Who would you like to see run against Trump in 2020?

KCfromNC · Apr 27, 2019

Albion said:
...and then Mueller exonerated the President of any and all Russian Collusion

When?

KCfromNC · Apr 27, 2019

timothyu said:
If Jesus ran (independent of course) He would no doubt lose. He's too much anti-anything world of man.

Plus, not a citizen.

Albion · Apr 29, 2019

tulipbee said:
he wanted illegal info from the Russians. still a crime

You need some catch-up reading, tb

tulipbee · Apr 30, 2019

Albion said:
You need some catch-up reading, tb

I watched the video myself. case closed

Albion · Apr 30, 2019

tulipbee said:
I watched the video myself. case closed

I think that if "the video" is the sum total of anyones knowledge about this matter which has consumed the interest of our nation for the past two years, then my point is made.

GoldenBoy89 · Apr 30, 2019

I'd like to see Trump run....
.
.
.
.
A mile.

jardiniere · Apr 30, 2019

GoldenBoy89 said:
Buttigieg/Warren or Warren/Buttigieg.

Yes. This, please.

USincognito · May 1, 2019

Albion said:
...meaning that the Russian Collusion hoax was nothing but a convenient way to remove a validly elected president?

The "no collusion" a "hoax" mantras being repeated ad nauseum by Trump and his water carriers stopped being meaningful to anyone other than the base after the report came out.

It's all the less meaningful now that Muellers letter has been made public.

USincognito · May 1, 2019

Albion said:
?? which of those is it to be?

Libertarian and social liberal go hand in hand. Have you ever read the Libertarian Party platform?

USincognito · May 1, 2019

Albion said:
How to damage ones credibility in a single sentence.

Actually that would be parroting "no collusion" over and over like a mantra.
"no collusion"
"no collusion"
"no collusion"
"no collusion"

USincognito · May 1, 2019

Albion said:
Libertarian never meant Liberal, except in the Adam Smith sense--definitely not "social liberal," which is what you wrote. Had you meant the word in the sense of the former one of these?

Libertarian has ALWAYS meant social liberal. Seriously, you need to read the LP platform.

USincognito · May 1, 2019

Albion said:
Cmon. If Mueller and a dozen Democratic Party lawyers couldn't find anything with thirty million dollars to spend on the effort, it is time to give up the game.

Democratic Party lawyers? LOL .And do you seriously expect this gaslighting to work now that the report has been released?

The replacement story is that it was Attorney General Barr who changed everything that Mueller found out and that Mueller remains silent about it because ___________ (fill in the blank).

Ooooo! The fact that this post is from last Friday makes it quite ironic given the Mueller letter from March that finally was made public Tuesday.

Albion · May 1, 2019

USincognito said:
Libertarian and social liberal go hand in hand. Have you ever read the Libertarian Party platform?

Of course I have read it. And there is little comparison to be made to social liberalism, certainly no more than if we compared the Democratic platform to the Republican. In the Libertarian platform there is no Socialized Medicine/Obamacare, no Medicare for all, no income tax increases, no restraints on free speech, no gun confiscation, etc.

Speedwell · May 1, 2019

Albion said:
Of course I have read it. And there is little comparison to be made to social liberalism, certainly no more than if we compared the Democratic platform to the Republican. In the Libertarian platform there is no Socialized Medicine/Obamacare, no Medicare for all, no income tax increases, no restraints on free speech, no gun confiscation, etc.

Interesting list of things you don't like about Democrats. But maybe you're right and we need another term to describe the concept of individual liberty and autonomy with respect to social issues. Perhaps "cultural liberalism" is closer to the mark.

StromRider · May 1, 2019

yougottabekidding said:
Actually no -

One saved babies in the womb
The other saves babies in their homes.

yougottabekidding · May 2, 2019

StromRider said:
View attachment 255762

You are seriously trying to defend a position with a cartoon?

Speedwell · May 2, 2019

Some wise guy figured out that it is theoretically possible to win in the Electoral College with 23% of the popular vote.

How To Win The Presidency With 23 Percent Of The Popular Vote

yougottabekidding · May 2, 2019

Speedwell said:
Some wise guy figured out that it is theoretically possible to win in the Electoral College with 23% of the popular vote.

How To Win The Presidency With 23 Percent Of The Popular Vote

First: Danielle Kurtzleben is a woman - not a guy

and secondly - yougottabekidding is not just my name here

you might be better off with a cartoon.

Pommer · May 2, 2019

yougottabekidding said:
You are seriously trying to defend a position with a cartoon?

It’s a valid method of debate. “Illustrations”.
Not that I am attempting to shame you, or anything, just pointing out the truth.

StromRider · May 3, 2019

yougottabekidding said:
You are seriously trying to defend a position with a cartoon?

Why not? It clearly illustrates the point in a humerous manner. What is the problem?

Who would you like to see run against Trump in 2020?

Regular Member

Regular Member

Facilitator

Worker of the Hive

Facilitator

We're Still Here

Well-Known Member

a post by Alan Smithee

a post by Alan Smithee

a post by Alan Smithee

a post by Alan Smithee

a post by Alan Smithee

Facilitator

Well-Known Member

Senior Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic

Senior Member

Similar threads