And "selected Congressmen and their staffs" will get to look at the report, but can't actually touch it or get a copy. They'll be able to come into a secure place, look at whatever version Barr wants them to see, and then leave. No copies can be taken.
On TV, he said they did not find evidence that any American colluded with Russia to mess with the American election. Also, he said they did not have proof that Donald is guilty of obstruction of the investigation. Also, he said Donald did not use privileges to hold back any information which he did have the legal right to hold back.
And the investigation includes information which needs to be classified, for national security and the safety of certain people.
So, I think it is honest to speak well of the fact that not all information will be released, since this can be good for national security and the safety of certain people.
And it is clear they looked at it and concluded there was no collusion by any American. This should be spoken of well, I would think, by honest reporters who are glad that no American was found to be colluding with the Russians. And they did not find proof of Donald doing any obstruction. So, it is honest to have hope that this is true . . . especially if we are loyal to the Constitution by presuming an accused innocent until proven guilty.
But if anyone is a personal witness of otherwise, you can report this.
There are people, maybe, who want to believe Donald is guilty of these things. But they need to have evidence, don't they? Or else they are in violation of the United States Constitution which requires they present evidence. And an American loyal to the United States Constitution will presume Donald innocent until and if a court finds him guilty. Plus, if we are loyal and informed citizens, we do not judge an accused person's present case by one's past crimes and performance. A past crime does not prove a present accusation, if I understand basic Constitutional law correctly.
Then, of course, we now can observe how well Donald and other candidates uphold these basics of Constitutional law . . . in how they speak about one another.
