- May 19, 2018
- 10,992
- 11,740
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Single
The Church and the Word of God go hand in hand.
Upvote
0
Of course they are not an obstacle, because of the the Sacred Tradition of the Church which lends to proper interpretation, regardless of whatever textual variations may exist in the copying of the text of Sacred Scripture.Textual variants are not an obstacle to the accurate preservation and transmission of God's Word.
if you need the bible to learn to treat people with respect, the bible won't help you.
Whoa. Cult theology.
Explain please.
Based on what Jesus said about it, it means anything else you have to say is from another root of teaching and not worth listening to.
I agree the bible teaches that. However, if you need the bible to learn to treat people with respect, the bible won't help you.
That's a lot of defensiveness for one post.
We learn how to act from our mom and dad, and socializing, on a spiritual level, we learn by being intimate with God and learning new things on a heart level.Explain please.
The Bible gives us ways to love God and our neighbor that goes beyond what the average person thinks about love. The lawyer willing to justify himself said unto Jesus, “And who is my neighbour?” (Luke 10:29).
Jesus replied with the Parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:30-37). In other words, we are to love the poor and or the beat up looking guy on the side of the road by helping them.
What about loving God?
Is it just doing our own thing?
No. Jesus said, if you love me, keep my commandments (John 14:15).
We are also to love God with all our heart, mind, soul, and strength, too.
Jesus spoke of the truth.I am merely speaking the truth. Sometimes the truth hurts (but it is nothing personal). I am merely standing up for what I believe is good and right. For has anyone ever accused you of being defensive when you stood up for your convictions or your morals?
We learn how to act from our mom and dad, and socializing, on a spiritual level, we learn by being intimate with God and learning new things on a heart level.
Saying it is the scripture that teaches us how to act implies we are robots to be programmed, through mind control, thus cult theology.
Participating in the divine nature is different than the slave covenant, using that mentality will result in failure to perform.If you ever did a study on God’s commands in the New Testament, you would think otherwise. There are many commands in the NT on telling us how to act. I am up to six hundred plus commands so far in my study on the commands in the New Testament (and I am in the beginning of the 1st epistle of John).
Jesus spoke of the truth.
He did say to the Father "thy word is truth"
He also said "the truth will set you free"
He also said "I am the Truth"
I see the appeal to God's words, but not the other dimensions of truth Jesus spoke of in your posts. I see slavery and an appeal to enslave others with following of laws.
I guess you could read Galatians for starters and such.Again, this would be your own lack of knowledge of what the New Testament actually teaches. Try reading Luke 10:25-37, Matthew 19:17-19, Matthew 5:28-30, Matthew 6:15, Matthew 12:37, Matthew 25:31-46, 1 John 3:15, Titus 1:16, Hebrews 5:9, Revelation 21:8 for starters.
This is sort of like the Israel Folau defence if you follow Rugby League in Australia. The proposition is that the right to religious freedom is overarching, and that an employer does not have a right to inhibit that in any way. In this case it is a sporting body that has embraced an inclusiveness code of conduct an a very gifted player who having been formally warned about anti-gay posts on social media, has indeed done it again. The Sporting Body has chosen to end the contract for the breach ($4Million a year to kick a football) which some are arguing is in breach of his freedom of religion which is in some sense enshrined in the constitution.I am merely speaking the truth. Sometimes the truth hurts (but it is nothing personal). I am merely standing up for what I believe is good and right. For has anyone ever accused you of being defensive when you stand by your convictions or your morals?
Participating in the divine nature is different than the slave covenant, using that mentality will result in failure to perform.
The Kingdom is not about talk, it is about power. The teachings themselves are kind of useless if you don't live them out and experience the reality of said kingdom.Nobody is suggesting we ignore that we are initially and ultimately saved by God’s grace through faith and that we ignore that God ultimately does the good work through us, but there are tons of commands in the New Testament given to us so as to tell us how to cooperate with God and to be in a right relationship with Him. To suggest so otherwise is to wear a blind fold and ignore the truth of what the Scriptures actually teach.
In your case that argument is for something that you declare to be an absolute truth - that is something that is true for all people for all time. A failure to express a concern for those who are hurt by such a standard is to my mind in conflict with the message of scripture.
This is sort of like the Israel Folau defence if you follow Rugby League in Australia. The proposition is that the right to religious freedom is overarching, and that an employer does not have a right to inhibit that in any way. In this case it is a sporting body that has embraced an inclusiveness code of conduct an a very gifted player who having been formally warned about anti-gay posts on social media, has indeed done it again. The Sporting Body has chosen to end the contract for the breach ($4Million a year to kick a football) which some are arguing is in breach of his freedom of religion which is in some sense enshrined in the constitution.
In your case that argument is for something that you declare to be an absolute truth - that is something that is true for all people for all time. A failure to express a concern for those who are hurt by such a standard is to my mind in conflict with the message of scripture.
I am not convinced that Jesus held to absolutes in this way, and that may be part of the message of the account of picking wheat on the sabbath - Mark 2:23-28.
And indeed I think in a way Paul argues for what may later come to be understood as a position of philosophical pragmatism, understand truth as the best answer we have at the moment, whilst acknowledging there may be a better answer at some later stage - see 1 Corinthians 13:12-13.
Yet also the write of the Johannine Epistles also in a way moves in a similar direction suggesting very clearly that as yet we do not have all the answers - 1 John 3:1-2
Standing on absolutes and ignoring the consequential damage to human beings made in the image and after the likeness of God - see Genesis 1:26-27 - is more like the lawyer and the priest and less like the samaritan - see Luke 10:25-37
If I may this reminds me of a movie quote:
"Only a sith deals in absolutes"