frogoon234
Well-Known Member
- Feb 8, 2019
- 476
- 72
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
that last picture was from something else. Please ignore that. that was a mistake.
Upvote
0
I'm interested in peoples thoughts on this and how this may differ from their thoughts on infant baptism. Specifically, in the cases of a believers baptism can those with these impairments, especially in severe cases, be in good conscience baptized?
(this may sound like a loaded question, but it's not, I'm a part of a fellowship that rejects infant baptism, and although I have never asked I think in spirit those with severe intellectual impairments would not be allowed to get baptized and I'm not sure how I feel about this)
the church I belong to rejects infant baptism and I would think have issues with severe intellectual impairments (but I've have never asked the last one) I more flexible personally but I don't like to encourage multiple baptisms, I think it is unnecessary and it promotes counter-baptisms valuesIs the church you belong to believe this or do you believe this? Ofcourse everyone should be baptized. Theres no arguing against this. Case closed. If you got baptized as a child then get baptized again. If you feel its necessary to get baptized 50 times then get baptized 50 times. This is absolute nonsense to suggest anyone should be barred from baptism. Are you serious or joking?
the church I belong to rejects infant baptism and I would think have issues with severe intellectual impairments (but I've have never asked the last one) I more flexible personally but I don't like to encourage multiple baptisms, I think it is unnecessary and it promotes counter-baptisms values
Answer: Out on a LimboWhat of all the millions and millions of aborted children? What is their condition ?As they were not water baptized.
I dont see a point to baptizing an infant other than the parents dedicating the child to God as a proclamation.I'm interested in peoples thoughts on this and how this may differ from their thoughts on infant baptism. Specifically, in the cases of a believers baptism can those with these impairments, especially in severe cases, be in good conscience baptized?
(this may sound like a loaded question, but it's not, I'm a part of a fellowship that rejects infant baptism, and although I have never asked I think in spirit those with severe intellectual impairments would not be allowed to get baptized and I'm not sure how I feel about this)
Why should they not be?I'm interested in peoples thoughts on this and how this may differ from their thoughts on infant baptism. Specifically, in the cases of a believers baptism can those with these impairments, especially in severe cases, be in good conscience baptized?
(this may sound like a loaded question, but it's not, I'm a part of a fellowship that rejects infant baptism, and although I have never asked I think in spirit those with severe intellectual impairments would not be allowed to get baptized and I'm not sure how I feel about this)
If the churches which adhere to Believers Baptism are consistent, there is no basis for them to baptize a person who is mentally defective (sufficiently to not understand a conversion experience or the nature of God, etc.)
But the traditional churches, both Catholic and Protestant, which baptize infants and young children in the belief that the sacrament is God doing something for the recipient rather than the other way around…are being entirely consistent in baptizing such a person.
Our take is a simple one... if the person can decide they want to get into the water we allow it. We don't do infant baptism because they have no ability (the infant) to choose their own path. A parent has been given the gift of the child and has authority over them until they marry, but that child will answer for themselves before God and being baptized as a baby because it was the parents decision does not add or take from the fact that the child will still, one day, answer for themselves. But if anyone old enough to make a decision does... we allow it... why not?I'm interested in peoples thoughts on this and how this may differ from their thoughts on infant baptism. Specifically, in the cases of a believers baptism can those with these impairments, especially in severe cases, be in good conscience baptized?
(this may sound like a loaded question, but it's not, I'm a part of a fellowship that rejects infant baptism, and although I have never asked I think in spirit those with severe intellectual impairments would not be allowed to get baptized and I'm not sure how I feel about this)
You do realize some people with high functioning autism function better than some with aspergers right? The autism spectrum is a wide spectrum... It's not just about having aspergers that makes you function well.. Just like some people with PDD-NOS may function better than both aspergers and classic autism, or may not function as well. It's a wide spectrum and it depends on the individual. It is offensive to say someone on the autism spectrum doesn't function well just because they don't have aspergers. High functioning autism is still high functioning.I have a daughter with autism- high functioning but still classic autism, not Aspergers
You do realize some people with high functioning autism function better than some with aspergers right? The autism spectrum is a wide spectrum... It's not just about having aspergers that makes you function well.. Just like some people with PDD-NOS may function better than both aspergers and classic autism, or may not function as well. It's a wide spectrum and it depends on the individual. It is offensive to say someone on the autism spectrum doesn't function well just because they don't have aspergers. High functioning autism is still high functioning.
Ok that's alright. I'm on the spectrum myself so I just felt the need to point it out.I mentioned it to clarify the difference between the two diagnoses and not to make a statement about functioning. While I do consider autism (or other ASD's, for that matter) to be the kind of intellectual impairment the OP was talking about, that doesn't mean I don't recognize there is a wide spectrum of intellectual capacity and functioning. A lot of people consider high functioning=Aspergers; that's why I clarified. It is my daughter, after all- I think I get the difference.
It doesn't.How about a case of becoming severely impaired from an accident as an unbelieving adult. How does baptism contribute to this individual?
Yes. When an infant is baptized and then grows up and decides to "accept" His baptism and use the Holy Spirit that was given to him...and become a believer and becomes saved, he does not need to be baptized again.
Churches that require this are watering down what baptism is.
I do believe that adults should be baptized. In the early church adults waited as long as they could because it would wipe away all prior sins. That wold be ideal (adult baptism) and what I believe Jesus meant when He said to baptize all who the Apostles taught what He preached. Infants don't understand and cannot be taught.
However, it still has its effect.
I'm interested in peoples thoughts on this and how this may differ from their thoughts on infant baptism. Specifically, in the cases of a believers baptism can those with these impairments, especially in severe cases, be in good conscience baptized?
(this may sound like a loaded question, but it's not, I'm a part of a fellowship that rejects infant baptism, and although I have never asked I think in spirit those with severe intellectual impairments would not be allowed to get baptized and I'm not sure how I feel about this)
I'm happy for you.This belief is nonsense. I was baptized as an infant. My mom took me to church when she wanted to go. I remained an atheist though, unable to accept the facts heaven is real and Mary was a virgin. I still did not know there is a place called hell and what happened after Jesus was nailed on the cross. I thought Biblical stories were just that - historical accounts of ancient people. So I always htought baptism was useless. It obviously did not help me at all to either be baptized or belong to a Methodist church while growing up so I could not accept my baptism even after finally being saved at age 20. So I felt it was important to get a second baptism at my second church and am glad I did.
I'm happy for you.
You accepted your baptism at the age of 20 and became born again.
As a protestant I've believed that baptism is a sign of belief.
Why would jesus say to be baptized if it's only a sign?
Why do you think a person should be baptized?
and if we are unable to determine if it is desirable or not then what? certainly, extremely low functioning impairments still do respond to the things they like and the things they don't like, is this good enough to call it an expression of faith?