation for all men' (Rom. 5:18), 'through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners' (Rom. 5:19).
This is also the same subject Redleghunter, Godsgrace101 and I are just discussing in the last few posts. It seems as if in part the discussion is actually about 2 contrasting Reformed viewpoints on how we become guilty of Adam's sin, which is a very significant question to people at times. Whether we are guilty before we even exist, or instead become guilty because we sin because sin entered the world because of Adam. Of course the 2 views can matter in questions like infant baptism for instance.
Mediate or Immediate Imputation? (yikes that's a long post, I finally starting skimming after 1/2 through, and the end is somewhat interesting)
Here's a much shorter version of the 2 views:
Several theories have been proposed by Reformed theologians to explain how Adam's sin is transmitted to others. The "immediate imputation" view holds that when Adam sinned, all of humanity became sinful simply by that act, without further consideration. Under the "mediate imputation" view, humans inherited a proclivity to sin because of Adam's act.[2]
Imputation of sin - Wikipedia

You know, thinking on it more, I'm not quite of the 'mediate imputation' view even, or perhaps more a blend. I think we are like Adam and Eve. We are the same species.

That is, if any of us was put in the Garden in their place, we would have sooner or later done the same as they did.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,377.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And now advance to how Paul develops this concept and the rest of the story:

Romans 3: NASB

10as it is written,
“THERE IS NONE RIGHTEOUS, NOT EVEN ONE;


11THERE IS NONE WHO UNDERSTANDS,
THERE IS NONE WHO SEEKS FOR GOD;


12ALL HAVE TURNED ASIDE, TOGETHER THEY HAVE BECOME USELESS;
THERE IS NONE WHO DOES GOOD,
THERE IS NOT EVEN ONE.”


13“THEIR THROAT IS AN OPEN GRAVE,
WITH THEIR TONGUES THEY KEEP DECEIVING,”
“THE POISON OF ASPS IS UNDER THEIR LIPS”;


14“WHOSE MOUTH IS FULL OF CURSING AND BITTERNESS”;

15“THEIR FEET ARE SWIFT TO SHED BLOOD,

16DESTRUCTION AND MISERY ARE IN THEIR PATHS,

17AND THE PATH OF PEACE THEY HAVE NOT KNOWN.”

18“THERE IS NO FEAR OF GOD BEFORE THEIR EYES.”

You know, thinking on it more, I'm not quite of the 'mediate imputation' view even, or perhaps more a blend.

I think we are just like Adam and Eve, to begin with (ala Gen 1:27). We are the same species, to begin with.

That is, if any of us was put in the Garden in their place, we would have sooner or later done the same as they did. It was all necessary.

Here, today, we each simply replicate Adam and Eve's sin in our own ways, and God foreknew we would need a Redeemer.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GodsGrace101
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,298
Tuscany
✟231,507.00
Country
Italy
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yet look at the context of the entire passage. Look at what they do that is their claim to works of righteousness.

Matthew 7:
21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
I agree with you that many seem to be Christian on the outside but are not on the inside. I can think of some pastors that don't even really seem to be Christian in attitude but that know all the right words to say.

Jesus wants us to be Christian on the INSIDE and not on the outside. Many use God to earn money...like these big megachurches that somehow have been able to use a winning formula for growth.

So I do agree, but that doesn't take away the fact that it's those that follow the law that will make it to heaven...those that act upon the words of God and build their house upon THE ROCK.

24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:

Now note context here; does Jesus deny that they did these things? No He doesn't. They "look" Christian on the outside. But inside are "ravening wolves" (vs 16)

Now go back and start with verse 1 of the chapter. Jesus is talking about using discerning judgement and not being a hypocrite. Then He goes on to explain that what you see (or think you see) on the outside is not what's on the inside. And after giving a discourse of examples of this; He goes on to give the warning. "Many will say: Have we not....." And His response is to call them workers of iniquity!

Why? Because He's the only one who can see the totality of how far amiss their hearts are. Externally they "look fine". They've "fooled" a lot of people. There are other passages that explain how to spot these people in the church. They often seek leadership positions, so they can "lord over" other people. I've personally dealt with these types of people - how to spot them is a different subject though.
Agreed.

Now after the sinner has been awakened to their need for redemption; verse 7-14 explain their experience. They diligently search and plead for the narrow gate.

Why is this?

Because they are awakened to the fact that if it is not opened to them; they have no hope. And they take not for granted that God would "let them in" because they understand that they don't deserve salvation! They don't deserve God's mercy. They know that!

They don't say in their hearts "Oh, it's OK; God will "let it slide" if I'm obedient enough." They know and understand that all their righteousness is as filthy rags. They understand they are destitute and without hope in this world. They understand that God is the only one who can fix them and they plead to Him to fix them.
I'm not sure which verses your speaking of.
I agree about how we shouldn't be hypocrites.
Verses 7 to 12 speaks of God's love for us in that EVERYONE who asks will receive...and it tells of how God loves us as a father loves his son and would do anything for him. Verse 12 is the Golden Rule.

Verses 15 on tell of how we shouldn't be tricked by the wolves in sheep's clothing. And about trees bearing good fruit because the tree is good. IOW, if we're good on the inside, we will be good on the outside too.

So in these passages, Jesus is explaining that the Father is good; so He will fix them. Because just as you are wicked and at the very least feed your hungry children; how much more will God bestow mercy upon a sinner who is thoroughly convicted that they are in desperate need of mercy.
Right.
God will bestow mercy on a sinner that understands he is in need of God...God will give him what he seeks, just like a father will give to a son what that son seeks.

6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.

7 Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:

8 For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened.

9 Or what man is there of you, whom if his son ask bread, will he give him a stone?

10 Or if he ask a fish, will he give him a serpent?

11 If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to them that ask him?

12 Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.

13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:

14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
I don't believe any of the above helps your case.
Verse 13, for example, tells the reader to enter through the strait gate....God does not say to wait until HE does something...the person must ENTER, take an action, and go thru the right gate.

And so I asked @BNR32FAN this question - and I present the same question to you. Are you, or have you ever been convicted that you are worthy of God's wrath and did/does that scare you?
I can honestly say that I know only God's love.
I've never had any fear of Him...except for a holy and respectful fear for God Almightly in that I feel very small compared to Him...but not fear as I think you mean it.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
.
How could it be both?
Adam's sin WAS imputed to us...
Adam's sin WAS NOT imputed to us....

The second is correct and accepted by current scholars.

Adam fell causing all men to be included in that fall.
We have become sinners because of that fall....but we commit our own sins...Adam committed his sin.

We suffer from its effects...we are not judged on his sin, but on our own.
This is what you asked:

Could you clarify please.
In the above statement you say that the sin of one, Adam, is IMPUTED to all mankind.

Then in your post no. 88 you state that all mankind suffers from the EFFECT of Adam's sin...

Which is it?


It's both. Here's why:

We are all under the condemnation of the one sin of Adam. We all suffer from the fallen condition.
 
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,298
Tuscany
✟231,507.00
Country
Italy
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is also the same subject Redleghunter, Godsgrace101 and I are just discussing in the last few posts. It seems as if in part the discussion is actually about 2 contrasting Reformed viewpoints on how we become guilty of Adam's sin, which is a very significant question to people at times. Whether we are guilty before we even exist, or instead become guilty because we sin because sin entered the world because of Adam. Of course the 2 views can matter in questions like infant baptism for instance.
Mediate or Immediate Imputation? (yikes that's a long post, I finally starting skimming after 1/2 through, and the end is somewhat interesting)
Here's a much shorter version of the 2 views:
Several theories have been proposed by Reformed theologians to explain how Adam's sin is transmitted to others. The "immediate imputation" view holds that when Adam sinned, all of humanity became sinful simply by that act, without further consideration. Under the "mediate imputation" view, humans inherited a proclivity to sin because of Adam's act.[2]
Imputation of sin - Wikipedia


You know, thinking on it more, I'm not quite of the 'mediate imputation' view even, or perhaps more a blend. I think we are like Adam and Eve. We are the same species.

That is, if any of us was put in the Garden in their place, we would have sooner or later done the same as they did.

I read the above:
Immediate Imputation
Mediate Imputation
from the post only.

As far as I can see, there is no real difference.
This is why this subject if very difficult to discuss...

ALL OF HUMANITY BECAME SINFUL
and
HUMANS INHERITED A PROCLIVITY TOWARD SIN

is the same....
Do YOU understand there to be a difference?
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
heh heh, I'm not sure whether you confused me with another discussion, but I've been talking with you about verse 12 for a while now.
Yes now we need to move on as verses 13-21 explain the statement in verse 12.

Are you arguing against the Reformed "mediate imputation" view also here in the thread?
No just trying to get everyone to read the entire passage.
 
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,298
Tuscany
✟231,507.00
Country
Italy
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is what you asked:





It's both. Here's why:

We are all under the condemnation of the one sin of Adam. We all suffer from the fallen condition.
Agreed!
We all suffer from the fallen condition.

But we are not held personally responsible for his sin.
Augustine, who was catholic, understood O.S. differently from those that came before him. He actually did believe that babies are born WITH SIN, which is why the CC baptizes infants.

BUT, even the very catholic church that he represents does not state that Adam's sin is imputed to us...

CCC 404
404 How did the sin of Adam become the sin of all his descendants? The whole human race is in Adam "as one body of one man".By this "unity of the human race" all men are implicated in Adam's sin, as all are implicated in Christ's justice. Still, the transmission of original sin is a mystery that we cannot fully understand. But we do know by Revelation that Adam had received original holiness and justice not for himself alone, but for all human nature. By yielding to the tempter, Adam and Eve committed a personal sin, but this sin affected the human nature that they would then transmit in a fallen state. It is a sin which will be transmitted by propagation to all mankind, that is, by the transmission of a human nature deprived of original holiness and justice. And that is why original sin is called "sin" only in an analogical sense: it is a sin "contracted" and not "committed" - a state and not an act.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,377.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I read the above:
Immediate Imputation
Mediate Imputation
from the post only.

As far as I can see, there is no real difference.
This is why this subject if very difficult to discuss...

ALL OF HUMANITY BECAME SINFUL
and
HUMANS INHERITED A PROCLIVITY TOWARD SIN

is the same....
Do YOU understand there to be a difference?

Good question. It makes me think this: it's possible to have a sinful nature, but a small child is not yet old enough to be accountable, therefore doesn't yet have sin on their personal account (Rom 4:15, 5:13) (not old enough) (and I take David's verse in psalm 51 on sinning before even being born as hyperbole in keeping with the magnitude of sin he was repenting of). Put a different way we have a sinful nature. But I think we were made to be just like Adam and Eve to begin with, and not any other thing is even possible. It's simply the only possible way to have agency, free will, and be able to love by voluntary choice -- we'd naturally break faith at some point, and need a way to be atoned once we are sinning more seriously, but it's totally inevitable also.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GodsGrace101
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,298
Tuscany
✟231,507.00
Country
Italy
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You are right there is no partiality for those condemned Jew or Gentile (which by the way is the context of chapter 2). We all suffer the same fate being under the wrath of God.

However, there is partiality for those who are in Christ Jesus:

Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. (Romans 8:1)
There is no partiality with God as to who desires to be saved.

All men are born sinners and in need of redemption.
Romans 2...correct.

And there is no partiality for those who wish to be saved...God accepts EVERYONE that so desires salvation.

John 12:32
32“And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to Myself.”


By saying He would be lifted up, Jesus meant how He would die.

And He would draw, or invite, ALL MEN to Himself.
And any of these who accept Jesus as their Savior,,,will be saved.

John 3:16 Whosoever believes will be saved.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is also the same subject Redleghunter, Godsgrace101 and I are just discussing in the last few posts. It seems as if in part the discussion is actually about 2 contrasting Reformed viewpoints on how we become guilty of Adam's sin, which is a very significant question to people at times. Whether we are guilty before we even exist, or instead become guilty because we sin because sin entered the world because of Adam.
Bolded above would be in the Pelagian ballpark. Meaning only when we eventually sin do we become condemned. If that was the case a lot of people from Adam to Moses would have never died. Paul said they died even without sinning in the manner of Adam. It is clear from verses 12-21 it is Adams sin of disobedience which condemns.

Try this one on. We are indeed Imago Dei, yet also children of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.


Genesis 5: NASB

1This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day when God created man, He made him in the likeness of God. 2He created them male and female, and He blessed them and named them Man in the day when they were created.

3When Adam had lived one hundred and thirty years, he became the father of a son in his own likeness, according to his image, and named him Seth.
 
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,298
Tuscany
✟231,507.00
Country
Italy
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Good question. It makes me think this: it's possible to have a sinful nature, but a small child is not yet old enough to be accountable, therefore doesn't yet have sin on their personal account (Rom 4:15, 5:13) (not old enough) (and I take David's verse in psalm 51 on sinning before even being born as hyperbole in keeping with the magnitude of sin he was repenting of). Put a different way we have a sinful nature. But I think we were made to be just like Adam and Eve to begin with, and not any other thing is even possible. It's simply the only possible way to have agency, free will, and be able to love by voluntary choice -- we'd naturally break faith at some point, and need a way to be atoned once we are sinning more seriously, but it's totally inevitable also.
You're right.
Small children are born with the sin nature....
But sin is not accounted to them personally until they come to understand what sin is and when they commit sin.

I can go further and state with no doubt that this is what the early church fathers believed UNTIL Augustine in about the year 400. HE is the one that changed the meaning of Original Sin to mean that babies are born with actual personal sin and this is why some churches baptize their infants asap.

As I showed in post 128, even the catholic church (of which Augustine was a part) has retracted this belief and stated so in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think we are just like Adam and Eve, to begin with (ala Gen 1:27). We are the same species, to begin with.
How so? Yes same species as we cannot be any different physically. But Adam and Eve existed for a period of time without being condemned. From Cain to us today we are all children of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil which knowledge was obtained through disobedience against God.

For us to be just like Adam and Eve, we would have to be in the same state...meaning sinless and in Eden faced with the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

But this happened:

Genesis 3: NASB
22Then the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, knowing good and evil; and now, he might stretch out his hand, and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever”— 23therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden, to cultivate the ground from which he was taken. 24So He drove the man out; and at the east of the garden of Eden He stationed the cherubim and the flaming sword which turned every direction to guard the way to the tree of life.
 
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,298
Tuscany
✟231,507.00
Country
Italy
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Bolded above would be in the Pelagian ballpark. Meaning only when we eventually sin do we become condemned. If that was the case a lot of people from Adam to Moses would have never died. Paul said they died even without sinning in the manner of Adam. It is clear from verses 12-21 it is Adams sin of disobedience which condemns.

Try this one on. We are indeed Imago Dei, yet also children of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.


Genesis 5: NASB

1This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day when God created man, He made him in the likeness of God. 2He created them male and female, and He blessed them and named them Man in the day when they were created.

3When Adam had lived one hundred and thirty years, he became the father of a son in his own likeness, according to his image, and named him Seth.
The above is correct.
God made A and E in His image....
They fell and lost their preternatural gifts, but they were still made in the image of God.

But from the fall onwards...all men would be in the image of Adam in that he would have the ability to sin...the sin nature would be already part of man as it was in Adam.

Man was no longer pure and "good",,,his relationship with God was broken and so would be all his "sons" made in his image.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Agreed!
We all suffer from the fallen condition.

But we are not held personally responsible for his sin.
I don't know how many ways Romans 5:12-21 can be read other than Paul repeats himself in upwards echelon making it crystal clear.

The one sin of Adam we all suffer the consequences of that condemnation. It is evidenced that we all die. You do acknowledge above we suffer from the fallen condition. Yes this as well as "all have sinned."

1. Adam, as the head of the human race, caused every person after him to be born into a fallen condition or sinful state. This effect of Adam’s sin is known as original sin and is often referred to as inherited sin. All human beings have inherited a sinful nature through Adam’s original act of disobedience (Romans 5:12–14).

2. In addition to receiving a fallen nature, all people who came after Adam have been credited with the guilt of Adam’s sin (Romans 5:18). That is the meaning of imputed sin. An imputation is an attribution or a crediting of something. Imputed sin is Adam’s guilt attributed to or credited to us. All humans are counted as having sinned in Adam and thus deserving the same punishment for sin as Adam. Imputed sin affects our standing before God (we are guilty, condemned), whereas original sin affects our character (we are morally ruined). Both original and imputed sin make us subject to God’s judgment.

The penalty for sin is death. We are subject to spiritual death, or separation from God in this present life, due to imputed sin: “As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins, in which you used to live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient. All of us also lived among them at one time, gratifying the cravings of our flesh and following its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature deserving of wrath” (Ephesians 2:1–3). If we persist in this state of separation from God, the result is the second death, which is eternal (Revelation 20:11–15).

Physical death is also a penalty for imputed sin: “Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned” (Romans 5:12). The guilt of Adam’s sin was directly charged or imputed to the whole human family so that all people are now subject to death (Romans 6:23).

The apostle Paul teaches imputed sin in various passages: “The many died by the trespass of the one man,” “One trespass resulted in condemnation for all people,” “Through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners” (Romans 5:15, 18, 19), and “In Adam all die” (1 Corinthians 15:22).

More
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Good question. It makes me think this: it's possible to have a sinful nature, but a small child is not yet old enough to be accountable, therefore doesn't yet have sin on their personal account (Rom 4:15, 5:13) (not old enough) (and I take David's verse in psalm 51 on sinning before even being born as hyperbole in keeping with the magnitude of sin he was repenting of). Put a different way we have a sinful nature. But I think we were made to be just like Adam and Eve to begin with, and not any other thing is even possible. It's simply the only possible way to have agency, free will, and be able to love by voluntary choice -- we'd naturally break faith at some point, and need a way to be atoned once we are sinning more seriously, but it's totally inevitable also.
How do you account for a small child, baby or adult mental incompetent "having agency, free will, and be able to love by voluntary choice?"
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
there is no partiality with God as to who desires to be saved.
The dead who are children of wrath (Ephesians chapter 2) have no desire to be saved. That's all of us...until God makes us alive together with Jesus Christ (same chapter).

And there is no partiality for those who wish to be saved...God accepts EVERYONE that so desires salvation.
See above, same problem set. The dead don't desire anything pertaining to God and salvation.

John 12:32
32“And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to Myself.”
Yes the Gospel is preached to all. Many are called (the Gospel), few are chosen.

By saying He would be lifted up, Jesus meant how He would die.

And He would draw, or invite, ALL MEN to Himself.
And any of these who accept Jesus as their Savior,,,will be saved.
Are you advocating Universalism or something else?
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,377.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Meaning only when we eventually sin do we become condemned. If that was the case a lot of people from Adam to Moses would have never died. ...

Hebrews 11:5 By faith Enoch was taken up so that he did not see death: "He could not be found, because God had taken him away." For before he was taken, he was commended as one who pleased God.

2 Kings 2:11 As they were walking along and talking together, suddenly a chariot of fire with horses of fire appeared and separated the two of them, and Elijah went up into heaven in a whirlwind.

But I'd guess if forced to guess that perhaps they sinned, though likely not much, and then repented, promptly. (btw, there's no trace of anything pelagian in the mediate imputation view nor in the sin nature view. "Pelagianism is a belief...that original sin did not taint human nature and mortal will is still capable of choosing good or evil without special divine aid / assistance." A natural, inevitable tendency to sin is kinda the opposite to 'pelagian'.)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,377.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How do you account for a small child, baby or adult mental incompetent "having agency, free will, and be able to love by voluntary choice?"
Please edit and ask more clearly, since I'm unsure what you mean to ask.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

The Righterzpen

Jesus is my Shield in any Desert or Storm
Feb 9, 2019
3,389
1,342
53
Western NY
Visit site
✟144,506.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
The above is about John 15:1-10 right? I've seen it used a lot as a proof text for loss of salvation. The problem is few consider the audience (the 11 apostles), the context and most importantly the following verses of the passage.

The context: Jesus and the 11 just leave the meal and start their trek to Gethsemane. The last sentence in chapter 14 is "Get up, let us go from here." Judas is gone and at the very least John and Peter know Judas is the one who would betray our Lord. It is obvious to the other disciples Judas is gone from the other Gospel accounts. The very first discourse Jesus gives the 11 (the audience) is what it means to be a disciple.

John 15: NASB
1“I am the true vine, and My Father is the vinedresser. 2“Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit, He takes away; and every branch that bears fruit, He prunes it so that it may bear more fruit. 3“You are already clean because of the word which I have spoken to you. 4“Abide in Me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself unless it abides in the vine, so neither can you unless you abide in Me. 5“I am the vine, you are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, he bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing. 6“If anyone does not abide in Me, he is thrown away as a branch and dries up; and they gather them, and cast them into the fire and they are burned. 7“If you abide in Me, and My words abide in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be done for you. 8“My Father is glorified by this, that you bear much fruit, and so prove to be My disciples. 9“Just as the Father has loved Me, I have also loved you; abide in My love. 10“If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love; just as I have kept My Father’s commandments and abide in His love.

Verses 1-10 taken alone could be convincing that Jesus is warning His remaining 11 disciples that if they don't abide they will suffer the consequences of apostasy. If we take these verses along with the context of Judas in mind, then we can up that to a stern and sobering warning. Within the full context I would agree Jesus is telling the 11 this discourse on the vine knowing they know Judas is the betrayer. But it does not end at verse 10 and this is where it gets a bit more interesting and we understand the fuller context going forward:

11“These things I have spoken to you so that My joy may be in you, and that your joy may be made full.

With verse 11 included in the discussion and context we see Jesus state why He is telling them this Vine and Branches discourse. So that His joy may be in them and that their joy may be made full. Not a statement of loss of salvation, or a "you better do this or" type of context, but to assure them they are not like Judas who is an example of a branch which would be burned up. But the dialogue continues:

12“This is My commandment, that you love one another, just as I have loved you. 13“Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends. 14“You are My friends if you do what I command you. 15“No longer do I call you slaves, for the slave does not know what his master is doing; but I have called you friends, for all things that I have heard from My Father I have made known to you. 16“You did not choose Me but I chose you, and appointed you that you would go and bear fruit, and that your fruit would remain, so that whatever you ask of the Father in My name He may give to you. 17“This I command you, that you love one another.

More reassurance here from Jesus to the 11. He clearly states that He chose them and they did not choose Him. And what is clear within the context of verses 1-11 is they would go and bear fruit and that their fruit would remain. The key words are that Jesus chose them and appointed them to go bear fruit and that their fruit would remain. Obviously as the son of Perdition Judas was not appointed as Judas betrayed our Lord.

Chapter 15 is Christ reassuring the 11 that they are truly disciples.

As we continue to chapter 16 we see Jesus teach them about the Holy Spirit and how they will receive the Holy Spirit. In chapter 17 we see Jesus pray for His disciples (the 11) in what is called the High Priestly prayer.

Then we see all 11 run when Jesus is arrested, Peter denying the Lord three times. After all this assurance from Jesus the 11 abandon Him. Yet they were all kept, preserved and did not end up like Judas.

What's interesting is how Jesus restores Peter in chapter 21. He asks Peter three times if he loves Him. If we page back to chapter 15, Jesus makes the centerpiece of discipleship "if you love me."

:oldthumbsup: :oldthumbsup: :oldthumbsup:

Very good catch on the context of all of this. I'd never realized that until you pointed it out in the way that you did!

Now if I'd just been reading that gospel, chronologically through those chapters, I never would have picked out that particular verse and said - "Wow, look you can lose your salvation!"

To come to that conclusion, took someone some real hard twisting of the Scripture!

Wow - just wow!

I also noticed that you picked up that Judas is the "son of perdition". I picked that up in the Scriptures many years ago. I'm still working on how that fits in with certain other things related to the 1st century.

I'd be interested to hear your take on that as related to 2 Thessalonians 2:3. I've studied that through a bit and I know they are connected. I just haven't quite figured out how?
 
Upvote 0