You could very well be right. I could certainly be too optimistic.
Many CF members might feel that there are other forums besides CF where non-Christians can express their views, and CF has a commission from Jesus to spread His teachings. While free speech advocates might laud my ability to express my views on CF, if my posts are detrimental to the commission that Jesus gave to all his disciples then CF would probably have a duty to limit my free speech.
Well I don't know about including Jesus in any of this (if He has registered for any online forum, I have yet to see Him), but now you are talking about what would essentially be the moderating staff's decision. I know better than to argue about that. But as to the general idea that this place is to be for the continuance and spread of Christianity, certainly. But again, I don't see that in a way that is exclusive of others who are not Christians (i.e., Mormons, atheists, pagans, etc.) being able to express opinions and ask questions. What type of Christianity is it that only exists in the absence of any serious competing philosophy? I don't know, but I bet it's not very healthy, due to what is probably a long period of lethargy and hence having grown flabby and ineffective. (*cough*) When HH Pope Tawadros II appeared on 60 minutes some time ago, he visibly shocked the interviewer by insisting that, yes, the Church not only produces martyrs, but it
must produce martyrs from age to age, today being no exception.
And yet there are some people who cannot handle being disagreed with on an internet messageboard. Hmm. There goes "the seed of the Church", then? Nah. That would be silly. The drive to hermetically seal off any forums (religious or not) from outside opinion or questions produces sickness. (NB: not to encourage trolling/blatant hostility on clearly marked confessional forums, which is the sign of a different problem, but to be able to say "Okay, we see a difference between 'this person disagrees' or 'this person is not understanding where we are coming from' and actual trolling.")
Heresies are viewed as particularly dangerous because they are so similar to orthodoxy and can easily ensnare people who are seeking Christ.
Yes, certainly. I maintain that this messageboard is not a Holy Synod, however.
So I can see why CF might not want their computers and software to be used to lead people away from Christianity, and I can see why they might see non-Christian members as a danger for that reason.
Yes, I can too, but I think we may be looking slightly different aspects: I am talking about the freedom to ask questions and express doubts relative to whatever background the person comes here from/with, not to use CF as a soapbox from which to spread Mormonism, Islam, Buddhism, etc. (whatever isn't Christianity)
I see a very large difference between the two, even though it can be argued that one can be a kind of cover for the other. (Hence we should hope to have religiously and historically literate moderators and 'forum laity'.)